Cited by 56Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Biology and FertilityReproductive Health and Technologies

Reproductive outcome in globozoospermic men: update and prospects

Chansel‐Debordeaux, L., Dandieu, S., Bechoua, S., Jimenez, C.·2015·Andrology

Abstract

Infertility affects approximately 15% of couples in reproductive age. Male infertility is estimated to represent about 20% of the etiologies. Among them, a rare type of teratozoospermia known as globozoospermia leads to disappointing pregnancy outcomes. Morphological, physiological and genetic aspects of this severe disorder have been described. We undertook a complete review of the available data on the reproductive outcomes in globozoospermic patients. To this end, a literature review in both English and French, over a 20-year time period using PubMed/Medline, ScienceDirect, and Scopus was performed. A total of 45 publications describing 172 attempts of treatment with assisted reproduction techniques (ICSI or IMSI with or without oocyte activation) were identified. We reviewed 28 deliveries and 34 children. However, for these patients, the fertilization rate after ICSI remained low. The present review suggests that oocyte activation (in particular with calcium ionophore) could improve the pregnancy rate significantly when dealing with globozoospermia. Once the exact pathogenesis of human globozoospermia is clearly identified, it is likely that other treatments such as recombinant phospholipase C zeta (PLC zeta, PLCζ), which seems to be a promising biological tool, would be developed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/andr.12081

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chansel‐Debordeaux, L., Dandieu, S., Bechoua, S., & Jimenez, C.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux (FR)
  • CHU Dijon Bourgogne (FR)
Corresponding author
Chansel‐Debordeaux, L.
Venue
Andrology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-10-07
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
1022-1034
ISSN
  • 2047-2919 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-2927
OpenAlex
W1876415227
Cited by
56
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Andrology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
globozoospermia, male infertility, teratozoospermia, assisted reproduction, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, oocyte activation, calcium ionophore, fertilization rate, pregnancy rate, reproductive outcomes
MeSH terms
Female, Fertility, Humans, Infertility, Male, Male, Pregnancy, Reproduction, Risk Factors, Spermatogenesis, Spermatozoa, Treatment Outcome, Pregnancy Rate, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review