Cited by 1,093Gender Roles and Identity StudiesMental Health Treatment and AccessGender and Feminist Studies

The role of masculinity in men's help-seeking for depression: A systematic review

Seidler, Zac E., Dawes, Alexei J., Rice, Simon M., Oliffe, John L., Dhillon, Haryana M.·2016·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

Aim Conformity to traditional masculine gender norms may deter men's help-seeking and/or impact the services men engage. Despite proliferating research, current evidence has not been evaluated systematically. This review summarises findings related to the role of masculinity on men's help-seeking for depression.Method Six electronic databases were searched using terms related to masculinity, depression and help-seeking. Titles and abstracts were reviewed and data systematically extracted and examined for methodological quality.Results Of 1927 citations identified, 37 met inclusion criteria. Seventeen (46%) studies reported qualitative research; eighteen (49%) employed quantitative methods, and two (5%) mixed methods. Findings suggest conformity to traditional masculine norms has a threefold effect on men experiencing depression, impacting: i) their symptoms and expression of symptoms; ii) their attitudes to, intention, and, actual help-seeking behaviour; and, iii) their symptom management.Conclusion Results demonstrate the problematic impact of conformity to traditional masculine norms on the way men experience and seek help for depression. Tailoring and targeting clinical interventions may increase men's service uptake and the efficacy of treatments. Future research examining factors associated with men's access to, and engagement with depression care will be critical to increasing help-seeking, treatment uptake, and effectual self-management among men experiencing depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.09.002

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seidler, Z. E., Dawes, A. J., Rice, S. M., Oliffe, J. L., & Dhillon, H. M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Seidler, Zac E.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
49
Pages
106-118
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2518948616
Cited by
1,093
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 179 · 2025: 174 · 2024: 136 · 2023: 111 · 2022: 121 · 2021: 119 · 2020: 136 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 1
FWCI
10.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
masculinity, help-seeking, masculine norms, help-seeking barriers, presenting symptoms, help-seeking intentions, treatment uptake, self-management
MeSH terms
Help-Seeking Behavior, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Male, Men, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Young Adult, Masculinity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review