Cited by 56Airway Management and Intubation TechniquesRespiratory Support and MechanismsTracheal and airway disorders

The Impact of a Soiled Airway on Intubation Success in the Emergency Department When Using the GlideScope or the Direct Laryngoscope

Sakles, John C., Corn, G. Judson, Hollinger, Patrick, Arcaris, Brittany, Patanwala, Asad E., Mosier, Jarrod M.·2017·Academic Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Background: The objective was to determine the impact of a soiled airway on firstpass success when using the GlideScope video laryngoscope or the direct laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department (ED). Methods: Data were prospectively collected on all patients intubated in an academic ED from July 1, 2007, to June 30, 2016. Patients ≥ 18 years of age, who underwent rapid sequence intubation by an emergency medicine resident with the GlideScope or the direct laryngoscope, were included in the analysis. Data were stratified by device used (GlideScope or direct laryngoscope). The primary outcome was firstpass success. Patients were categorized as those without blood or vomitus (CLEAN) and those with blood or vomitus (SOILED) in their airway. Multivariate regression models were developed to control for confounders. Results: When using the GlideScope, the firstpass success was lower in the SOILED group (249/306; 81.4%) than the in CLEAN group (586/644, 91.0%; difference = 9.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.7%–14.5%). Similarly, when using the direct laryngoscope, the firstpass success was lower in the SOILED group (186/284, 65.5%) than in the CLEAN group (569/751, 75.8%; difference = 10.3%; 95% CI = 4.0%–16.6%). The SOILED airway was associated with a decreased firstpass success in both the GlideScope cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.4; 95% CI = 0.3–0.7) and the direct laryngoscope cohort (aOR = 0.6; 95% CI = 0.5–0.8). Conclusion: Soiling of the airway was associated with a reduced firstpass success during emergency intubation, and this reduction occurred to a similar degree whether using either the GlideScope or the direct laryngoscope.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acem.13160

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence of airway contamination with either blood or vomitus has been shown to decrease the rate of first-attempt intubation success, regardless of the device used.

    “The presence of airway contamination with either blood or vomitus has been shown to decrease the rate of first-attempt intubation success, regardless of the device used.54”

    From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [54]

  • Sakles and colleagues retrospectively reviewed more than 4600 intubations and demonstrated that, although airway contamination was associated with a decreased first-attempt success rate, this was irrespective of the choice of GlideScope or DL as the first-attempt device used.

    “Recently, Sakles and colleagues 54 retrospectively reviewed more than 4600 intubations and demonstrated that, although airway contamination was associated with a decreased first-attempt success rate, this was irrespective of the choice of GlideScope or DL as the first-attempt device used.”

    From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [54]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sakles, J. C., Corn, G. J., Hollinger, P., Arcaris, B., Patanwala, A. E., & Mosier, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Sakles, John C.
Venue
Academic Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03-17
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
628-636
ISSN
  • 1069-6563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-2712
OpenAlex
W2573446363
Cited by
56
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1
FWCI
7.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Tracheal and airway disorders
Keywords
intubation success, GlideScope, video laryngoscopy, direct laryngoscopy, rapid sequence intubation, emergency department intubation, airway management
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Blood, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Intubation, Intratracheal, Laryngoscopy, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Vomiting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review