The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
P op G en R eport: simplifying basic population genetic analyses in R
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Using scripting languages such as R to perform population genetic analyses can improve the reproducibility of research, but using R can be challenging for many researchers due to its steep learning curve. P op G en R eport is a new R package that simplifies performing population genetics analyses in R, through the use of a new report‐generating function. The function popgenreport allows users to perform up to 13 pre‐defined and 1 user‐defined analyses through the use of a single command line. Each analysis generates figures and tables that are incorporated into a pdf report and are also made available as individual files (figures are provided in multiple formats, table contents are provided as csv files). The package includes new R functions that simplify the importation of data from a spreadsheet file, examine allele distributions across populations and loci and identify private alleles, determine pairwise individual genetic distances using the methods of Smouse and Peakall () and Kosman and Leonard (), respectively, detect the presence of null alleles, calculate allelic richness, and test for spatial autocorrelation in genotypes using the methods of Smouse and Peakall (). The package has a modular structure that makes the process of adding new functionality straightforward. To facilitate the addition of user‐designed functions, the package includes a fully customizable module that can be automatically included in the pdf report. To support users not experienced in R, the website (www.popgenreport.org) has a tutorial for the package and a downloadable, portable version of the package with LaTeX pre‐configured for the Windows operating system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Waits, L. P., Luikart, G., & Taberlet, P. (2001) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01185.x · Cited by 1,437
Cited by
Kaya, C., Generalovic, T. N., Ståhls, G., Hauser, M., Samayoa, A. C., Nunes-Silva, C. G., Roxburgh, H., Wohlfahrt, J., Ewusie, E. A., Kenis, M., et al. (2021) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-021-01029-w · Cited by 149
Vergara, M., Cushman, S. A., & Ruiz-González, A. (2017) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-017-0512-0 · Cited by 29
Wilk, A. J., Donlon, K. C., & Peterman, W. E. (2020) · Urban Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s11252-020-00958-8 · Cited by 14
Functional immune diversity in reindeer reveals a high Arctic population at risk
Lukacs, M., Nymo, I. H., Madslien, K., Våge, J., Veiberg, V., Rolandsen, C. M., Bøe, C. A., Sundaram, A. Y. M., & Grimholt, U. (2023) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2022.1058674 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Adamack, A. T., & Gruber, B.
- Venue
- Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-03-02
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 384-387
- ISSN
- 2041-210X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059189547
- Cited by
- 640
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: P op G en R eport: simplifying basic population genetic analyses in R. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/2041-210x.12158
- The paper
- Adamack, A. T., & Gruber, B. (2014). P op G en R eport: simplifying basic population genetic analyses in R. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12158
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.