Cited by 24

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Socioeconomic status and risk of intensive care unit admission with sepsis

Storm, L., Schnegelsberg, A., Mackenhauer, J., Andersen, L. W., Jessen, M. K., Kirkegaard, H.·2018·Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Background: A recent study showed higher risk of bacteremia among individuals with low socioeconomic status ( SES ). We hypothesized that patients with a low SES have a higher risk of intensive care unit ( ICU ) admission with sepsis compared to patients with higher SES . Methods: This was a case–control study on patients with sepsis admitted to the ICU at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark (2008–2010). Three hundred eighty‐three sepsis patients were matched on sex, age, and zip code with controls retrieved from the background population. SES was defined as highest accomplished educational level, yearly income, cohabitation status, and occupation. The odds ratio ( OR ) of being admitted with sepsis to the ICU was calculated using conditional logistic regression, adjusting for the Charlson Comorbidity Index and the remaining socioeconomic variables. Results: The adjusted odds of being admitted to the ICU with sepsis were significantly higher among individuals living alone ( OR 1.72, 95% confidence interval ( CI ) 1.33–2.24, P < 0.001) compared to individuals living with a cohabitant. Individuals outside the labor force had an adjusted OR of 3.50 ( CI 2.36–5.18, P < 0.001) compared to individuals in the labor force. Individuals with a medium level of education had an increased risk of admission to the ICU with sepsis compared to a high level of education (adjusted OR 1.43, CI 1.02–2.00, P = 0.04). There was no significant association between income and risk of ICU admission with sepsis after adjustment. Conclusion: Individuals living alone, being outside the labor force, or having a medium level of education had significantly higher risk of ICU admission with sepsis.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/aas.13114

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.1001/jama.2016.0287 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)70112-X · DOI
  3. 10.1371/journal.pone.0048307 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1186/s12871-015-0063-3 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/oby.20468 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/aje/kwu032 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1371/journal.pone.0070082 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1111/aas.12644 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s00134-007-0934-2 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.002 · DOI
  12. 10.1097/00003246-198411000-00012 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/BF01709751 · DOI · Paper page
  14. OECD EU, UNESCO Institute for Statistics, OECD Publishing, 2015, ISCED 2011 operational manual: guidelines for classifying national education programmes and related qualifications
  15. 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1177/1403494811401482 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1186/s12889-015-1720-7 · DOI
  18. Diderichsen FAI, 2011, Inequality in health ‐ causes and efforts [Danish: Ulighed i sundhed – årsager og indsatser.]
  19. Casetta B, 2017, Association between cigarette smoking prevalence and income level: a systematic review and meta‐analysis, Nicotine Tob Res, 19, 1401
  20. 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30078-6 · DOI
  21. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08119.x · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61780-7 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1186/1741-7015-12-42 · DOI
  24. 10.1503/cmaj.110170 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s10865-008-9173-4 · DOI
  26. 10.1136/jech.57.6.424 · DOI
  27. 10.1186/s12939-014-0115-1 · DOI
  28. 10.1370/afm.994 · DOI
  29. 10.1378/chest.09-2661 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30322-5 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.2147/CLEP.S91125 · DOI
  32. 10.1177/1403494810394715 · DOI
  33. 10.1177/1403494811405098 · DOI
  34. 10.1177/1403494811408483 · DOI
  35. 10.1186/1471-2288-11-83 · DOI
  36. 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000120 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 24

Metadata

Authors
Storm, L., Schnegelsberg, A., Mackenhauer, J., Andersen, L. W., Jessen, M. K., & Kirkegaard, H.
Affiliations
  • Research Center for Emergency Medicine Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus C Denmark
  • Department of Psychiatry Aalborg University Hospital Aalborg Denmark
Venue
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-03-22
Volume
62
Issue
7
Pages
983-992
ISSN
  • 0001-5172
  • 1399-6576
Cited by
24
References
2
Language
en
Funders
TrygFonden

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review