Differential response of seven duiker species to human activities in Taï National Park, Côte d’Ivoire
Abstract
African rainforest is severely impacted by human activities, ranging from resource collection, selective logging to fragmentation and scale deforestation. Consequently, large mammal communities occurring therein are strongly modified. Here, we present a study conducted in Taï National Park (TNP), which characterises the spatial distribution and differential response of seven duiker species to human activities. Based on extensive survey data recorded between 2005 and 2015, we used a maximum entropy modelling approach for predicting duiker species distribution and a hierarchical clustering approach to identify potential subgroups in the duiker community. The seven duiker species clearly differed in their spatial distribution, with Cephalophus dorsalis and Philantomba maxwellii being the most common and widely distributed with no clear response towards gradients of impact from human activities. In contrast, Cephalophus ogilbyi, Cephalophus jentinki, Cephalophus sylvicultor and Cephalophus zebra showed increasing responses towards anthropogenic impact gradients, with the latter two being particularly sensitive. These duikers are not found in areas of illegal human activities. The restricted distribution of Cephalophus niger seems artificial and may indicate species misidentification. The strong spatial signature of human activities in the duiker community of TNP is of concern. Effective park management, including extensive ranger patrols, is vital for ensuring the persistence of…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The systematic grid design of 1 × 1 km squares has historically been used for biomonitoring in Taï NP and elsewhere in the Upper Guinean rainforest.
“This design has historically been used for biomonitoring both in Taï NP (Bogui et al., 2016; Diarrassouba et al., 2019) and elsewhere in the Upper Guinean rainforest (Furnell et al., 2015).”
From Fine-scale habitat requirements of the pygmy hippopotamus (Choeropsis liberiensis): Implications for rainforest conservation in West Africa (2026) · cites this paper as Diarrassouba et al., 2019
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kempkes, J. B., Si, Y., van ’t Zelfde, M., Digbeu, H. E. O., Bogui, E. B., Ouattara, K., Koné, I., & Paris, M. (2026) · Global Ecology and Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2026.e04346
Self-citation
- Authors
- Diarrassouba, A., Gnagbo, A., Célestin Kouakou, Y., Campbell, G., Tiedoué, M. R., Tondossama, A., Kühl, H. S., & Koné, I.
- Affiliations
- Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny (CI)
- Swiss Centre for Scientific Research (CI)
- Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques Abidjan Côte d’Ivoire
- The Biodiversity Consultancy Cambridge UK
- Office Ivoirien des Parcs et Réserves Abidjan Côte d’Ivoire
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Diarrassouba, Abdoulaye
- ORCID
- Venue
- African Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-07-09
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 58-68
- ISSN
- 0141-6707 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2028
- OpenAlex
- W2960662349
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 0.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- African Journal of Ecology (publishedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Keywords
- duikers, Cephalophus, human disturbance, species distribution modeling, spatial distribution, Taï National Park, protected area management, African rainforest
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review