Cited by 4

The Nordic medical birth registers—a potential goldmine for clinical research.

Langhoff-Roos·2014·Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/aogs.2014.93.issue-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Twins were excluded from the calculations because zygosity status was unavailable and twins are known to have an elevated risk of being diagnosed with ASD.

    “However, because we did not have information about zygosity status and because twins are well known to have an el-evated risk of being diagnosed with ASD 15 we excluded twins from our calculations.”
  • The validity and reliability of registry-based diagnoses, and case ascertainment, were reported in earlier publications.

    “Case ascertainment and reliability and validity of registry-reported diagnoses have been published previously.15,16”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Langhoff-Roos
Venue
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-02
Volume
93
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0412
OpenAlex
W4251653423
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
Type
paratext
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review