Cited by 149

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

THE RELEVANCE OF THE COOPERATIVE MODEL IN THE FIELD OF RENEWABLE ENERGY

HUYBRECHTS, Benjamin, MERTENS, Sybille·2014·Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics

Abstract

While ‘traditional’ cooperatives operating for a long time in fields such as banking, agriculture, or retail, have received important attention in the cooperative literature, much work still needs to be done to understand why and how cooperatives emerge either in fields in which they have not traditionally been widespread (such as health and care, services, etc.), or in ‘new’ fields or sub‐fields (such as fair trade, microfinance or renewable energy). Research is even more needed insofar as ‘new’ cooperatives tend to differ from traditional ones in several ways, for instance through the involvement of multiple stakeholders (rather than a dominant one such as producers, consumers or workers) or through a stronger orientation towards general interest goals (beyond traditional mutual interest at the basis of most cooperatives). In this article, we analyze the emergence of cooperatives in the field of renewable energy. This emergence has raised a lot of enthusiasm among the supporters of cooperatives and citizen‐based renewable energy as well as questions regarding the viability and the replicability of this model. On the one hand, the assets of the cooperative model enable us to understand why this form has been adopted by citizen groups and has developed, although to varying extents, in many countries. On the other hand, the limits or weaknesses of the model enable us to explain why cooperatives are still a minority in the field of renewable energy and why their development is constrained by several obstacles.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/apce.12038

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.062 · DOI
  2. 10.5465/amj.2010.57318391 · DOI
  3. BILLIS D., 2010, Hybrid Organizations and the Third Sector. Challenges for Practice, Theory and Policy
  4. BIRCHALL J., 1997, The International Cooperative Movement
  5. BIRCHALL J., 2013, The potential of co‐operatives during the current recession: theorizing comparative advantage, Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity, 2, 1
  6. 10.1016/j.rser.2004.04.002 · DOI
  7. 10.4324/9780203164679 · DOI
  8. BORZAGA C., 2004, Trends and challenges for Co‐operatives and Social Enterprises in developed and transition countries
  9. CHESNICK D., 1997, Leveraging the future: higher debt levels among large coops may be cause of concern, Rural Cooperatives, 6, 11
  10. COASE R., 1998, The new institutional economics, American Economic Review, 88, 72
  11. COOK M., 2000, Institutions, Contracts, and Organizations, 335
  12. 10.7202/1022249ar · DOI
  13. 10.1002/nml.43 · DOI
  14. 10.4135/9781849200387.n2 · DOI
  15. DEFOURNY J., 2000, Social Economy North and South
  16. Demsetz H., 1982, Barriers to Entry, The American Economic Review, 72, 47
  17. 10.1016/S0960-1481(03)00080-6 · DOI
  18. GALERA G., 2004, Trends and challenges for Co‐operatives and Social Enterprises in developed and transition countries
  19. GIJSELINCKX C., 2007, Renouveau coopératif et développement durable
  20. 10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.015 · DOI
  21. HANSMANN H., 1996, The Ownership of Enterprise
  22. HANSMANN H., 1999, Cooperative Firms in Theory and Practice, Finnish Journal of Business Economics, 4, 387
  23. 10.1093/cdj/36.2.96 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/j.1467-8292.2007.00332.x · DOI
  25. HUYBRECHTS B., 2012, Fair Trade Organizations and Social Enterprise. Social Innovation through Hybrid Organization Models, 10.4324/9780203121917 · DOI
  26. 10.1080/09640560701261679 · DOI
  27. LEVI Y., 2001, Internal and external principles. Inward versus Outward Orientation in Co‐operatives, Review of International Cooperation, 94, 50
  28. LEVIY. 2005 ‘How nonprofit and economy can co‐exist: a cooperative perspective’ ICA XXI International Cooperative Research Conference. Cork.
  29. LIPP J., 2012, Renewable Energy Co‐op Scan and Regulatory Review
  30. 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.010 · DOI
  31. 10.1257/0002828041302235 · DOI
  32. MERTENS S., 2005, Une explication théorique à l'existence des coopératives agréées et des sociétés à finalité sociale en Belgique, Non Marchand, 2005, 13
  33. 10.1016/S0973-0826(08)60108-8 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1471-0374.2005.00107.x · DOI
  35. MÜNKNER H.‐H., 2004, Trends and Challenges for Co‐operatives and Social Enterprises in Developed and Transition Countries
  36. 10.1017/CBO9780511807763 · DOI · Paper page
  37. REED D., 2009, Co‐operatives in a Global Economy: The Challenges of Co‐operation Across Borders
  38. REScoop.eu., 2011, Fostering citizen involvement to reach the EU 20–20 goals
  39. 10.1177/000312240807300406 · DOI
  40. SCHREUER A., 2012, Country Cases Austria and Germany
  41. SCHREUER A., 2010, Energy Cooperatives and Local Ownership in the Field of Renewable Energy Technologies: A Literature Review
  42. SEYFANG G., 2012, 3S Working Paper
  43. 10.2189/asqu.2009.54.1.123 · DOI
  44. 10.1111/1467-8292.00151 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.rser.2006.10.021 · DOI
  46. 10.1108/17508610810922686 · DOI
  47. VIENNEY C., 1997, Desjardins : une entreprise et un mouvement
  48. 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.019 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.055 · DOI
  50. 10.1162/glep.2007.7.2.64 · DOI
  51. WEISMEIER‐SAMMER D., 2011, RICC Working Paper
  52. 10.1257/jel.38.3.595 · DOI
  53. WILLIS R., 2012, A guide to this Growing Sector

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 149

Metadata

Authors
HUYBRECHTS, B., & MERTENS, S.
Affiliations
Centre for Social Economy HEC Management School University of Liège Belgium
Venue
Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-05-09
Volume
85
Issue
2
Pages
193-212
ISSN
  • 1370-4788
  • 1467-8292
Cited by
149
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review