The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clumpak: a program for identifying clustering modes and packaging population structure inferences across K
Open accessAbstract
The identification of the genetic structure of populations from multilocus genotype data has become a central component of modern population‐genetic data analysis. Application of model‐based clustering programs often entails a number of steps, in which the user considers different modelling assumptions, compares results across different predetermined values of the number of assumed clusters (a parameter typically denoted K), examines multiple independent runs for each fixed value of K, and distinguishes among runs belonging to substantially distinct clustering solutions. Here, we present Clumpak (Cluster Markov Packager Across K), a method that automates the postprocessing of results of model‐based population structure analyses. For analysing multiple independent runs at a single K value, Clumpak identifies sets of highly similar runs, separating distinct groups of runs that represent distinct modes in the space of possible solutions. This procedure, which generates a consensus solution for each distinct mode, is performed by the use of a Markov clustering algorithm that relies on a similarity matrix between replicate runs, as computed by the software Clumpp. Next, Clumpak identifies an optimal alignment of inferred clusters across different values of K, extending a similar approach implemented for a fixed K in Clumpp and simplifying the comparison of clustering results across different K values. Clumpak incorporates additional features, such as implementations of methods for choosing K and comparing solutions obtained by different programs, models, or data subsets. Clumpak, available at http://clumpak.tau.ac.il, simplifies the use of model‐based analyses of population structure in population genetics and molecular ecology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inference of Population Structure Using Multilocus Genotype Data
Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M., & Donnelly, P. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/155.2.945 · Cited by 33,908
Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study
EVANNO, G., REGNAUT, S., & GOUDET, J. (2005) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02553.x · Cited by 21,895
Earl, D. A., & vonHoldt, B. M. (2012) · Conservation Genetics Resources · doi:10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7 · Cited by 12,340
Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-4558 · Cited by 10,474
Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals
Alexander, D. H., Novembre, J., & Lange, K. (2009) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.094052.109 · Cited by 9,898
Horn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840371 · Cited by 9,319
Falush, D., Stephens, M., & Pritchard, J. K. (2003) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/164.4.1567 · Cited by 7,959
Algorithms for Clustering Data
Sarle, W. S. (1990) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1990.10484648 · Cited by 7,865
Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis
Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (1990) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316801 · Cited by 7,344 · cited 1×
“We used the Jaccard index (Jain & Dubes 1988; Kaufman & Rousseeuw 1990) to measure the accuracy of the clustering solution obtained by C LUMPAK in comparison to the ‘real’ (simulated) modes.”
MethodThe interplay between habitat availability and population differentiation
Verkuil, Y. I., Piersma, T., Jukema, J., Zwarts, L., Baker, A. J., & Hooijmeijer, J. C. E. W. (2012) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · Cited by 6,547
Cited by
863 genomes reveal the origin and domestication of chicken
Wang, M.-S., Thakur, M., Peng, M.-S., Jiang, Y., Frantz, L. A. F., Li, M., Zhang, J.-J., Wang, S., Peters, J., Otecko, N. O., et al. (2020) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/s41422-020-0349-y · Cited by 286
The 5300-year-old Helicobacter pylori genome of the Iceman
Maixner, F., Krause-Kyora, B., Turaev, D., Herbig, A., Hoopmann, M. R., Hallows, J. L., Kusebauch, U., Vigl, E. E., Malfertheiner, P., Megraud, F., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad2545 · Cited by 231
Whole-genome analysis of giraffe supports four distinct species
Coimbra, R. T. F., Winter, S., Kumar, V., Koepfli, K.-P., Gooley, R. M., Dobrynin, P., Fennessy, J., & Janke, A. (2021) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.033 · Cited by 102
Community-wide genome sequencing reveals 30 years of Darwin’s finch evolution
Enbody, E. D., Sendell-Price, A. T., Sprehn, C. G., Rubin, C.-J., Visscher, P. M., Grant, B. R., Grant, P. R., & Andersson, L. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adf6218 · Cited by 75
Limited introgression supports division of giraffe into four species
Winter, S., Fennessy, J., & Janke, A. (2018) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.4490 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Kopelman, N. M., Mayzel, J., Jakobsson, M., Rosenberg, N. A., & Mayrose, I.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology Resources
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-02-27
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1179-1191
- ISSN
- 1755-098X (ISSN-L)
- 1755-0998
- OpenAlex
- W2147299002
- Cited by
- 3,246
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 112.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clumpak: a program for identifying clustering modes and packaging population structure inferences across K. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1755-0998.12387
- The paper
- Kopelman, N. M., Mayzel, J., Jakobsson, M., Rosenberg, N. A., & Mayrose, I. (2015). Clumpak: a program for identifying clustering modes and packaging population structure inferences across K. Molecular Ecology Resources. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12387
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.