The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How Does Dose Impact on the Severity of Food-Induced Allergic Reactions, and Can This Improve Risk Assessment for Allergenic Foods?: Report from an ILSI Europe Food Allergy Task Force Expert Group and Workshop
Abstract
Quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for food allergens has made considerable progress in recent years, yet acceptability of its outcomes remains stymied because of the limited extent to which it has been possible to incorporate severity as a variable. Reaction severity, particularly following accidental exposure, depends on multiple factors, related to the allergen, the host and any treatments, which might be administered. Some of these factors are plausibly still unknown. Quantitative risk assessment shows that limiting exposure through control of dose reduces the rates of reactions in allergic populations, but its impact on the relative frequency of severe reactions at different doses is unclear. Food challenge studies suggest that the relationship between dose of allergenic food and reaction severity is complex even under relatively controlled conditions. Because of these complexities, epidemiological studies provide very limited insight into this aspect of the dose‐response relationship. Emerging data from single‐dose challenges suggest that graded food challenges may overestimate the rate of severe reactions. It may be necessary to generate new data (such as those from single‐dose challenges) to reliably identify the effect of dose on severity for use in QRA. Success will reduce uncertainty in the susceptible population and improve consumer choice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures



Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“One critical factor is the concentration of the allergen in the food, as higher levels of allergenic proteins are more likely to elicit a stronger immune response.”
From Pollen–Food Allergy Syndrome: Allergens, Clinical Insights, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges (2024) · cites this paper as [78]
In the citing paper
“Another important determinant is the amount of food consumed, as consuming larger quantities of a triggering food increases the overall allergen load, thereby amplifying the risk and severity of the reaction [78].”
From Pollen–Food Allergy Syndrome: Allergens, Clinical Insights, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges (2024) · cites this paper as [78]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers.2011.https://doi.org/10.3000/19770677.l_2011.304.eng · DOI
- 10.1111/all.12924 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0278-6915(99)00120-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fct.2014.01.032 · DOI
- 10.1093/mutage/gep014 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fct.2006.09.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fct.2009.02.011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fct.2013.10.032 · DOI
- 10.1111/all.12437 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.nutres.2011.01.001 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2005.02312.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01254.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.10.017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.01.030 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2458-11-734 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.10.021 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.10.029 · DOI
- 10.1111/cea.12748 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00666.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2003.01795.x · DOI
- 10.1097/ACI.0b013e32832b88e7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.10.047 · DOI
- 10.1111/all.12532 · DOI
- 10.1111/all.12322 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03912.x · DOI
- 10.1186/s40413-015-0081-0 · DOI
- 10.1186/1710-1492-9-35 · DOI
- 10.1067/mai.2001.112031 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.01.021 · DOI
- 10.1111/cea.12211 · DOI
- 10.4065/78.2.221 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.05.017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.03.021 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.03.035 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13601-014-0043-6 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2012.02838.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fct.2015.02.023 · DOI
- 10.1111/all.12997 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.07.063 · DOI
- 10.1067/mai.2000.104941 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fct.2006.07.018 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01322.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pollen–Food Allergy Syndrome: Allergens, Clinical Insights, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges
Haidar, L., Bănărescu, C. F., Uța, C., Moldovan, S. I., Zimbru, E.-L., Zimbru, R.-I., Ciurariu, E., Georgescu, M., & Panaitescu, C. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15010066 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Dubois, A. E. J., Turner, P. J., Hourihane, J., Ballmer‐Weber, B., Beyer, K., Chan, C. ‐., Gowland, M. H., O'Hagan, S., Regent, L., Remington, B., Schnadt, S., Stroheker, T., & Crevel, R. W. R.
- Affiliations
- University Medical Centre Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
- Imperial College London London UK
- University College Cork Cork Ireland
- University Hospital Zürich Zürich Switzerland
- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
- Food Standards Agency London UK
- Allergy Action St Albans UK
- PepsiCo International Leicester UK
- Anaphylaxis Campaign Farnborough UK
- The Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO) Zeist The Netherlands
- German Allergy and Asthma Association (DAAB) Mönchengladbach DE
- Nestlé Lausanne Switzerland
- Unilever Bedford UK
- Venue
- Allergy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-02-09
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1383-1392
- ISSN
- 0105-4538
- 1398-9995
- PMC
- PMC6032860
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- International Life Sciences Institute Research Foundation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review