The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Runs of homozygosity: current knowledge and applications in livestock
Abstract
Summary: This review presents a broader approach to the implementation and study of runs of homozygosity (ROH) in animal populations, focusing on identifying and characterizing ROH and their practical implications. ROH are continuous homozygous segments that are common in individuals and populations. The ability of these homozygous segments to give insight into a population's genetic events makes them a useful tool that can provide information about the demographic evolution of a population over time. Furthermore, ROH provide useful information about the genetic relatedness among individuals, helping to minimize the inbreeding rate and also helping to expose deleterious variants in the genome. The frequency, size and distribution of ROH in the genome are influenced by factors such as natural and artificial selection, recombination, linkage disequilibrium, population structure, mutation rate and inbreeding level. Calculating the inbreeding coefficient from molecular information from ROH (F ROH) is more accurate for estimating autozygosity and for detecting both past and more recent inbreeding effects than are estimates from pedigree data (F PED). The better results of F ROH suggest that F ROH can be used to infer information about the history and inbreeding levels of a population in the absence of genealogical information. The selection of superior animals has produced large phenotypic changes and has reshaped the ROH patterns in various regions of the genome. Additionally, selection increases homozygosity around the target locus, and deleterious variants are seen to occur more frequently in ROH regions. Studies involving ROH are increasingly common and provide valuable information about how the genome's architecture can disclose a population's genetic background. By revealing the molecular changes in populations over time, genome‐wide information is crucial to understanding antecedent genome architecture and, therefore, to maintaining diversity and fitness in endangered livestock breeds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.
Purcell, S., Neale, B., Todd-Brown, K., Thomas, L., Ferreira, M. A. R., Bender, D., Maller, J., Sklar, P., de Bakker, P. I. W., Daly, M. J., et al. (2007) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/519795 · Cited by 34,089
Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps
Barrett, J. C., Fry, B., Maller, J., & Daly, M. J. (2005) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457 · Cited by 14,525
Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution
Avise, J. C. (1994) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-2381-9 · Cited by 5,242
Introduction to Quantitative Genetics
G., J.-M., & Falconer, D. S. (1962) · Population (French Edition) · doi:10.2307/1525780 · Cited by 3,705
Inbreeding effects in wild populations
Keller, L. (2002) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(02)02489-8 · Cited by 3,309
Clark, P. U., Dyke, A. S., Shakun, J. D., Carlson, A. E., Clark, J., Wohlfarth, B., Mitrovica, J. X., Hostetler, S. W., & McCabe, A. M. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172873 · Cited by 3,277
The genetics of inbreeding depression
Charlesworth, D., & Willis, J. H. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2664 · Cited by 2,219
Coefficients of Inbreeding and Relationship
Wright, S. (1922) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/279872 · Cited by 2,213
Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution
Groenen, M. A. M., Archibald, A. L., Uenishi, H., Tuggle, C. K., Takeuchi, Y., Rothschild, M. F., Rogel-Gaillard, C., Park, C., Milan, D., Megens, H.-J., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11622 · Cited by 1,385
Cited by
Meyermans, R., Gorssen, W., Buys, N., & Janssens, S. (2020) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-020-6463-x · Cited by 367
Szmatoła, T., Gurgul, A., Jasielczuk, I., Oclon, E., Ropka-Molik, K., Stefaniuk-Szmukier, M., Polak, G., Tomczyk-Wrona, I., & Bugno-Poniewierska, M. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12233293 · Cited by 33
Verardo, L. L., Otto, P. I., Machado, M. A., do Carmo Panetto, J. C., Faza, D. R. D. L. R., Alves do Egito, A., Vitorino, A. S. M., Carolino, M. I. C. M., Carolino, N. P., & da Silva, M. V. G. B. (2024) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2024.105455 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Peripolli, E., Munari, D. P., Silva, M. V. G. B., Lima, A. L. F., Irgang, R., & Baldi, F.
- Venue
- Animal Genetics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 255-271
- ISSN
- 0268-9146 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2052
- OpenAlex
- W2559013477
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 96
- FWCI
- 11.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Runs of homozygosity: current knowledge and applications in livestock. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/age.12526
- The paper
- Peripolli, E., Munari, D. P., Silva, M. V. G. B., Lima, A. L. F., Irgang, R., & Baldi, F. (2017). Runs of homozygosity: current knowledge and applications in livestock. Animal Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12526
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.