Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,350

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Banff 2013 Meeting Report: Inclusion of C4d-Negative Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Antibody-Associated Arterial Lesions

Open access
Haas, M., Sis, B., Racusen, L.C., Solez, K., Glotz, D., Colvin, R.B., Castro, M.C.R., David, D.S.R., David-Neto, E., Bagnasco, S.M., Cendales, L.C., Cornell, L.D., Demetris, A.J., Drachenberg, C.B., Farver, C.F., Farris, A.B., Gibson, I.W., Kraus, E., Liapis, H., Loupy, A., Nickeleit, V., Randhawa, P., Rodriguez, E.R., Rush, D., Smith, R.N., Tan, C.D., Wallace, W.D., Mengel, M.·2014·American Journal of Transplantation

Abstract

The 12th Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology was held in Comandatuba, Brazil, from August 19-23, 2013, and was preceded by a 2-day Latin American Symposium on Transplant Immunobiology and Immunopathology. The meeting was highlighted by the presentation of the findings of several working groups formed at the 2009 and 2011 Banff meetings to: (1) establish consensus criteria for diagnosing antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in the presence and absence of detectable C4d deposition; (2) develop consensus definitions and thresholds for glomerulitis (g score) and chronic glomerulopathy (cg score), associated with improved inter-observer agreement and correlation with clinical, molecular and serological data; (3) determine whether isolated lesions of intimal arteritis ("isolated v") represent acute rejection similar to intimal arteritis in the presence of tubulointerstitial inflammation; (4) compare different methodologies for evaluating interstitial fibrosis and for performing/evaluating implantation biopsies of renal allografts with regard to reproducibility and prediction of subsequent graft function; and (5) define clinically and prognostically significant morphologic criteria for subclassifying polyoma virus nephropathy. The key outcome of the 2013 conference is defining criteria for diagnosis of C4d-negative ABMR and respective modification of the Banff classification. In addition, three new Banff Working Groups were initiated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ajt.12590

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,350

Metadata

Authors
Haas, M., Sis, B., Racusen, L. C., Solez, K., Glotz, D., Colvin, R. B., Castro, M. C. R., David, D. S. R., David-Neto, E., Bagnasco, S. M., Cendales, L. C., Cornell, L. D., Demetris, A. J., Drachenberg, C. B., Farver, C. F., Farris, A. B., Gibson, I. W., Kraus, E., Liapis, H., Loupy, A., Nickeleit, V., Randhawa, P., Rodriguez, E. R., Rush, D., Smith, R. N., Tan, C. D., Wallace, W. D., & Mengel, M.
Venue
American Journal of Transplantation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
272-283
ISSN
1600-6135 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1737600104
Cited by
1,350
References
0
FWCI
187.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Banff 2013 Meeting Report: Inclusion of C4d-Negative Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Antibody-Associated Arterial Lesions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ajt.12590
The paper
Haas, M., Sis, B., Racusen, L. C., Solez, K., Glotz, D., Colvin, R. B., Castro, M. C. R., David, D. S. R., David-Neto, E., Bagnasco, S. M., Cendales, L. C., Cornell, L. D., Demetris, A. J., Drachenberg, C. B., Farver, C. F., Farris, A. B., Gibson, I. W., Kraus, E., Liapis, H., . . . Mengel, M. (2014). Banff 2013 Meeting Report: Inclusion of C4d-Negative Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Antibody-Associated Arterial Lesions. American Journal of Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.12590

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.