Cited by 4Physical Activity and HealthMental Health and Patient InvolvementMental Health Treatment and Access

Active8: promoting health beyond the absence of mental illness

Ennals, Priscilla, Muchamore, Ian, Langan, Vicki, Hall, Cristal, Wolstencroft, Keren·2020·Australian Journal of Rural Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to understand and develop the critical elements of a program designed to promote physical health for people living with or experiencing mental illness. DESIGN: The study used a most significant change approach. Participants provided personal accounts of change, and these were analysed in a workshop with a range of stakeholders involved in program design and delivery. Core themes were identified to inform the development of the program. SETTING: The program is delivered by a community managed organisation in the South Eastern Illawarra region of New South Wales and the study took place in this setting. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included people who had accessed the Active8 program, staff who delivered the program, referrers and the funder of the program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants were invited to share stories of how the Active8 program had impacted them or the people they were supporting. RESULTS: Five key themes were identified as being critical to program success and development: (a) the right start at the right time; (b) a program that fits me; (c) health literacy leads to agency, action and change; (d) a chance to explore and establish healthy connections; and (e) change requires time, focus and ongoing support. CONCLUSION: Approaches that steer away from simple advice giving and towards empowering and motivating people in line with their individual needs, aspirations and social context show potential for enhancing health-behaviour change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ajr.12576

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Ennals, P., Muchamore, I., Langan, V., Hall, C., & Wolstencroft, K.
Affiliations
  • Neami National (AU)
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Ennals, Priscilla
Venue
Australian Journal of Rural Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-01-14
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
215-217
ISSN
  • 1038-5282 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1584
OpenAlex
W3000691553
Cited by
4
References
10
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian Journal of Rural Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
physical health promotion, mental illness, health behavior change, health literacy, empowerment, program development, stakeholder engagement, rural health
MeSH terms
Empowerment, Mental Disorders, Health Promotion, Humans, Motivation, Health Behavior, Program Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review