The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AudioMoth: Evaluation of a smart open acoustic device for monitoring biodiversity and the environment
Open accessAbstract
The cost, usability and power efficiency of available wildlife monitoring equipment currently inhibits full ground‐level coverage of many natural systems. Developments over the last decade in technology, open science, and the sharing economy promise to bring global access to more versatile and more affordable monitoring tools, to improve coverage for conservation researchers and managers. Here we describe the development and proof‐of‐concept of a low‐cost, small‐sized and low‐energy acoustic detector: “AudioMoth.” The device is open‐source and programmable, with diverse applications for recording animal calls or human activity at sample rates of up to 384 kHz. We briefly outline two ongoing real‐world case studies of large‐scale, long‐term monitoring for biodiversity and exploitation of natural resources. These studies demonstrate the potential for AudioMoth to enable a substantial shift away from passive continuous recording by individual devices, towards smart detection by networks of devices flooding large and inaccessible ecosystems. The case studies demonstrate one of the smart capabilities of AudioMoth, to trigger event logging on the basis of classification algorithms that identify specific acoustic events. An algorithm to trigger recordings of the New Forest cicada (Cicadetta montana) demonstrates the potential for AudioMoth to vastly improve the spatial and temporal coverage of surveys for the presence of cryptic animals. An algorithm for logging gunshot events has potential to identify a shotgun blast in tropical rainforest at distances of up to 500 m, extending to 1 km with continuous recording. AudioMoth is more energy efficient than currently available passive acoustic monitoring devices, giving it considerably greater portability and longevity in the field with smaller batteries. At a build cost of ∼US$43 per unit, AudioMoth has potential for varied applications in large‐scale, long‐term acoustic surveys. With continuing developments in smart, energy‐efficient algorithms and diminishing component costs, we are approaching the milestone of local communities being able to afford to remotely monitor their own natural resources.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Forney, G. D. (1973) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/proc.1973.9030 · Cited by 5,647
Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet
Kays, R., Crofoot, M. C., Jetz, W., & Wikelski, M. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa2478 · Cited by 1,638
Biotelemetry: a mechanistic approach to ecology
Cooke, S. J., Hinch, S. G., Wikelski, M., Andrews, R. D., Kuchel, L. J., Wolcott, T. G., & Butler, P. J. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.04.003 · Cited by 834
Biotelemetry: a mechanistic approach to ecology
COOKE, S. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(04)00112-0 · Cited by 656
Merchant, N. D., Fristrup, K. M., Johnson, M. P., Tyack, P. L., Witt, M. J., Blondel, P., & Parks, S. E. (2015) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12330 · Cited by 523
Acoustic Indices for Biodiversity Assessment and Landscape Investigation
Sueur, J., Farina, A., Gasc, A., Pieretti, N., & Pavoine, S. (2014) · Acta Acustica united with Acustica · doi:10.3813/aaa.918757 · Cited by 519
Towsey, M., Wimmer, J., Williamson, I., & Roe, P. (2014) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2013.11.007 · Cited by 369
Emerging Technologies to Conserve Biodiversity
Pimm, S. L., Alibhai, S., Bergl, R., Dehgan, A., Giri, C., Jewell, Z., Joppa, L., Kays, R., & Loarie, S. (2015) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2015.08.008 · Cited by 349
Detecting anthropogenic disturbance in tropical forests
Peres, C. A., Barlow, J., & Laurance, W. F. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.03.007 · Cited by 265
Acoustic monitoring for conservation in tropical forests: examples from forest elephants
Wrege, P. H., Rowland, E. D., Keen, S., & Shiu, Y. (2017) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12730 · Cited by 191
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Browning E., 2017, Conservation technology: Acoustic monitoring, WWF Conservation Technology Series, 1
- 10.1080/15614263.2013.800671 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2014.07.005 · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.07.005
- Hill A. P., 2017, Data from: Audiomoth: Evaluation of a smart open acoustic device for monitoring biodiversity and the environment, Dryad Digital Repository
- Hill A. P. Rogers A. &Prince P.(2017).Hardware from: Audiomoth: Evaluation of a smart open acoustic device for monitoring biodiversity and the environment. Circuithub project page.https://doi.org/10.5258/soton/d0334 · doi:10.5258/soton/d0334
- 10.1145/2750858.2807535 · doi:10.1145/2750858.2807535
- 10.1016/j.is.2016.11.002 · doi:10.1016/j.is.2016.11.002
- 10.1038/nj7653-253a · doi:10.1038/nj7653-253a
- 10.1525/bio.2010.60.1.9 · doi:10.1525/bio.2010.60.1.9
- Pinchen B. J., 2002, The history, ecology and conservation of the New Forest cicada, British Wildlife, 13, 258
- Prince P. Rogers A. &Hill A.(2017).Software from: Audiomoth: Evaluation of a smart open acoustic device for monitoring biodiversity and the environment. Github project page.https://doi.org/10.5258/soton/d0332 · doi:10.5258/soton/d0332
- Scopoli J. A., 1772, Observationes zoologicae, Annus V, Historico‐Naturalis Lipsiae, 1772, 70
- 10.18178/ijesd.2016.7.7.834 · doi:10.18178/ijesd.2016.7.7.834
- wa Maina C. Muchiri D. &Njoroge P.(2016).Cost effective acoustic monitoring of biodiversity and bird populations in Kenya.bioRxiv 072546.https://doi.org/10.1101/072546 · doi:10.1101/072546
- 10.1016/j.tree.2012.11.001 · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.11.001
Cited by
Emerging opportunities and challenges for passive acoustics in ecological assessment and monitoring
Gibb, R., Browning, E., Glover‐Kapfer, P., & Jones, K. E. (2019) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13101 · Cited by 730
A review of the major threats and challenges to global bat conservation
Frick, W. F., Kingston, T., & Flanders, J. (2020) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.14045 · Cited by 665
Computational bioacoustics with deep learning: a review and roadmap
Stowell, D. (2022) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.13152 · Cited by 471
Stowell, D., Wood, M. D., Pamuła, H., Stylianou, Y., & Glotin, H. (2019) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13103 · Cited by 414
AudioMoth: A low-cost acoustic device for monitoring biodiversity and the environment
Hill, A. P., Prince, P., Snaddon, J. L., Doncaster, C. P., & Rogers, A. (2019) · HardwareX · doi:10.1016/j.ohx.2019.e00073 · Cited by 282
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hill, A. P., Prince, P., Piña Covarrubias, E., Doncaster, C. P., Snaddon, J. L., & Rogers, A.
- Venue
- Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-01-15
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1199-1211
- ISSN
- 2041-210X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2772345051
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 19.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- Funders
- University of Southampton
- University of Oxford
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (1658469)
- Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (202650)
- Rufford Foundation (17047‐1)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AudioMoth: Evaluation of a smart open acoustic device for monitoring biodiversity and the environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/2041-210x.12955
- The paper
- Hill, A. P., Prince, P., Piña Covarrubias, E., Doncaster, C. P., Snaddon, J. L., & Rogers, A. (2018). AudioMoth: Evaluation of a smart open acoustic device for monitoring biodiversity and the environment. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12955
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.