Cited by 29Extractivism and Socioeconomic IssuesLatin American Cultural PoliticsEnvironmental Movements and Political Ecology

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fragmented forests, fractured lives: ethno-territorial struggles and development in the pacific lowlands of Colombia

Open access
Asher, Kiran·2020·Antipode

Abstract

The culturally and ecologically diverse Pacific lowlands of Colombia are both the locus and product of key political economic and cultural political conjunctures. Twenty‐five years after they emerged in their current form, Afro‐Colombian ethnic and territorial struggles have become important icons of resistance to development and struggles for social change. But in Colombia as in other parts of the world, the rapid and violent expansion of capitalist accumulation and state power have had devastating consequences for the region's forests and communities—literally and epistemically fragmenting both. Based on long‐term fieldwork, this paper examines the ongoing and contentious co‐production of the Colombian Pacific region amidst the increasingly violent forces of neoliberal governmentality in the 21 st century. It shows that the Pacific lowlands are an example of “political forests” in the sense that they are a contested site and product of Afro‐Colombian cultural politics and state territorialisation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/anti.12470

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Barbary O, 2004, Gente Negra en Colombia: Dinámicas sociopolíticas en Cali y el Pacífico
  2. Devine J, Political forests: Decentering the state in the era of neoliberal conservation, Antipode
  3. Rivas N, 2004, Gente Negra en Colombia: Dinámicas sociopolíticas en Cali y el Pacífico, 327
  4. UNHCR (United Nations High Commission on Refugees), 2010, 2009 Global Trends: Refugees, Asylum‐seekers, Returnees, Internally Displaced and Stateless Persons
  5. Wilshusen P R, 2003, Contested Nature: Promoting International Biodiversity Conservation with Social justice in the 21st Century, 73

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Asher, K.
Affiliations
Department of Women, Gender, Sexuality Studies University of Massachusetts Amherst Amherst MA USA
Venue
Antipode
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-11-07
Volume
52
Issue
4
Pages
949-970
ISSN
  • 0066-4812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8330
OpenAlex
W2900225850
Cited by
29
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antipode (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Five College Women's Studies Research Center
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Extractivism and Socioeconomic Issues
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Latin American Cultural Politics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Environmental Movements and Political Ecology
Keywords
Afro-Colombian communities, neoliberal governmentality, forest fragmentation, resistance to development, cultural politics, capitalist accumulation, social change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review