Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 459

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social media for rapid knowledge dissemination: early experience from the COVID ‐19 pandemic

Open access
Chan, A. K. M., Nickson, C. P., Rudolph, J. W., Lee, A., Joynt, G. M.·2020·Anaesthesia

Abstract

The current COVID-19 pandemic is threatening global health. Rates of infection outside of China are rapidly increasing, with confirmed cases reported in over 160 countries as of 19 March 2020 1. During the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) epidemic, 21% of the global cumulative case total were healthcare workers 2. However, a recent study from Wuhan, China reported that 1716 healthcare workers were infected with COVID-19, representing 3.8% of confirmed cases 3. During the SARS epidemic, it is likely that a lack of awareness and preparedness put healthcare workers at risk 4. Thus, delivering rapid, reliable information that addresses critical infection control issues is of key importance, and tracheal intubation is known to be associated with a high risk of transmission of viral infections to healthcare workers 5, 6. The challenge is how to transfer knowledge of current best practices to the people who need it most, at a pace equal to or better than the spreading epidemic. The paths for, and rate of dissemination of traditional scholarly publications 7, static websites and even email are known to be slow. During the SARS epidemic, worldwide internet access was well established, yet gaining access to potential medical users was largely reliant on email contact and personal communication 8. Well-designed free open access educational material should distil key information in a clear, actionable format, while paired with social media–powered dissemination using social networks, in addition to traditional communication methods. Utilising social media in this way has shown promise as a speedier alternative 9. The use of the principles of the Free Open Access Medical education (FOAM) networks further provide good examples of the effectiveness of making information freely available. We describe an example of an efficient and rapidly disseminated infographic describing a practical intubation guideline for use in operating theatres and other critical care areas during a pandemic. Preventing infection and promoting psychological well-being to front-line healthcare workers during an epidemic is essential and the negative psychological impact of SARS on healthcare workers was exacerbated by uncertainty and unfamiliarity with infection control measures 4. Infection of healthcare workers disproportionately increases work-load and reduces the capacity of staff and hospitals to continue to provide patient care 10. Well-designed infographics have the potential to provide concise and practical information to institutions and healthcare workers and are associated with higher reader preference and lower cognitive load 11, 12. They aid knowledge translation by increasing information retention according to the cognitive load theory and dual coding theory 11. Moreover, making infographics easily accessible, engaging, reusable and modifiable to fit local needs and user requirements is more likely to meet the imperatives of diffusion of innovation to combat the current pandemic 13. Prince of Wales Hospital is a tertiary, academic hospital in Hong Kong affiliated with The Chinese University of Hong Kong. The clinical staff had substantial outbreak experience during the SARS pandemic. Utilising this experience, and through iterative systems testing and improvement using in-situ simulation, the unit developed an infographic on the principles of airway management focusing on infection control for staff and patient safety in the context of COVID-19. We disseminated the infographic via social media including Twitter™ and WeChat™ (Fig. 1) and via the departmental website (http://www.aic.cuhk.edu.hk/covid19). The method of dissemination was rapidly and well received by the international community, resulting in locally facilitated translations into Italian, Portuguese, French, Spanish, German, Dutch, Polish, Serbian, Farsi, Turkish, traditional Chinese, simplified Chinese and Japanese. All translations were completed and made available for users within a 10-day period. Collaborations also enabled context-specific modifications of the infographic to merge with local practices. For example, double gloving was a technique that the Italian community requested, and the infographic was modified to accommodate this for the Italian translation. As of 19 March 2020, there have been 63,440 impressions on Twitter since publication on 19 February 2020, with many retweets and requests for sharing of the infographic at their respective institutions around the world. There have been 8614 page views on the departmental website since publication on 7 March 2020. More importantly, through social media platforms and personal communication, numerous reputable organisations, including the World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists, Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists, Australian Society of Anaesthetists, UK ICM Anaesthesia Covid-19 Collaboration, Brazilian Anaesthesiology Society, French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Med

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/anae.15057

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 459

Metadata

Authors
Chan, A. K. M., Nickson, C. P., Rudolph, J. W., Lee, A., & Joynt, G. M.
Venue
Anaesthesia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-03-31
Volume
75
Issue
12
Pages
1579-1582
ISSN
  • 0003-2409 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2044
OpenAlex
W3013030269
Cited by
459
References
13
FWCI
92.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social media for rapid knowledge dissemination: early experience from the COVID ‐19 pandemic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/anae.15057
The paper
Chan, A. K. M., Nickson, C. P., Rudolph, J. W., Lee, A., & Joynt, G. M. (2020). Social media for rapid knowledge dissemination: early experience from the COVID ‐19 pandemic. Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15057

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.