Cited by 130Urticaria and Related ConditionsMast cells and histamineEosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes

Effect of omalizumab on angioedema in H 1 ‐antihistamine‐resistant chronic spontaneous urticaria patients: results from X‐ ACT , a randomized controlled trial

Staubach, P., Metz, M., Chapman‐Rothe, N., Sieder, C., Bräutigam, M., Canvin, J., Maurer, M.·2016·Allergy

Abstract

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria ( CSU ) severely impacts quality of life (QoL), especially in patients with wheals and angioedema. Omalizumab is approved as add‐on therapy for CSU patients; however, its effect on patients who are double‐positive for wheals and angioedema has not been systematically studied. Objective: The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of omalizumab vs placebo at week 28 using the Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life ( CU ‐Q2oL) questionnaire. Number of angioedema‐burdened days, time interval between successive angioedema episodes, disease activity, angioedema‐specific and overall QoL impairment were secondary objectives. Methods: X‐ ACT was a phase III , randomized, double‐blind study conducted in 24 centres (Germany), which selectively included CSU patients with angioedema and wheals. Patients were randomized (1 : 1) to omalizumab 300 mg or placebo (every 4 weeks up to week 24) (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT 01723072). Results: Of the 91 patients randomized to omalizumab ( n = 44) or placebo ( n = 47) at baseline, 68 completed the 28‐week treatment phase (omalizumab, 35; placebo, 33). Omalizumab was superior to placebo in improving CU ‐Q2oL scores at week 28 ( P < 0.001). There was a threefold improvement in angioedema‐burdened days/week with omalizumab (0.3) vs placebo (1.1). The median time to first recurrence of angioedema was 57–63 days with omalizumab and <5 days with placebo. Omalizumab significantly improved angioedema‐specific QoL ( P < 0.001). The adverse events reported are in line with the established safety profile of omalizumab. Conclusion: Omalizumab was an effective treatment option for patients with moderate‐to‐severe CSU symptoms and angioedema unresponsive to high doses of antihistamine treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/all.12870

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Staubach, P., Metz, M., Chapman‐Rothe, N., Sieder, C., Bräutigam, M., Canvin, J., & Maurer, M.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • Novartis (Germany) (DE)
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
Corresponding author
Maurer, M.
Venue
Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03-31
Volume
71
Issue
8
Pages
1135-1144
ISSN
  • 0105-4538 (ISSN-L)
  • 1398-9995
OpenAlex
W2305541861
Cited by
130
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 9
FWCI
22.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Allergy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Novartis Pharma
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Urticaria and Related Conditions
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Mast cells and histamine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes
Keywords
omalizumab, chronic spontaneous urticaria, angioedema, quality of life, anti-IgE therapy, adjunctive therapy
MeSH terms
Omalizumab, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Angioedema, Chronic Disease, Drug Resistance, Female, Histamine H1 Antagonists, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Urticaria, Treatment Outcome, Anti-Allergic Agents, Retreatment, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review