Cited by 44Breastfeeding Practices and InfluencesInfant Development and Preterm CareInfant Nutrition and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Proactive telephone support provided to breastfeeding mothers of preterm infants after discharge: a randomised controlled trial

Open access
Ericson, Jenny, Eriksson, Mats, Hellström‐Westas, Lena, Hoddinott, Pat, Flacking, Renée·2018·Acta Paediatrica

Abstract

Aim: The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of proactive telephone support provided to breastfeeding mothers of preterm infants after discharge from neonatal intensive care units (NICU). Methods: Between March 2013 and December 2015, a randomised controlled trial was conducted at six NICUs across Sweden. At each NICU, a breastfeeding support team recruited, randomised and delivered the support to participating mothers. The intervention group received a daily proactive telephone call up to 14 days after discharge from the support team. The control group could initiate telephone contact themselves. Primary outcome was exclusive breastfeeding eight weeks after discharge. Secondary outcomes were maternal satisfaction with breastfeeding, attachment, quality of life and parental stress. Results: In total, 493 mothers were randomised, 231 to intervention group and 262 to control group. There were no differences between the groups for exclusive breastfeeding, odds ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.66–1.38, nor for maternal satisfaction with breastfeeding, attachment or quality of life. The intervention group reported significantly less parental stress than the controls, t = 2.44, 95% CI 0.03–0.23, effect size d = 0.26. Conclusion: In this trial, proactive telephone support was not associated with increased exclusive breastfeeding prevalence eight weeks following discharge. However, intervention group mothers showed significantly lower parental stress.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/apa.14257

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.008 · DOI
  2. 10.1111/mcn.12108 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.clp.2016.11.004 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/jp.2015.168 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012900 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/eurpub/ckm019 · DOI
  8. Renfrew MJ, 2012, Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 5, CD001141
  9. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00446.x · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.midw.2016.09.010 · DOI
  11. 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000652 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1136/bmj.c332 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1177/089033449401000217 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1111/1467-9450.00028 · DOI
  16. Abidin RR, 1995, Parenting Stress Index: professional manual
  17. 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00125-Q · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2011.01226.x · DOI
  19. 10.1186/1471-2431-13-73 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/1471-0528.12884 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.09.006 · DOI
  22. 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000232 · DOI
  23. 10.1186/s13006-017-0142-9 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01423.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ericson, J., Eriksson, M., Hellström‐Westas, L., Hoddinott, P., & Flacking, R.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Örebro University (SE)
  • Department of Women's and Children's Health Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden
  • University of Stirling (GB)
  • Dalarna University (SE)
Corresponding author
Ericson, Jenny
Venue
Acta Paediatrica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-02-22
Volume
107
Issue
5
Pages
791-798
ISSN
  • 0365-1436 (ISSN-L)
  • 0803-5253
  • 1651-2227
OpenAlex
W2787770879
Cited by
44
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Paediatrica (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Diva portal (Dalarna University Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Centrum fÖr Klinisk Forskning Dalarna
  • Gillbergska stiftelsen
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
Keywords
breastfeeding support, preterm infants, telephone support, neonatal intensive care unit discharge, exclusive breastfeeding, parental stress, maternal satisfaction, maternal attachment, quality of life
MeSH terms
Psychosocial Support Systems, Adult, Breast Feeding, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Male, Telephone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review