Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 9

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Democracy as the negation of discourse: Liberalism, clientelism, and agency in Brazil

ANSELL, AARON·2015·American Ethnologist
DOI 10.1111/amet.12164
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

People enact democracy when they undermine their customary speech forms. This is evident in a small municipality in rural northeastern Brazil, where village-dwelling cultivators and town activists are abandoning the practice of displaying electoral propaganda on their private homes because it evokes the shrill voices of domineering politicians and haranguing neighbors. An analysis of local associations among propaganda images, unpleasant voices, and broader genres of political communication finds that the widespread abandonment of propaganda images dramatizes the tension between liberal and illiberal imaginings of democracy in contemporary Brazil.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/amet.12164

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Adorno, 2008, [2003] Lectures on Negative Dialectics
  2. Berlin , Isaiah 1990 [1969] Four Essays on Liberty Oxford Oxford University Press
  3. Burdick, 1998, Blessed Anastâcia: Women, Race, and Christianity in Brazil
  4. Chambers, 2013, The Lessons of Rancière
  5. Derrida, 2005, Rogues: Two Essays on Reason. Pascale-Anne Brault and Michael Naas, trans
  6. Feld, 1982, Sounds and Sentiments: Birds, Weeping, Poetics, and Song in Kaluli Expression
  7. Forman, 1975, The Brazilian Peasantry
  8. Goffman, 1981, Forms of Talk
  9. Jakobson, 1960, Style in Language, 350
  10. 1993, Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics
  11. Martins, 1977, Masorca: O coronelismo e a violência no processo político brasileiro [Masorca: Coronelismo and violence in Brazil's political process]
  12. Mott, 1985, Piauí colonial: População, economia e sociedade [Colonial Piauí: Population, economy and society]
  13. Nicolau, 2002, A história do voto no Brasil [The history of the vote in Brazil]
  14. Palmeira, 1996, Política, facções e voto [Politics, factions and the vote]. In Antropologia, voto e representação popular [Anthropology, the vote, and popular representation], 41
  15. Rancière, 1999, Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Julie Rose, trans
  16. Salgado, 2006, Do outro lado do espelho: República, igualdade e propaganda eleitoral [From the other side of the mirror: Republic, equality and electoral propaganda], Ciência e Opinião, 3, 28
  17. 1994, The Senses Still: Perception and Memory as Material Culture in Modernity
  18. Sobrinho, 1946, O devassamento do Piauí [The occupation of Piauí]

Cited by

See all 9

Metadata

Authors
ANSELL, A.
Affiliations
Department of Religion and Culture Lane Hall 112; Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; (0227) 280 Alumni Mall Blacksburg VA 24061
Venue
American Ethnologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-10-26
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
688-702
ISSN
0094-0496
DOI
10.1111/amet.12164
Cited by
9
References
27
Language
en
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.