Cited by 132Maternal and fetal healthcareMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsPregnancy and preeclampsia studies

Placenta accreta: incidence and risk factors in an area with a particularly high rate of cesarean section

Open access
Morlando, Maddalena, Sarno, Laura, Napolitano, Raffaele, Capone, Angela, Tessitore, Giovanni, Maruotti, Giuseppe M., Martinelli, Pasquale·2013·Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Placenta accreta is a rare and potentially life‐threatening complication of pregnancy characterized by abnormal adherence of the placenta to the uterine wall. A previously scarred uterus or an abnormal site of placentation in the lower segment is a major risk factor. The aim of this study was to investigate the change in the incidence of placenta accreta and associated risk factors along four decades, from the 1970s to 2000s, in a tertiary south Italian center. We analyzed all cases of placenta accreta in a sample triennium for each decade. The incidence increased from 0.12% during the 1970s, to 0.31% during the 2000s. During the same period, cesarean section rates increased from 17 to 64%. Prior cesarean section was the only risk factor showing a significant concomitant rise. Our results reinforce cesarean section as the most significant predisposing condition for placenta accreta.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/aogs.12080

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morlando, M., Sarno, L., Napolitano, R., Capone, A., Tessitore, G., Maruotti, G. M., & Martinelli, P.
Affiliations
Federico II University Hospital (IT)
Corresponding author
Martinelli, Pasquale
Venue
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-03-21
Volume
92
Issue
4
Pages
457-460
ISSN
  • 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0412
OpenAlex
W2059017204
Cited by
132
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4
FWCI
7.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Keywords
placenta accreta, incidence trends, risk factors, cesarean section, previous cesarean section, uterine scar, placental adherence, temporal trends
MeSH terms
Adult, Cesarean Section, Female, Postpartum Hemorrhage, Humans, Hysterectomy, Italy, Medical Records, Placenta Accreta, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Risk Factors, Incidence, Women's Health, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review