Cited by 176Pancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Management and Research

Long-Term Follow-Up of the Edmonton Protocol of Islet Transplantation in the United States

Open access
Brennan, D.C., Kopetskie, H.A., Sayre, P.H., Alejandro, R., Cagliero, E., Shapiro, A.M.J., Goldstein, J.S., DesMarais, M.R. +2 more·2016·American Journal of Transplantation

Abstract

We report the long-term follow-up of the efficacy and safety of islet transplantation in seven type 1 diabetic subjects from the United States enrolled in the multicenter international Edmonton Protocol who had persistent islet function after completion of the Edmonton Protocol. Subjects were followed up to 12 years with serial testing for sustained islet allograft function as measured by C-peptide. All seven subjects demonstrated continued islet function longer than a decade from the time of first islet transplantation. One subject remained insulin independent without the need for diabetic medications or supplemental transplants. One subject who was insulin-independent for over 8 years experienced graft failure 10.9 years after the first islet transplant. The remaining six subjects demonstrated continued islet function upon trial completion, although three had received a supplemental islet transplant each. At trial completion, five subjects were receiving insulin and two remained insulin independent, although one was treated with liraglutide. The median hemoglobin A1c was 6.3% (45 mmol/mol). All subjects experienced progressive decline in the C-peptide/glucose ratio. No patients experienced severe hypoglycemia, opportunistic infection, or lymphoma. Thus, although the rate and duration of insulin independence was low, the Edmonton Protocol was safe in the long term. Alternative approaches to islet transplantation are under investigation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ajt.13458

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All but one of the Edmonton Protocol patients required supplemental insulin 10 years post-transplant, but all recipients retained some graft function that provided substantial benefits to glucose control and elimination of severe hypoglycemic events.

    “Although all but one of these patients required supplemental insulin 10 years post-transplant, all recipients retained some level of graft function that provided substantial benefits to glucose control and elimination of severe hypoglycemic events.17”

    From Developments in stem cell-derived islet replacement therapy for treating type 1 diabetes (2023) · cites this paper as [17]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

8 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [6]6. Hamlett AC, Ryan L, Wolfinger R. On the use of PROC MIXED to estimate correlation in the presence of repeated measures. Paper presented at: 29th Annual SAS Users Group International Conference; May 2004; Montréal, Canada. Google Scholar

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brennan, D. C., Kopetskie, H. A., Sayre, P. H., Alejandro, R., Cagliero, E., Shapiro, A. M. J., Goldstein, J. S., DesMarais, M. R., Booher, S., & Bianchine, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Rho (United States) (US)
  • Immune Tolerance Network (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (US)
Corresponding author
Brennan, D.C.
Venue
American Journal of Transplantation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
509-517
ISSN
1600-6135 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128934917
Cited by
176
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
19.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Transplantation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NO1-AI-15416)
  • National Institutes of Health (HSN272200800029C)
  • Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Australia
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
islet transplantation, Edmonton protocol, type 1 diabetes, C-peptide, insulin independence, graft failure, long-term follow-up, liraglutide, hypoglycemia, HbA1c
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, C-Peptide, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Graft Survival, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Islets of Langerhans Transplantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review