Cited by 67Airway Management and Intubation TechniquesTracheal and airway disordersAnesthesia and Sedative Agents

Comparison of seven videolaryngoscopes with the Macintosh laryngoscope in manikins by experienced and novice personnel

Open access
Pieters, B. M. A., Wilbers, N. E. R., Huijzer, M., Winkens, B., van Zundert, A. A. J.·2016·Anaesthesia

Abstract

Summary: Videolaryngoscopy is often reserved for ‘anticipated’ difficult airways, but thereby can result in a higher overall rate of complications. We observed 65 anaesthetists, 67 residents in anaesthesia, 56 paramedics and 65 medical students, intubating the trachea of a standardised manikin model with a normal airway using seven devices: Macintosh classic laryngoscope, Airtraq ® , Storz C‐ MAC ® , Coopdech VLP ‐100 ® , Storz C‐ MAC D‐Blade ® , GlideScope Cobalt ® , McGrath Series5 ® and Pentax AWS ® ) in random order. Time to and proportion of successful intubation, complications and user satisfaction were compared. All groups were fastest using devices with a Macintosh‐type blade. All groups needed significantly more attempts using the Airtraq and Pentax AWS (all p < 0.05). Devices with a Macintosh‐type blade (classic laryngoscope and C‐ MAC ) scored highest in user satisfaction. Our results underline the importance of variability in device performance across individuals and staff groups, which have important implications for which devices hospital providers should rationally purchase.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/anae.13413

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early mortality from trauma has essentially remained unchanged despite significant advances in prehospital care, injury prevention, and the development of trauma systems.

    “Despite significant advances in prehospital care, injury prevention, and the development of trauma systems, early mortality from trauma has essentially remained unchanged.3”

    From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [3]

    The available copy contains bibliographic information identifying a study of laryngoscopes in manikins, but no passage addressing early trauma mortality. Searches for the mortality statement and for prehospital care, injury prevention, and trauma systems found no matching passage; the claim cannot be verified from this copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pieters, B. M. A., Wilbers, N. E. R., Huijzer, M., Winkens, B., & van Zundert, A. A. J.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • St.Jans Gasthuis Weert (NL)
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • The University of Queensland, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia
Corresponding author
Pieters, B. M. A.
Venue
Anaesthesia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03-12
Volume
71
Issue
5
Pages
556-564
ISSN
  • 0003-2409 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2044
OpenAlex
W2293853959
Cited by
67
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 4
FWCI
12.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Anaesthesia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Tracheal and airway disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Keywords
video laryngoscopy, Macintosh laryngoscope, Airtraq, GlideScope, C-MAC, endotracheal intubation, manikin model, intubation time, intubation complications, user satisfaction, difficult airway
MeSH terms
Allied Health Personnel, Clinical Competence, Humans, Internship and Residency, Intubation, Intratracheal, Laryngoscopy, Manikins, Students, Medical, Laryngoscopes, Endpoint Determination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review