Cited by 39Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPhysical Activity and HealthGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Exploring the effect of aquatic exercise on behaviour and psychological well‐being in people with moderate to severe dementia: A pilot study of the Watermemories Swimming C lub

Neville, Christine, Henwood, Tim, Beattie, Elizabeth, Fielding, Elaine·2014·Australasian Journal on Ageing

Abstract

Aim: To explore the effects of a dementia‐specific, aquatic exercise intervention on behavioural and psychological symptoms in people with dementia (BPSD). Method: Residents from two aged care facilities in Queensland, A ustralia, received a 12‐week intervention consisting of aquatic exercises for strength, agility, flexibility, balance and relaxation. The Psychological Well‐Being in Cognitively Impaired Persons Scale (PW‐BCIP) and the Revised Memory and Behaviour Problems Checklist (RMBPC) were completed by registered nurses at baseline, week 6, week 9 and post intervention. Results: Ten women and one man (median age = 88.4 years, interquartile range = 12.3) participated. Statistically significant declines in the RMBPC and PW‐BCIP were observed over the study period. Conclusion: Preliminary evidence suggests that a dementia‐specific, aquatic exercise intervention reduces BPSD and improves psychological well‐being in people with moderate to severe dementia. With further testing, this innovative intervention may prove effective in addressing some of the most challenging aspects of dementia care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ajag.12076

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aquatic exercise identified a significant decrease in the number of BPSD (p = 0.001), improvement in psychological wellbeing, and reduction in staff distress associated with BPSD (p = 0.001).

    “This study identified a significant decrease in the number of BPSD (p = 0.001), improvement in psychological wellbeing, and reduction in staff distress associated with BPSD (p = 0.001).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neville, C., Henwood, T., Beattie, E., & Fielding, E.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • School of Nursing and Midwifery The University of Queensland Ipswich Queensland Australia
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Neville, Christine
Venue
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-07-03
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
124-127
ISSN
  • 0726-4240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-6381
  • 1741-6612
OpenAlex
W1916222360
Cited by
39
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian Journal on Ageing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Queensland
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
aquatic exercise, dementia, behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, psychological well-being, nursing home residents, exercise intervention, dementia care
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cognition, Dementia, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Mental Health, Pilot Projects, Queensland, Severity of Illness Index, Swimming Pools, Time Factors, Geriatric Assessment, Treatment Outcome, Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review