Cited by 11Nursing care and researchCancer survivorship and careFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

Post-intervention sustainability of a brief psycho-educational support group intervention for family caregivers of cancer patients

Tan, Joyce Y. S., Lam, Kevin F. Y., Lim, Haikel A., Chua, Shi Min, Kua, Ee Heok, Griva, Konstadina, Mahendran, Rathi·2018·Asia-Pacific Psychiatry

Abstract

Introduction Family caregivers of cancer patients experience many negative effects due to the heavy responsibility involved. Although various psychosocial interventions have been found to improve caregivers' quality of life (QOL), the sustainability of the benefits of these interventions over time has been less consistently investigated and hence less clearly established. Extending previous research on the immediate post-intervention effects, this study aims to examine the trajectories of change in caregivers QOL over an 8-week follow-up period. Methods Caregivers of patients attending an outpatient clinic at a cancer center in Singapore were recruited. Participants had to fulfill the following criteria: (a) between 21 and 74 years; (b) willing to attend hour-long weekly programs for 4 weeks; (c) able to understand, speak, and read English; (d) a family member living with and providing care and support for the patient; and (e) provide written informed consent. Participants completed the Caregiver QOL-Cancer scale at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at 4 and 8 weeks after the end of the intervention. Data from 56 participants were analyzed. Results Majority of participants exhibited a stable trajectory of change in their QOL, while a small number of participants either improved or declined. Discussion Understanding the sustainability of the effects of the intervention is important in determining the need to initiate periodic "booster" sessions to provide consistent…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/appy.12305

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tan, J. Y. S., Lam, K. F. Y., Lim, H. A., Chua, S. M., Kua, E. H., Griva, K., & Mahendran, R.
Affiliations
National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Mahendran, Rathi
Venue
Asia-Pacific Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-12-11
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
e12305-e12305
ISSN
  • 1758-5864 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5872
OpenAlex
W2774321422
Cited by
11
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Asia-Pacific Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National University Cancer Institute, Singapore (Centre Grant FY 2013‐2016)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
family caregivers, cancer patients, caregiver quality of life, intervention sustainability, long-term follow-up, change trajectories, booster sessions, caregiver burden
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Family, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Psychotherapy, Quality of Life, Self-Help Groups, Social Support, Caregivers, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review