Effects of maternal smokeless tobacco use on selected pregnancy outcomes in Alaska Native women: a case–control study
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To examine the potential effects of prenatal smokeless tobacco use on selected birth outcomes. Design: A population‐based, case–control study using a retrospective medical record review. Population: Singleton deliveries 1997–2005 to Alaska Native women residing in western Alaska. Methods: Hospital discharge codes were used to identify potential case deliveries and a random control sample. Data on tobacco use and confirmation of pregnancy outcomes were abstracted from medical records for 1123 deliveries. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between tobacco use and pregnancy outcomes. Adjusted odds ratios ( OR ), 95% confidence intervals (95% CI ), and p ‐values were calculated. Main outcomes measures: Preterm delivery, pregnancy‐associated hypertension, and placental abruption. Results: In unadjusted analysis, smokeless tobacco use was not significantly associated with preterm delivery ( OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.97–2.15). After adjustment for parity, pre‐pregnancy body mass index, and maternal age, the point estimate was attenuated and remained non‐significant. No significant associations were observed between smokeless tobacco use and pregnancy‐associated hypertension (adjusted OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.56–1.51) or placental abruption (adjusted OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.53–2.33). Conclusions: Prenatal smokeless tobacco use does not appear to reduce risk of pregnancy‐associated hypertension or to substantially increase risk of abruption. An association between smokeless tobacco and preterm delivery could not be ruled out. Components in tobacco other than nicotine likely play a major role in decreased pre‐eclampsia risk in smokers. Nicotine adversely affects fetal neurodevelopment and our results should not be construed to mean that smokeless tobacco use is safe during pregnancy.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Smokeless tobacco use during pregnancy is associated with preterm birth, stillbirth, and orofacial clefts.
“These studies have found associations with preterm birth, stillbirth, and orofacial cleft defects”
From Developmental toxicity of nicotine: A transdisciplinary synthesis and implications for emerging tobacco products (2017) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Shah, N. R., & Bracken, M. B. (2000) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(00)70240-7 · Cited by 394 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In our study, we found no statistically significant associations between smokeless tobacco use and increased risk of preterm delivery, PAH or placental abruption, although the point estimate for smokeless tobacco and preterm delivery was similar to those previously reported (11,12).”
InfluentialSmokeless Tobacco Use and Risk of Stillbirth: A Cohort Study in Mumbai, India
Gupta, P. C., & Subramoney, S. (2006) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/01.ede.0000190545.19168.c4 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
England, L. J., Aagaard, K., Bloch, M., Conway, K., Cosgrove, K., Grana, R., Gould, T. J., Hatsukami, D., Jensen, F., Kandel, D., et al. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.11.013 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- England, L. J., Kim, S. Y., Shapiro‐Mendoza, C. K., Wilson, H. G., Kendrick, J. S., Satten, G. A., Lewis, C. A., Tucker, M. J., & Callaghan, W. M.
- Affiliations
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
- Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation (US)
- Corresponding author
- England, Lucinda J.
- Venue
- Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-03-29
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 648-655
- ISSN
- 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0412
- PMC
- PMC5881106
- OpenAlex
- W2090828140
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Keywords
- smokeless tobacco, prenatal tobacco use, pregnancy outcomes, preterm birth, gestational hypertension, placental abruption, Alaska Native women, nicotine, preeclampsia, fetal brain development, western Alaska
- MeSH terms
- Abruptio Placentae, Adult, Alaska, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Tobacco, Smokeless, Logistic Models, Case-Control Studies, Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced, Premature Birth, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review