Cited by 1Forensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Commentary on Bade et al.: Threat of nitazenes and other potent synthetic opioids—Is Europe prepared? Time to respond and to learn

Open access
Giraudon, Isabelle, Gallegos, Ana, Handanagić, Senad, Mounteney, Jane·2025·Addiction

Abstract

Threat of nitazenes and other potent synthetic opioids-Is Europe prepared?Time to respond and to learn Preparedness to respond to increased access and use of new and potent synthetic opioids requires developing action-oriented monitoring systems capable of combining multiple data sources, performing analytical triangulation, and the generation of timely alerts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/add.70150

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) collectively accounted for approximately 75% of novel synthetic opioid adulterant seizures reported to the EUDA, including nitazenes and carfentanil.

    “particularly the Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania), which collectively accounted for approximately 75% of novel synthetic opioid adulterant seizures reported to the EUDA, including nitazenes and carfentanil [29, 30, 31, 32].”

    From Temporal and geographical patterns of nitazene detections in drug samples and biospecimens in the United States, 2019–2024 (2026) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Abstract reports nitazene detections in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania and discusses EUDA seizure data. It does not say that the three countries accounted for approximately 75% of reported novel synthetic opioid adulterant seizures, or identify carfentanil in that figure. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Similar patterns of nitazene-involved overdose deaths have been observed internationally, particularly in Northern Europe.

    “Similar patterns have been observed internationally, particularly in Northern Europe [29, 30].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Giraudon, I., Gallegos, A., Handanagić, S., & Mounteney, J.
Affiliations
Substance Use, Harms and Responses Unit European Union Drugs Agency (EUDA) Lisbon Portugal
Corresponding author
Giraudon, Isabelle
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-07-17
Volume
120
Issue
9
Pages
1747-1748
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W4412493179
Cited by
0
References
8
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
nitazenes, synthetic opioids, drug alerts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review