Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 935

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

International Con sensus on drug allergy

Open access
Demoly, P., Adkinson, N. F., Brockow, K., Castells, M., Chiriac, A. M., Greenberger, P. A., Khan, D. A., Lang, D. M., Park, H.‐S., Pichler, W., Sanchez‐Borges, M., Shiohara, T., Thong, B. Y.‐H.·2014·Allergy

Abstract

When drug reactions resembling allergy occur, they are called drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHR s) before showing the evidence of either drug‐specific antibodies or T cells.DHR s may be allergic or nonallergic in nature, with drug allergies being immunologically mediated DHR s. These reactions are typically unpredictable. They can be life‐threatening, may require or prolong hospitalization, and may necessitate changes in subsequent therapy. Both underdiagnosis (due to under‐reporting) and overdiagnosis (due to an overuse of the term ‘allergy’) are common. A definitive diagnosis of such reactions is required in order to institute adequate treatment options and proper preventive measures. Misclassification based solely on the DHR history without further testing may affect treatment options, result in adverse consequences, and lead to the use of more‐expensive or less‐effective drugs, in contrast to patients who had undergone a complete drug allergy workup. Several guidelines and/or consensus documents on general or specific drug class‐induced DHR s are available to support the medical decision process. The use of standardized systematic approaches for the diagnosis and management of DHR s carries the potential to improve outcomes and should thus be disseminated and implemented. Consequently, the I nternational C ollaboration in A sthma,A llergy and I mmunology (i CAALL), formed by the E uropean A cademy of A llergy and C linical I mmunology (EAACI), the A merican A cademy of A llergy,A sthma and I mmunology (AAAAI), the A merican C ollege of A llergy,A sthma and I mmunology (ACAAI), and the W orld A llergy O rganization (WAO), has decided to issue an I nternational CON sensus (ICON) on drug allergy. The purpose of this document is to highlight the key messages that are common to many of the existing guidelines, while critically reviewing and commenting on any differences and deficiencies of evidence, thus providing a comprehensive reference document for the diagnosis and management of DHRs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/all.12350

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 935

Metadata

Authors
Demoly, P., Adkinson, N. F., Brockow, K., Castells, M., Chiriac, A. M., Greenberger, P. A., Khan, D. A., Lang, D. M., Park, H. ‐., Pichler, W., Sanchez‐Borges, M., Shiohara, T., & Thong, B. Y. ‐.
Venue
Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-02-21
Volume
69
Issue
4
Pages
420-437
ISSN
  • 0105-4538 (ISSN-L)
  • 1398-9995
OpenAlex
W2108511018
Cited by
935
References
3
FWCI
38.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: International Con sensus on drug allergy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/all.12350
The paper
Demoly, P., Adkinson, N. F., Brockow, K., Castells, M., Chiriac, A. M., Greenberger, P. A., Khan, D. A., Lang, D. M., Park, H. ‐., Pichler, W., Sanchez‐Borges, M., Shiohara, T., & Thong, B. Y. ‐. (2014). International Con sensus on drug allergy. Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12350

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.