The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How to study runs of homozygosity using PLINK? A guide for analyzing medium density SNP data in livestock and pet species
Open accessAbstract
Background: PLINK is probably the most used program for analyzing SNP genotypes and runs of homozygosity (ROH), both in human and in animal populations. The last decade, ROH analyses have become the state-of-the-art method for inbreeding assessment. In PLINK, the --homozyg function is used to perform ROH analyses and relies on several input settings. These settings can have a large impact on the outcome and default values are not always appropriate for medium density SNP array data. Guidelines for a robust and uniform ROH analysis in PLINK using medium density data are lacking, albeit these guidelines are vital for comparing different ROH studies. In this study, 8 populations of different livestock and pet species are used to demonstrate the importance of PLINK input settings. Moreover, the effects of pruning SNPs for low minor allele frequencies and linkage disequilibrium on ROH detection are shown. Results: We introduce the genome coverage parameter to appropriately estimate F ROH and to check the validity of ROH analyses. The effect of pruning for linkage disequilibrium and low minor allele frequencies on ROH analyses is highly population dependent and such pruning may result in missed ROH. PLINK’s minimal density requirement is crucial for medium density genotypes and if set too low, genome coverage of the ROH analysis is limited. Finally, we provide recommendations for the maximal gap, scanning window length and threshold settings. Conclusions: In this study, we present guidelines for an adequate and robust ROH analysis in PLINK on medium density SNP data. Furthermore, we advise to report parameter settings in publications, and to validate them prior to analysis. Moreover, we encourage authors to report genome coverage to reflect the ROH analysis’ validity. Implementing these guidelines will substantially improve the overall quality and uniformity of ROH analyses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.
Purcell, S., Neale, B., Todd-Brown, K., Thomas, L., Ferreira, M. A. R., Bender, D., Maller, J., Sklar, P., de Bakker, P. I. W., Daly, M. J., et al. (2007) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/519795 · Cited by 34,089
Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets
Chang, C. C., Chow, C. C., Tellier, L. C., Vattikuti, S., Purcell, S. M., & Lee, J. J. (2015) · Gigascience · doi:10.1186/s13742-015-0047-8 · Cited by 12,709
Principles of Population Genetics.
Cormack, R. M., Hartl, D. L., & Clark, A. G. (1990) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531471 · Cited by 5,242
Runs of Homozygosity in European Populations
McQuillan, R., Leutenegger, A.-L., Abdel-Rahman, R., Franklin, C. S., Pericic, M., Barac-Lauc, L., Smolej-Narancic, N., Janicijevic, B., Polasek, O., Tenesa, A., et al. (2008) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.08.007 · Cited by 1,369
Runs of homozygosity: windows into population history and trait architecture
Ceballos, F. C., Joshi, P. K., Clark, D. W., Ramsay, M., & Wilson, J. F. (2018) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2017.109 · Cited by 1,006
Kijas, J. W., Lenstra, J. A., Hayes, B., Boitard, S., Porto Neto, L. R., San Cristobal, M., Servin, B., McCulloch, R., Whan, V., Gietzen, K., et al. (2012) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001258 · Cited by 904
Runs of homozygosity and population history in cattle
Purfield, D. C., Berry, D. P., McParland, S., & Bradley, D. G. (2012) · BMC Genetics · doi:10.1186/1471-2156-13-70 · Cited by 653
Genomic Runs of Homozygosity Record Population History and Consanguinity
Kirin, M., McQuillan, R., Franklin, C. S., Campbell, H., McKeigue, P. M., & Wilson, J. F. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013996 · Cited by 552
Extended tracts of homozygosity in outbred human populations
Gibson, J., Morton, N. E., & Collins, A. (2006) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddi493 · Cited by 489
Runs of homozygosity reveal highly penetrant recessive loci in schizophrenia
Lencz, T., Lambert, C., DeRosse, P., Burdick, K. E., Morgan, T. V., Kane, J. M., Kucherlapati, R., & Malhotra, A. K. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0710021104 · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- Meyermans, R., Gorssen, W., Buys, N., & Janssens, S.
- Venue
- BMC Genomics
- Published
- 2020-01-29
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 94-94
- ISSN
- 1471-2164 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3014042482
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 19.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How to study runs of homozygosity using PLINK? A guide for analyzing medium density SNP data in livestock and pet species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12864-020-6463-x
- The paper
- Meyermans, R., Gorssen, W., Buys, N., & Janssens, S. (2020). How to study runs of homozygosity using PLINK? A guide for analyzing medium density SNP data in livestock and pet species. BMC Genomics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-6463-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.