Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 218

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using joint species distribution models for evaluating how species‐to‐species associations depend on the environmental context

Tikhonov, Gleb, Abrego, Nerea, Dunson, David, Ovaskainen, Otso·2017·Methods in Ecology and Evolution

Abstract

Summary: Joint species distribution models (JSDM) are increasingly used to analyse community ecology data. Recent progress with JSDM s has provided ecologists with new tools for estimating species associations (residual co‐occurrence patterns after accounting for environmental niches) from large data sets, as well as for increasing the predictive power of species distribution models (SDM s) by accounting for such associations. Yet, one critical limitation of JSDM s developed thus far is that they assume constant species associations. However, in real ecological communities, the direction and strength of interspecific interactions are likely to be different under different environmental conditions. In this paper, we overcome the shortcoming of present JSDM s by allowing species associations covary with measured environmental covariates. To estimate environmental‐dependent species associations, we utilize a latent variable structure, where the factor loadings are modelled as a linear regression to environmental covariates. We illustrate the performance of the statistical framework with both simulated and real data. Our results show that JSDM s perform substantially better in inferring environmental‐dependent species associations than single SDM s, especially with sparse data. Furthermore, JSDM s consistently overperform SDM s in terms of predictive power for generating predictions that account for environment‐dependent biotic associations. We implemented the statistical framework as a MATLAB package, which includes tools both for model parameterization as well as for post‐processing of results, particularly for addressing whether and how species associations depend on the environmental conditions. Our statistical framework provides a new tool for ecologists who wish to investigate from non‐manipulative observational community data the dependency of interspecific interactions on environmental context. Our method can be applied to answer the fundamental questions in community ecology about how species’ interactions shift in changing environmental conditions, as well as to predict future changes of species’ interactions in response to global change.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/2041-210x.12723

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 218

Metadata

Authors
Tikhonov, G., Abrego, N., Dunson, D., & Ovaskainen, O.
Venue
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-04
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
443-452
ISSN
2041-210X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2606174355
Cited by
218
References
2
FWCI
11.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using joint species distribution models for evaluating how species‐to‐species associations depend on the environmental context. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/2041-210x.12723
The paper
Tikhonov, G., Abrego, N., Dunson, D., & Ovaskainen, O. (2017). Using joint species distribution models for evaluating how species‐to‐species associations depend on the environmental context. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12723

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.