Stress and coping in Australian male farmers
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Farmers face high levels of stress, often related to unique farming industry stressors. Coping strategies in dealing with stress, can be less (avoidant) or more (approach) effective. No previous research has investigated coping strategies across a range of farming‐specific stressors. Objective: To determine levels of stress in various categories and the relationship between these stressors and coping strategies used. Design: Cross‐sectional survey, using self‐report questionnaire. Independent variables included five stressor categories, and two types of coping. Participants: One hundred and twenty‐five rural male farmers, over 18 years of age, across Australia. Main Outcome Measures: Demographic data were collected in addition to responses regarding stress and coping. The Australian Family Farming Stressor Scale, comprising five stressor categories, measured the stressors unique to Australian farming. The Brief COPE (B‐COPE) measured approach and avoidant coping strategies. Results: A total of 125 responses to the survey were analysed, with ages ranging from 19 to 84. While varying levels of stress were found in all stressor categories, Daily Stressors rated highest, followed by Financial Stressors. Higher levels of avoidant coping were utilised for Family Stressors, whereas higher levels of approach coping were utilised for farm‐related stressors. Conclusions: Findings indicate that the rating of stressors may be determined by current affairs, such as Daily Stressors rating highest. This could be due to the lack of available workforce during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Furthermore, coping strategy findings could better inform clinical practice in assisting farmers in utilising their approach coping skills across all stressors.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The role of masculinity in men's help-seeking for depression: A systematic review
Seidler, Z. E., Dawes, A. J., Rice, S. M., Oliffe, J. L., & Dhillon, H. M. (2016) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2016.09.002 · Cited by 1,093 · see citing works
Key Risk Factors Affecting Farmers’ Mental Health: A Systematic Review
Daghagh Yazd, S., Wheeler, S. A., & Zuo, A. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16234849 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Mitten, M. A., & Molenberghs, P.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Social Neuroscience, ISN Psychology Ivanhoe Victoria Australia
- Corresponding author
- Mitten, Michele Anne
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Rural Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2024-12-16
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e13207-e13207
- ISSN
- 1038-5282 (ISSN-L)
- 1440-1584
- OpenAlex
- W4405478304
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Australian Journal of Rural Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture and Farm Safety
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
- Keywords
- farmer stress, coping strategies, approach coping, avoidance coping, financial stress, daily hassles, family stress, Brief COPE, male farmers, rural mental health
- MeSH terms
- Farmers, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Australia, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Rural Population, Stress, Psychological, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review