The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A multispecies occupancy model for two or more interacting species
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Species occurrence is influenced by environmental conditions and the presence of other species. Current approaches for multispecies occupancy modelling are practically limited to two interacting species and often require the assumption of asymmetric interactions. We propose a multispecies occupancy model that can accommodate two or more interacting species. We generalize the single‐species occupancy model to two or more interacting species by assuming the latent occupancy state is a multivariate Bernoulli random variable. We propose modelling the probability of each potential latent occupancy state with both a multinomial logit and a multinomial probit model and present details of a Gibbs sampler for the latter. As an example, we model co‐occurrence probabilities of bobcat (Lynx rufus), coyote (Canis latrans), grey fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) and red fox (Vulpes vulpes) as a function of human disturbance variables throughout 6 Mid‐Atlantic states in the eastern United States. We found evidence for pairwise interactions among most species, and the probability of some pairs of species occupying the same site varied along environmental gradients; for example, occupancy probabilities of coyote and grey fox were independent at sites with little human disturbance, but these two species were more likely to occur together at sites with high human disturbance. Ecological communities are composed of multiple interacting species. Our proposed method improves our ability to draw inference from such communities by permitting modelling of detection/non‐detection data from an arbitrary number of species, without assuming asymmetric interactions. Additionally, our proposed method permits modelling the probability two or more species occur together as a function of environmental variables. These advancements represent an important improvement in our ability to draw community‐level inference from multiple interacting species that are subject to imperfect detection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE
MacKenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Lachman, G. B., Droege, S., Andrew Royle, J., & Langtimm, C. A. (2002) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2248:esorwd]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,481
Bayesian Analysis of Binary and Polychotomous Response Data
Albert, J. H., & Chib, S. (1993) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1993.10476321 · Cited by 3,167
Completion of the 2006 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States.
Fry, J. A., Xian, G., Jin, S., Dewitz, J. A., Homer, C. G., Yang, L., Barnes, C. A., Herold, N. D., & Wickham, J. (2011) · Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing · Cited by 2,448
Occupancy Estimation and Modeling. Inferring patterns and dynamics of species occurrence
Yoccoz, N. G. (2006) · Wildlife Biology · doi:10.2981/0909-6396(2006)12[450:oeamip]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,300
Geographical Ecology: Patterns in the Distribution of Species.
Janzen, D. H., van der Meer, J. H., & MacArthur, R. H. (1973) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2259051 · Cited by 1,716
A guide to Bayesian model selection for ecologists
Hooten, M. B., & Hobbs, N. T. (2015) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/14-0661.1 · Cited by 891
A review of Bayesian variable selection methods: what, how and which
O'Hara, R. B., & Sillanpää, M. J. (2009) · Bayesian Analysis · doi:10.1214/09-ba403 · Cited by 771
Pollock, L. J., Tingley, R., Morris, W. K., Golding, N., O'Hara, R. B., Parris, K. M., Vesk, P. A., & McCarthy, M. A. (2014) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12180 · Cited by 712
Cited by
Northrup, J. M., Vander Wal, E., Bonar, M., Fieberg, J., Laforge, M. P., Leclerc, M., Prokopenko, C. M., & Gerber, B. D. (2022) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.2470 · Cited by 227
“Interestingly, although models have been developed for examining species interactions in hierarchical occupancy models (MacKenzie et al. 2004, Rota et al. 2016), and species distribution models (Pollock et al. 2014, Ovaskainen and Abrego 2020, Tikhonov et al. 2020), whereby the occurrence of…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Rota, C. T., Ferreira, M. A. R., Kays, R. W., Forrester, T. D., Kalies, E. L., McShea, W. J., Parsons, A. W., & Millspaugh, J. J.
- Venue
- Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-06-29
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1164-1173
- ISSN
- 2041-210X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2469830858
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 8.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A multispecies occupancy model for two or more interacting species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/2041-210x.12587
- The paper
- Rota, C. T., Ferreira, M. A. R., Kays, R. W., Forrester, T. D., Kalies, E. L., McShea, W. J., Parsons, A. W., & Millspaugh, J. J. (2016). A multispecies occupancy model for two or more interacting species. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12587
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.