Cited by 124Physical Activity and HealthSchool Health and Nursing EducationChildren's Physical and Motor Development

Effects of different types of classroom physical activity breaks on children’s on‐task behaviour, academic achievement and cognition

Mavilidi, Myrto F., Drew, Ryan, Morgan, Philip J., Lubans, David R., Schmidt, Mirko, Riley, Nicholas·2020·Acta Paediatrica

Abstract

Aim This study examined the effects of different types of classroom physical activity breaks on children's on-task behaviour, academic achievement and cognition. Methods Participants were 87 Australian primary school students (mean age 9.11 ± 0.62 years), recruited from one school. Three classes were randomly assigned either to activity breaks only (n = 29), activity breaks and mathematics combined (n = 29), or control conditions involving only mathematical content (n = 29). Students were engaged in five minutes of classroom physical activity breaks, three times per week, for four weeks (divided into two minutes at the beginning of the usual mathematics curriculum lesson and three minutes in the middle of the lesson). Assessments were conducted at baseline and post-test. Results Significant group-by-time effects were found for on-task behaviour (active engagement: activity breaks and mathematics combined versus control, p ≤ 0.001; activity breaks versus control, p ≤ 0.001; activity breaks and mathematics combined versus activity breaks, p = 0.037; passive engagement: activity breaks and mathematics combined versus control, p ≤ 0.001) and mathematics scores (activity breaks versus control, p = 0.045). Conclusion Physical activity breaks with and without integrated mathematics content were effective in improving children's on-task behaviour and learning scores.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/apa.14892

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the eight studies that analysed effects on academic performance, four used grades in academic subjects, three used standardised test results, one measured mastery of the basic facts test, and one analysed mathematics and reading performance with the speed test arithmetic and the 1 min test.

    “Of the eight studies that analysed the effects on academic performance, four used grades in academic subjects [40,48,49,50]; meanwhile, three studies utilised standardised test results [43,49,55], one took measurements of the student’s mastery of the basic facts test [47], and one analysed mathematics and reading performance with the speed test arithmetic and the 1 min test [45].”
  • Mavilidi et al. [47] reported a significant (p = 0.045), positive relationship between active breaks and academic performance.

    “Mavilidi et al. [47] reported a significant (p = 0.045), positive relationship between active breaks and academic performance”
  • Mavilidi et al. [47] reported an insignificant (p > 0.05) relationship between cognitively engaging, active breaks and PA.

    “but reported an insignificant (p > 0.05) relationship between cognitively engaging, active breaks and PA”
  • Mavilidi et al. [47] reported active breaks had no significant (p > 0.5) effect on executive functioning compared to the control condition.

    “Mavilidi et al. [47] reported that active breaks had no significant (p > 0.5) effect on executive functioning compared to the control condition”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mavilidi, M. F., Drew, R., Morgan, P. J., Lubans, D. R., Schmidt, M., & Riley, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • University of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
Mavilidi, Myrto F.
Venue
Acta Paediatrica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-07-15
Volume
109
Issue
1
Pages
158-165
ISSN
  • 0365-1436 (ISSN-L)
  • 0803-5253
  • 1651-2227
OpenAlex
W2962594047
Cited by
124
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3
FWCI
10.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Paediatrica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
Keywords
on-task behavior, academic performance, mathematics achievement, cognitive function, elementary school students, active engagement, passive engagement, recess
MeSH terms
Academic Success, Attention, Child, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Mathematics, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review