Cited by 22Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUterine Myomas and TreatmentsGynecological conditions and treatments

Pelvic organ prolapse in nulliparae

Open access
Dietz, Hans Peter, Chavez‐Coloma, Leilani, Friedman, Talia, Turel, Friyan·2022·Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Abstract

Background: Pregnancy and childbirth are thought to be the strongest environmental risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse, but prolapse does occur in nulliparae. Aim: To characterise prolapse in vaginal nulliparae. Material and methods: This was a retrospective study using archived clinical and imaging data of 368 vaginally nulliparous women seen between 2006 and 2017 at two tertiary urogynaecological centres. Patients underwent a standardised interview, clinical examination and 3D/4D translabial ultrasound. Volume datasets were analysed by the second author, blinded against all clinical data, using post‐processing software on a personal computer. Significant prolapse was defined as Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system stage ≥2 for the anterior and posterior compartment, and stage ≥1 for the central compartment. On imaging, significant prolapse was defined as previously described. Results: Of 4297 women seen during the inclusion period, 409 were vaginally nulliparous, for whom 368 volume data sets could be retrieved. Mean age was 50 years (17–89) and mean body mass index 29 (16–64). Eighty‐one (22%) presented with prolapse symptoms. On clinical examination, 106 women (29%) had significant prolapse, mostly of the posterior compartment (n = 70, 19%). On imaging 64 women showed evidence of significant prolapse (17%), again mostly posterior (n = 47, 13%). Rectovaginal septal defects were even more common in 69 (19%). On multivariate analysis we found no differences between true nulliparae (n = 184) and women delivered exclusively by caesarean section (n = 184). Conclusions: Prolapse occurs in vaginal nulliparae, but it has distinct characteristics. Rectocele predominates, while cystocele and uterine prolapse are uncommon. Pregnancy and caesarean delivery seem to have little effect.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ajo.13481

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies have found that POP is also prevalent in nullipara women.

    “Somewhat surprisingly, studies have found that POP is also prevalent in nullipara women [77].”

    From International urogynecology consultation chapter 3 committee 2; conservative treatment of patient with pelvic organ prolapse: Pelvic floor muscle training (2022) · cites this paper as [77]

    The Discussion (Main findings) says POP is not rare in nulliparae seen at a urogynaecological clinic, and the Results (Table 2) report significant prolapse in 47 of 182 women with no births. The claim omits that clinic setting and implies prevalence among nulliparous women generally; the Discussion (Interpretation) describes prevalence in nulliparae as low outside that context. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]Roman C. Le prolapsus des nullipares, a propos de treize observations. Bull Fed Soc Gynecol Obstet Lang Fr 1969; 21(3): 259– 260. 5400355

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dietz, H. P., Chavez‐Coloma, L., Friedman, T., & Turel, F.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • University of Sydney Sydney NSW Australia
Corresponding author
Dietz, Hans Peter
Venue
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-01-20
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
420-425
ISSN
  • 0004-8666 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-828X
OpenAlex
W4205969794
Cited by
21
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Sydney
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
Keywords
pelvic organ prolapse, nulliparous women, rectocele, cystocele, uterine prolapse, cesarean section, pregnancy, pelvic floor
MeSH terms
Cesarean Section, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Ultrasonography, Pelvic Floor, Cystocele, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review