Cited by 48AI in cancer detectionArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Banff Digital Pathology Working Group: Going Digital in Transplant Pathology

Open access
Farris, Alton B., Moghe, Ishita, Wu, Simon, Hogan, Julien, Cornell, Lynn D., Alexander, Mariam P., Kers, Jesper, Demetris, Anthony J. +5 more·2020·American Journal of Transplantation

Abstract

The Banff Digital Pathology Working Group (DPWG) was formed in the time leading up to and during the joint American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics/Banff Meeting, September 23-27, 2019, held in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. At the meeting, the 14th Banff Conference, presentations directly and peripherally related to the topic of "digital pathology" were presented; and discussions before, during, and after the meeting have resulted in a list of issues to address for the DPWG. Included are practice standardization, integrative approaches for study classification, scoring of histologic parameters (eg, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy and inflammation), algorithm classification, and precision diagnosis (eg, molecular pathways and therapeutics). Since the meeting, a survey with international participation of mostly pathologists (81%) was conducted, showing that whole slide imaging is available at the majority of centers (71%) but that artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning was only used in ≈12% of centers, with a wide variety of programs/algorithms employed. Digitalization is not just an end in itself. It also is a necessary precondition for AI and other approaches. Discussions at the meeting and the survey highlight the unmet need for a Banff DPWG and point the way toward future contributions that can be made.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ajt.15850

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farris, A. B., Moghe, I., Wu, S., Hogan, J., Cornell, L. D., Alexander, M. P., Kers, J., Demetris, A. J., Levenson, R. M., Tomaszewski, J., Barisoni, L., Yagi, Y., & Solez, K.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of California Davis Medical Center (US)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Farris, Alton B.
Venue
American Journal of Transplantation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
20
Issue
9
Pages
2392-2399
ISSN
1600-6135 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3011545441
Cited by
48
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Transplantation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (R33CA202881, P30CA008748)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB028635)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
digital pathology, kidney transplantation, whole slide imaging, artificial intelligence in pathology, machine learning, Banff classification, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, precision diagnostics, molecular pathways, standardization of practice
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Biopsy, Graft Rejection, Humans, Kidney Diseases, Pennsylvania, Kidney Transplantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review