The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Innovations in air sampling to detect plant pathogens
Open accessAbstract
Many innovations in the development and use of air sampling devices have occurred in plant pathology since the first description of the Hirst spore trap. These include improvements in capture efficiency at relatively high air‐volume collection rates, methods to enhance the ease of sample processing with downstream diagnostic methods and even full automation of sampling, diagnosis and wireless reporting of results. Other innovations have been to mount air samplers on mobile platforms such as UAVs and ground vehicles to allow sampling at different altitudes and locations in a short space of time to identify potential sources and population structure. Geographical Information Systems and the application to a network of samplers can allow a greater prediction of airborne inoculum and dispersal dynamics. This field of technology is now developing quickly as novel diagnostic methods allow increasingly rapid and accurate quantifications of airborne species and genetic traits. Sampling and interpretation of results, particularly action‐thresholds, is improved by understanding components of air dispersal and dilution processes and can add greater precision in the application of crop protection products as part of integrated pest and disease management decisions. The applications of air samplers are likely to increase, with much greater adoption by growers or industry support workers to aid in crop protection decisions. The same devices are likely to improve information available for detection of allergens causing hay fever and asthma or provide valuable metadata for regional plant disease dynamics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A two-stage cyclone using microcentrifuge tubes for personal bioaerosol sampling.
Lindsley, W. G., Schmechel, D., & Chen, B. T. (2006) · Journal of Environmental Monitoring · doi:10.1039/b609083d · Cited by 117
Cited by
Microplastics and nanoplastics in the marine-atmosphere environment
Allen, D., Allen, S., Abbasi, S., Baker, A., Bergmann, M., Brahney, J., Butler, T., Duce, R. A., Eckhardt, S., Evangeliou, N., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-022-00292-x · Cited by 485
Fungicide resistance management: Maximizing the effective life of plant protection products
Corkley, I., Fraaije, B., & Hawkins, N. (2022) · Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/ppa.13467 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- West, J. S., & Kimber, R. B. E.
- Venue
- Annals of Applied Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 166
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-17
- ISSN
- 0003-4746 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-7348
- OpenAlex
- W1581939508
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Innovations in air sampling to detect plant pathogens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/aab.12191
- The paper
- West, J. S., & Kimber, R. B. E. (2015). Innovations in air sampling to detect plant pathogens. Annals of Applied Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12191
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.