Cited by 52Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityCommunication and COVID-19 ImpactMisinformation and Its Impacts

Are People With Chronic Diseases Satisfied With the Online Health Information Related to COVID-19 During the Pandemic?

Open access
Kor, Patrick Pui Kin, Leung, Angela Yee Man, Parial, Laurence Lloyd, Wong, Eliza Mi Ling, Dadaczynski, Kevin, Okan, Orkan, Amoah, Padmore Adusei, Wang, Shan Shan +3 more·2021·Journal of Nursing Scholarship

Abstract

Purpose: A deluge of fake news and misinformation about the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) on the Internet poses challenges for the public in their search for reliable and relevant health information for taking protective measures, especially among people with chronic diseases (PWCD). This study aimed to (a) understand the satisfaction level of the online information related to COVID‐19 in people with and without chronic diseases; (b) explore information‐searching behavior and digital health literacy in PWCD; and (3) identify the possible predictors of information satisfaction among PWCD. Methods: This was a multicity, cross‐sectional study using an online survey with a convenience sample of people who (a) were 15 years of age or older and (b) had access to the Internet in mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macau. Findings: Four thousand four hundred and seventy‐two subjects completed the survey, of whom less than 50% felt satisfied with the online information. About 20% of respondents (n = 882) were diagnosed with at least one chronic disease and reported a lower level of information satisfaction (p = .003) than the people without chronic diseases. The majority of the PWCD obtained their online health information from social media. Higher digital health literacy (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 5.07), higher frequency of searches regarding symptoms of COVID‐19 (adjusted OR = 2.07), higher perceived importance of quickly learning from the information searched (adjusted OR = 1.63), and lower frequency of searches on the topic of dealing with psychological stress (adjusted OR = 0.54) were found to be predictors of information satisfaction among PWCD. Conclusions: The majority of PWCD sought online information related to COVID‐19 from social media, and their level of information satisfaction was significantly lower than among people without chronic diseases. Digital health literacy is a strong and significant predictor of information satisfaction. Clinical Relevance: To support PWCD, we not only have to provide them with clear and accurate information, but also promote their digital health literacy so that they may seek, understand, and appraise health information from the Internet to make appropriate health‐related judgments and decisions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jnu.12616

