The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Projecting future crop productivity for global economic modeling
Open accessAbstract
Assessments of climate change impacts on agricultural markets and land-use patterns rely on quantification of climate change impacts on the spatial patterns of land productivity. We supply a set of climate impact scenarios on agricultural land productivity derived from two climate models and two biophysical crop growth models to account for some of the uncertainty inherent in climate and impact models. Aggregation in space and time leads to information losses that can determine climate change impacts on agricultural markets and land-use patterns because often aggregation is across steep gradients from low to high impacts or from increases to decreases. The four climate change impact scenarios supplied here were designed to represent the most significant impacts (high emission scenario only, assumed ineffectiveness of carbon dioxide fertilization on agricultural yields, no adjustments in management) but are consistent with the assumption that changes in agricultural practices are covered in the economic models. Globally, production of individual crops decrease by 10–38% under these climate change scenarios, with large uncertainties in spatial patterns that are determined by both the uncertainty in climate projections and the choice of impact model. This uncertainty in climate impact on crop productivity needs to be considered by economic assessments of climate change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J., & Meehl, G. A. (2012) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-11-00094.1 · Cited by 14,052
The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment
Moss, R. H., Edmonds, J. A., Hibbard, K. A., Manning, M. R., Rose, S. K., van Vuuren, D. P., Carter, T. R., Emori, S., Kainuma, M., Kram, T., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08823 · Cited by 6,467
The DSSAT cropping system model
Jones, J. W., Hoogenboom, G., Porter, C. H., Boote, K. J., Batchelor, W. D., Hunt, L. A., Wilkens, P. W., Singh, U., Gijsman, A. J., & Ritchie, J. T. (2003) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s1161-0301(02)00107-7 · Cited by 4,465
RCP 8.5—A scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions
Riahi, K., Rao, S., Krey, V., Cho, C., Chirkov, V., Fischer, G., Kindermann, G., Nakicenovic, N., & Rafaj, P. (2011) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0149-y · Cited by 2,791
Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE
Leakey, A. D. B., Ainsworth, E. A., Bernacchi, C. J., Rogers, A., Long, S. P., & Ort, D. R. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erp096 · Cited by 1,678
A trend-preserving bias correction – the ISI-MIP approach
Hempel, S., Frieler, K., Warszawski, L., Schewe, J., & Piontek, F. (2013) · Earth System Dynamics · doi:10.5194/esd-4-219-2013 · Cited by 1,238
Nonlinear heat effects on African maize as evidenced by historical yield trials
Lobell, D. B., Bänziger, M., Magorokosho, C., & Vivek, B. (2011) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1043 · Cited by 1,206
Lotze‐Campen, H., Müller, C., Bondeau, A., Rost, S., Popp, A., & Lucht, W. (2008) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00336.x · Cited by 325
Self-citation
Cited by
Harmonization of global land use change and management for the period 850–2100 (LUH2) for CMIP6
Hurtt, G. C., Chini, L., Sahajpal, R., Frolking, S., Bodirsky, B. L., Calvin, K., Doelman, J. C., Fisk, J., Fujimori, S., Klein Goldewijk, K., et al. (2020) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-13-5425-2020 · Cited by 1,204
Food Security and Food Production Systems
(2015) · Climate Change 2014 Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107415379.012 · Cited by 818
Impacts of climate change on the livestock food supply chain; a review of the evidence
Godde, C. M., Mason-D’Croz, D., Mayberry, D. E., Thornton, P. K., & Herrero, M. (2021) · Global Food Security · doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100488 · Cited by 768
Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): An energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century
Kriegler, E., Bauer, N., Popp, A., Humpenöder, F., Leimbach, M., Strefler, J., Baumstark, L., Bodirsky, B. L., Hilaire, J., Klein, D., et al. (2017) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.015 · Cited by 735
Self-citationThe Challenge of Feeding the World
Fróna, D., Szenderák, J., & Harangi-Rákos, M. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11205816 · Cited by 584
Metadata
- Authors
- Müller, C., & Robertson, R. D.
- Venue
- Agricultural Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-12-10
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-50
- ISSN
- 0169-5150 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2155861221
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 19.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Projecting future crop productivity for global economic modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/agec.12088
- The paper
- Müller, C., & Robertson, R. D. (2014). Projecting future crop productivity for global economic modeling. Agricultural Economics. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12088
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
