Cited by 6Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentPoisoning and overdose treatmentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Heightened mortality risk after a non‐fatal opioid overdose: Risk factors for mortality in the week following emergency treatment

Open access
Eide, Desiree, Gjersing, Linn, Danielsen, Aksel Wüsthoff, Skulberg, Arne Kristian, Dale, Ola, Braarud, Anne‐Catherine, Heyerdahl, Fridtjof, Tylleskar, Ida·2024·Addiction

Abstract

Aims: To measure all‐cause mortality risk after an ambulance‐attended non‐fatal opioid overdose and associations with number of days following attendance, and individual and clinical characteristics. Design: A prospective observational study. Setting: Oslo, Norway. Participants: Patients treated with naloxone for opioid overdose by Oslo Emergency Services between 1 June 2014 and 31 December 2018. Measurements: Medical records were linked to the national Cause of Death Registry (1 June 2014–31 December 2019). Crude mortality rates (CMR) and incidence risk ratios (IRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for the time periods (0–7 days, 8–31 days, 32–91 days, 92–183 days, >183 days) using multivariate Poisson regression analysis. IRR were estimated for sex, age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), respiration rate, place of attendance and non‐transportation following treatment. Robust variance estimates applied due to multiple risk periods. Standardized Mortality Rates (SMR) were estimated. Findings: Overall, 890 patients treated for 1764 overdoses contributed to a total time at risk of 3142 person‐years (PY). Median number of attendances was 1 (range 1–27). The majority were male (75.5%) and the mean age was 37.7 years. In total, 112 (12.6%) died; 5.2% within 183 days and 2.2% between 184 and 365 days. Acute poisoning was the most common single cause of death (52.7%). The CMR was 3.6 (95% CI = 3.0–4.2) per 100‐PY. The women had a SMR of 32 (95% CI = 15.8–57.9) and the men 24.9 (95% CI = 17.7–34.2). The CMR (22.2, 95% CI = 10.6–46.8) was particularly high in the first 7 days, and significantly higher than in the following periods. However, this finding was only valid for those with severe overdose symptoms (GCS score = 3/15 and/or respiratory rate ≤6/min). Except for increasing age, no other indicators were associated with the mortality risk. Conclusion: Patients treated by Oslo Emergency Services between June 2014 and December 2018 for a non‐fatal opioid overdose with severe overdose symptoms at attendance had an overall high mortality risk compared with the general population, but particularly during the first 7 days after attendance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/add.16632

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. UNODC, 2023, World Drug Report 2023
  2. 10.1177/10398562221075192 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.02.024 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.07.014 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00057.x · DOI
  6. 10.3109/09687637.2014.981509 · DOI
  7. 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00132.x · DOI
  8. 10.1177/1403494818779955 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/add.13026 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/10903127.2020.1740363 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/add.14426 · DOI
  12. 10.1136/jech-2019-212915 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/14659891.2016.1208778 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/10903127.2017.1387628 · DOI
  15. Statistics Norway, Population 2023 [Internet]
  16. Burdzovic J, 2022, Problematic drug use [Problembruk av narkotika]
  17. Gjersing L, 2024, Drug related deaths, 2023 [in Norwegian]
  18. Statistics Norway, Population and land area in urban settlements 2022 [Internet]
  19. 10.1111/add.14053 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/10826084.2021.1981388 · DOI
  21. 10.1080/08897077.2018.1485130 · DOI
  22. 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.9479612.x · DOI
  23. Sapra A, 2024, StatPearls [Internet]
  24. Jain S, 2024, StatPearls [Internet]
  25. Statistics Norway, Population [Internet]
  26. Rothman KJ, 2008, MODERN EPIDEMIOLOGY. United States
  27. Hennekens CH, 1987, Epidemiology in medicine
  28. 10.1186/s40621-017-0118-7 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.03.006 · DOI
  30. 10.1080/10550887.2020.1729079 · DOI
  31. 10.2307/1912526 · DOI
  32. Huber P, 1967, The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions
  33. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03140.x · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.4170 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.09.015 · DOI
  36. 10.1136/emermed-2018-207534 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.06.027 · DOI
  38. 10.3109/10903127.2011.569854 · DOI
  39. 10.1080/10903127.2021.1884324 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.04.020 · DOI
  41. 10.5811/westjem.2018.8.38829 · DOI
  42. 10.1001/jama.2015.3474 · DOI
  43. 10.1186/s40352-022-00201-w · DOI
  44. 10.1111/acem.14054 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Nitazenes: review of comparative pharmacology and antagonist action

    Stangeland, M., Dale, O., & Skulberg, A. K. (2025) · Clinical Toxicology · doi:10.1080/15563650.2025.2504133 · Cited by 34

    “…prolonged naloxone infusion is higher than that reflected in current clinical guidelines, where an hour of observation is deemed sufficient, and many countries allow patients treated with naloxone to leave without further observation after short periods of time, which is considered safe [52–54].”
    Self-citation

See all 6

Metadata

Authors
Eide, D., Gjersing, L., Danielsen, A. W., Skulberg, A. K., Dale, O., Braarud, A., Heyerdahl, F., & Tylleskar, I.
Affiliations
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • Division of Prehospital Services Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
  • Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim Norway
Corresponding author
Eide, Desiree
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-08-26
Volume
119
Issue
12
Pages
2131-2138
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W4401891970
Cited by
6
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Oslo universitetssykehus HF
  • Senter for rus- og avhengighetsforskning, Universitetet i Oslo
  • Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet
  • St. Olavs Hospital Universitetssykehuset i Trondheim
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Poisoning and overdose treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
opioid overdose, non-fatal overdose, all-cause mortality, naloxone, emergency medical services, ambulance attendances, acute poisoning, mortality risk factors, Glasgow Coma Scale, sex differences, time since treatment, opioid use disorder, harm reduction, cause of death registry, standardized mortality rate
MeSH terms
Opiate Overdose, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Ambulances, Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Treatment, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Naloxone, Narcotic Antagonists, Norway, Prospective Studies, Registries, Risk Factors, Young Adult, Drug Overdose

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heightened mortality risk after a non‐fatal opioid overdose: Risk factors for mortality in the week following emergency treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/add.16632
The paper
Eide, D., Gjersing, L., Danielsen, A. W., Skulberg, A. K., Dale, O., Braarud, A., Heyerdahl, F., & Tylleskar, I. (2024). Heightened mortality risk after a non‐fatal opioid overdose: Risk factors for mortality in the week following emergency treatment. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16632