The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Platform Capitalism’s Hidden Abode: Producing Data Assets in the Gig Economy
Open accessAbstract
In this article, we argue that the governance of gig work under conditions of financialised platform capitalism is characterised by a process that we call “dual value production”: the monetary value produced by the service provided is augmented by the use and speculative value of the data produced before, during, and after service provision. App‐governed gig workers hence function as pivotal conduits in software systems that produce digital data as a particular asset class. We reflect on the production of data assets and the unequal distribution of opportunities for their valorisation, after which we survey a number of strategies seeking data‐centric worker empowerment. These strategies, we argue, are crucial attempts to push back against platform capitalism’s domination, bankrolled by what we term “meta‐platforms”. Ultimately, it is the massive wealth and synergetic capacities of meta‐platforms that constitute the most formidable obstacle to worker power and social justice in increasingly data‐driven societies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Data colonialism: rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019) · Television & New Media · doi:10.1177/1527476418796632 · Cited by 1,617
Platform capitalism: The intermediation and capitalisation of digital economic circulation
Langley, P., & Leyshon, A. (2017) · Finance and Society · doi:10.2218/finsoc.v3i1.1936 · Cited by 989
Fourcade, M., & Healy, K. (2016) · Socio-Economic Review · doi:10.1093/ser/mww033 · Cited by 474
Cited by
Migration and Migrant Labour in the Gig Economy: An Intervention
van Doorn, N., Ferrari, F., & Graham, M. (2023) · Work, Employment and Society · doi:10.1177/09500170221096581 · Cited by 291
Self-citationGig work as migrant work: The platformization of migration infrastructure
van Doorn, N., & Vijay, D. (2024) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1177/0308518x211065049 · Cited by 209
Self-citationvan Doorn, N., & Chen, J. Y. (2021) · Socio-Economic Review · doi:10.1093/ser/mwab028 · Cited by 138
Big Tech: Four Emerging Forms of Digital Rentiership
Birch, K., & Cochrane, D. T. (2022) · Science as Culture · doi:10.1080/09505431.2021.1932794 · Cited by 121
At what price? Labour politics and calculative power struggles in on-demand food delivery
Doorn, N. V. (2020) · Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation · doi:10.13169/workorgalaboglob.14.1.0136 · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- van Doorn, N., & Badger, A.
- Venue
- Antipode
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-06-03
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1475-1495
- ISSN
- 0066-4812 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8330
- OpenAlex
- W3033766131
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 46.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Platform Capitalism’s Hidden Abode: Producing Data Assets in the Gig Economy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/anti.12641
- The paper
- van Doorn, N., & Badger, A. (2020). Platform Capitalism’s Hidden Abode: Producing Data Assets in the Gig Economy. Antipode. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12641
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.