Cited by 191Wildlife Ecology and ConservationMarine animal studies overviewAnimal Vocal Communication and Behavior

Acoustic monitoring for conservation in tropical forests: examples from forest elephants

Wrege, Peter H., Rowland, Elizabeth D., Keen, Sara, Shiu, Yu·2017·Methods in Ecology and Evolution

Abstract

Summary: The accelerating loss of biodiversity worldwide demands effective tools for monitoring animal populations and informing conservation action. In habitats where direct observation is difficult (rain forests, oceans), or for cryptic species (shy, nocturnal), passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) provides cost‐effective, unbiased data collection.PAM has broad applicability in terrestrial environments, particularly tropical rain forests. Using examples from studies of forest elephants in Central African rain forest, we show how PAM can be used to investigate cryptic behaviour, mechanisms of communication, estimate population size, quantify threats, and assess the efficacy of conservation strategies. We discuss the methodologies, requirements, and challenges of obtaining these data using acoustics. Where applicable, we compare these methods to more traditional approaches. While PAM methods and associated analysis are maturing rapidly, mechanisms are needed for processing the dense raw data efficiently with standard computer hardware, speeding development of detection algorithms, and harnessing communication networks to move data from the field to research facilities. Passive acoustic monitoring is a viable and cost‐effective tool for conservation and should be incorporated in monitoring schemes much more broadly. The capability to quickly assess changes in behaviour, population size, and landscape use, simultaneously over large geographical areas, makes this approach attractive for detecting human‐induced impacts and for assessing the success of conservation strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/2041-210x.12730

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These cloud-linked systems are already being used to track forest elephants, detect poaching, and monitor rare species on scales once thought impossible.

    “These systems are already being used to track forest elephants, detect poaching, and monitor rare species on scales once thought impossible”
  • By streaming sound and processing it locally with edge AI, real-time monitoring systems alert rangers to gunshots, chainsaws, or endangered species calls within minutes, enabling rapid intervention.

    “By streaming sound and processing it locally with edge AI, these systems alert rangers to gunshots, chainsaws, or endangered species calls within minutes, enabling rapid intervention (Aide et al. 2013; Wrege et al. 2017).”
  • Real-time monitoring networks are no longer just experimental; they are beginning to reshape conservation practice.

    “Real-time monitoring networks (see Sect. 3.1) are no longer just experimental—they are beginning to reshape conservation practice.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wrege, P. H., Rowland, E. D., Keen, S., & Shiu, Y.
Affiliations
Cornell Lab of Ornithology (US)
Corresponding author
Wrege, Peter H.
Venue
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-02-09
Volume
8
Issue
10
Pages
1292-1301
ISSN
2041-210X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2567936177
Cited by
191
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5
FWCI
9.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Methods in Ecology and Evolution (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
  • International Fund for Animal Welfare
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Keywords
passive acoustic monitoring, forest elephants, cryptic species, animal communication, population size estimation, conservation monitoring, tropical rainforest, detection algorithm

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review