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Castro-Sánchez, E., Chang, P. W. S., Vila-Candel, R., Escobedo, A. A., & Holmes, A. H. (2016). Health literacy and infectious diseases: Why does it matter? International Journal of Infectious Diseases , 43 , 103-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2015.12.019 · DOI
  2. Chan, A. K. M., Nickson, C. P., Rudolph, J. W., Lee, A., & Joynt, G. M. (2020). Social media for rapid knowledge dissemination: Early experience from the COVID-19 pandemic. Anaesthesia , 75 , 1579-1582. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15057 · DOI
  3. Chen, Y.-Y., Li, C.-M., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2018). Health information obtained from the Internet and changes in medical decision making: Questionnaire development and cross-sectional survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research , 20 (2), e47.
  4. Gebel, C., Juenger, N., Wagner, U., & (2014). Informations- und engagementsbezogenes Medienhandeln von Jugendlichen [Information and engagement related media activities of young people]. Jugendliche und die Aneignung politischer Informationen in Online-Medien [Young people and the acquisition of political information in online media] , (53-136). Wiesbaden: Springer.
  5. Guan, W.-J., Liang, W.-H., Zhao, Y., Liang, H.-R., Chen, Z.-S., Li, Y.-M., … China Medical Treatment Expert Group for COVID-19. (2020). Comorbidity and its impact on 1590 patients with COVID-19 in China: A nationwide analysis. European Respiratory Journal , 55 (5), 2000547. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993 003.00547 -2020 · DOI
  6. Gupta, L., Gasparyan, A. Y., Misra, D. P., Agarwal, V., Zimba, O., & Yessirkepov, M. (2020). Information and misinformation on COVID-19: A cross-sectional survey study. Journal of Korean Medical Science , 35 (27), e256.
  7. Hallyburton, A., & Evarts, L. A. (2014). Gender and online health information seeking: A five survey meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet , 18 (2), 128142.
  8. Houston, T. K., & Allison, J. J. (2002). Users of Internet health information: Differences by health status. Journal of Medical Internet Research , 4 (2), e7.
  9. Kang C.Y., Yang S., Yuan J., Xu Li., Zhao X., Yang J. (2020). Patients with chronic illness urgently need integrated physical and psychological care during the COVID-19 outbreak. Asian Journal of Psychiatry , 51 , 102081. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102081. · DOI
  10. Kelley, K., Clark, B., Brown, V., & Sitzia, J. (2003). Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. International Journal for Quality in Health Care , 15 (3), 261-266. https://doi.org/10.1093/ intqh c/mzg031
  11. McCloud, R. F., Okechukwu, C. A., Sorensen, G., & Viswanath, K. (2016). Beyond access: Barriers to internet health information seeking among the urban poor. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association , 23 (6), 1053-1059.
  12. Norman, C. D., & Skinner, H. A. (2006). eHealth literacy: Essential skills for consumer health in a networked world. Journal of Medical Internet Research , 8 (2), e9.
  13. Orso, D., Federici, N., Copetti, R., Vetrugno, L., & Bove, T. (2020). Infodemic and the spread of fake news in the COVID-19-era. European Journal of Emergency Medicine , 27 (5), 327-328.
  14. Paakkari, L., & Okan, O. (2020). COVID-19: Health literacy is an underestimated problem. Lancet Public Health , 5 (5), e249-e250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S24682667(20)30086 -4 · DOI
  15. Richardson, S., Hirsch, J. S., Narasimhan, M., Crawford, J. M., McGinn, T., Davidson, K. W., … Zanos, T. P. (2020). Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City area. Journal of the American Medical Association , 323 (20), 2052-2059. https://doi.org/10.1001/ jama.2020.6775
  16. Singh, L., Bansal, S., Bode, L., Budak, C., Chi, G., Kawintiranon, K., Wang, Y. (2020). A first look at COVID-19 information and misinformation sharing on Twitter. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.13907. https:// arxiv.org/abs/2003.13907v1 · arXiv
  17. Traver, M., Basagoiti, I., Martinez-Millana, A., Fernández-Llatas, C., & Traver, V. (2016, August 16-20). Experiences of a general practitioner in the daily practice about digital health literacy. The real needs . Paper presented at the 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Orlando, Florida, August 16-20, 2016.
  18. Tustin, N. (2010). The role of patient satisfaction in online health information seeking. Journal of Health Communication , 15 (1), 3-17.
  19. van der Vaart, R., & Drossaert, C. (2017). Development of the Digital Health Literacy Instrument: Measuring a broad spectrum of health 1.0 and health 2.0 skills. Journal of Medical Internet Research , 19 (1), e27-e27. https://doi.org/10.2196/ jmir.6709
  20. Ventola, C. L. (2014). Social media and health care professionals: Benefits, risks, and best practices. P & T: A Peer-Reviewed Journal for Formulary Management , 39 (7), 491520.
  21. Wong, D. K. K., & Cheung, M. K. (2019). Online health information seeking and ehealth literacy among patients attending a primary care clinic in Hong Kong: A crosssectional survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research , 21 (3), e10831.
  22. Wong, J. I. S., Steitz, B. D., & Rosenbloom, S. T. (2019). Characterizing the impact of health literacy, computer ability, patient demographics, and portal usage on patient satisfaction with a patient portal. JAMIA Open , 2 (4), 456-464.
  23. Wu, Z., & McGoogan, J. M. (2020). Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: Summary of a report of 72,314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Journal of the American Medical Association , 323 (13), 1239-1242. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.2648 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Zaim, S., Chong, J. H., Sankaranarayanan, V., & Harky, A. (2020). COVID-19 and multiorgan response. Current Problems in Cardiology , 45 (8), 100618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcar diol.2020.100618 · DOI
  25. Zhang, X., Wen, D., Liang, J., & Lei, J. (2017). How the public uses social media WeChat to obtain health information in China: A survey study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making , 17 (Suppl. 2), 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s1291 1-017-0470-0 · DOI
  26. Zhao Y., Cheng S., Yu X., Xu H. (2020). Chinese Public's Attention to the COVID-19 Epidemic on Social Media: Observational Descriptive Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research , 22 (5), e18825. http://doi.org/10.2196/18825 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kor, P. P. K., Leung, A. Y. M., Parial, L. L., Wong, E. M. L., Dadaczynski, K., Okan, O., Amoah, P. A., Wang, S. S., Deng, R., Cheung, T. C. C., & Molassiotis, A.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • Fulda University of Applied Sciences (DE)
  • Bielefeld University (DE)
  • Lingnan University (HK)
  • Post doctoral fellow Centre for Gerontological Nursing School of Nursing Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hong Kong SAR China
  • Director Department of Nursing The 5th Affiliated Hospital of Zhuyi Medical University Zhuhai China
Corresponding author
Leung, Angela Yee Man
Venue
Journal of Nursing Scholarship
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-12-14
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
75-86
ISSN
  • 0363-2792 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-6546
  • 1547-5069
OpenAlex
W3113163374
Cited by
52
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 7
FWCI
8.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nursing Scholarship (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, chronic disease, online health information, information satisfaction, digital health literacy, information seeking, social media, health misinformation, psychological stress
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adult, China, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Personal Satisfaction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Internet, Consumer Health Information, Health Literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review