Cited by 40Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Neuropaediatric and neuroarchaeology: understanding development to correct brain disorders

Ben‐Ari, Yehezkel·2013·Acta Paediatrica

Abstract

The construction of the brain, with its 1015 synapses, follows a tight genetic programme. But at the same time, the neurons and networks follow a developmental sequence, from immature activities to adult ones. In essence, all voltage-gated and synapse-driven currents differ in young and adult neurons, and primitive networks generate patterns that have little to do with those that are relevant to adult behaviour. It is also clear that activity modulates the construction of functional units and neuronal ensembles, raising the fundamental question of the relationships and interactions between the genetic programme and activity. It has been suggested 1 that genes and activity have a checkpoint type of relationship, the latter confirming the validity of the former. In addition, there can be numerous errors in the formation of neuronal entities, and these are associated with severe neurological sequels. This raises the highly relevant clinical issue of the fate of neuronal ensembles that do not perform as they should do and end up misplaced and/or misconnected. How do these aberrant networks mature and how do they generate disorders? How do misplaced and/or misconnected neurons behave and malfunction to the extent that they exert adverse effects on the operation of the cortex? It has, for example, been suggested that these neurons remain 'frozen' in an immature state 1, 2, paving the way for interesting therapeutic advances. Of course, many other therapeutic advances have been sugg…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/apa.12161

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Disruption in neuronal and microbial organization in prenatal and postnatal periods of mammalian development may lead to the onset of neurodevelopmental and other brain disorders later in life.

    “disruption in the neuronal and microbial organization in prenatal and postnatal periods of mammalian development may lead to the onset of neurodevelopmental and other brain disorders later in life (9, 38–40).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ben‐Ari, Y.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Ben‐Ari, Yehezkel
Venue
Acta Paediatrica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-03-18
Volume
102
Issue
4
Pages
331-334
ISSN
  • 0365-1436 (ISSN-L)
  • 0803-5253
  • 1651-2227
OpenAlex
W2093833851
Cited by
40
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Paediatrica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
brain development, neurodevelopmental disorders, gene-environment interaction, neuronal ensembles, network plasticity, activity-dependent development, synaptogenesis, neuronal migration, gene therapy, stem cell therapy, neuromodulation, neuropaediatrics, mental illness
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Diseases, Biological Evolution, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Humans, Mutation, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Neurosciences, Synapses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review