Support based on psychoeducation intervention to address quality of life and care burden among caregivers of patients with cancer: a randomized controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Cancer affects not only patients but also their family caregivers, causing increased caregiving burden and reduced quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a psychoeducation intervention on improving the quality of life and reducing caregiving burden among caregivers of cancer patients. Methods: This study employed a non-blinded randomized controlled trial design involving 66 family caregivers of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in Shahroud, Iran in 2024. Of the 69 caregivers initially approached, one declined to participate, and two were excluded due to lack of smartphone access, leaving a final sample of 66 caregivers. Participants were assigned to either the psychoeducation intervention program or the control group using the quadruple block randomization method. The intervention spanned 3 months and consisted of six online group sessions lasting 35–45 min each. The psychoeducation intervention was delivered by trained psychiatric nurse. Data were collected before and 1 month after the intervention using the SF-36 quality of life questionnaire and the Novak and Guest care burden inventory. Statistical analysis was conducted using chi squared, independent t-tests, and the linear regression analysis with a significance level set at 0.05. Results: The primary outcome of this study was the change in caregivers’ quality of life and caregiver burden. Initially, both groups exhibited similar average scores for care burden and quality of life (p > 0.05). The intervention group showed a significant reduction in caregiving burden by 4.1 ± 13.7, whereas the control group experienced a slight increase of 2.5 ± 12.0. Similarly, quality of life scores improved by 4.7 ± 16.9 in the intervention group but declined by 8.6 ± 15.3 in the control group. Regression analysis indicated that the psychoeducation group demonstrated significantly lower caregiving burden scores and higher quality of life scores following the intervention compared to the control group. Conclusion: Caregivers of cancer patients often face significant burdens that impact their quality of life. Psychoeducational interventions focusing on coping, problem-solving, and stress management should be integrated into cancer care plans to provide essential support. Clinical trial registration: https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/54613, identifier IRCT20180728040617N3.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This non-blinded randomized controlled trial tested a 3-month online psychoeducation intervention for family caregivers of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in Shahroud, Iran. It found that the intervention group had reduced caregiving burden and improved quality of life compared with the control group one month after the intervention.
Key findings
- Caregiving burden decreased in the intervention group by −4.1 ± 13.7, while the control group increased by 2.5 ± 12.0; the between-group difference in mean change was significant (p = 0.044).
- Quality of life increased in the intervention group by 4.7 ± 16.9, while the control group declined by −8.6 ± 15.3; the between-group difference in mean change was significant (p = 0.001).
- Post-intervention, the psychoeducation group had significantly higher overall quality of life scores than the control group (p = 0.002) and significantly lower caregiving burden scores (p = 0.013).
- Regression analysis showed the control group had lower quality of life (β = −11.068, p < 0.001) and higher caregiving burden (β = 6.456, p = 0.005) than the psychoeducation group, but the time × group interaction was not significant for either outcome (p = 0.150 and p = 0.271).
Methods
- Non-blinded randomized controlled trial with 66 family caregivers of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in Shahroud, Iran in 2024; participants were assigned 1:1 using quadruple block randomization, with 33 in each group.
- The intervention was delivered by a trained psychiatric nurse over 3 months via six online group sessions on WhatsApp, each lasting 35–45 min, based on Lazarus and Folkman’s Stress, Appraisal, and Coping model; the control group received routine care.
- Data were collected before and 1 month after the intervention using the SF-36 quality of life questionnaire and the Novak and Guest Caregiver Burden Inventory; analyses used chi-square, independent t-tests, and linear regression with significance at 0.05.
Limitations
- The authors state that findings may not extrapolate well to other cultures because the study was conducted in Iranian society with distinct religious and social beliefs; they also note possible response bias from questionnaire-based data, measurement error because tools were not cancer-specific, no multiple or long-term follow-up, inability to measure disease severity due to insufficient medical-record information, and selection bias from convenience sampling.
- The text makes evident that the sample was small (66 caregivers), follow-up was short (1 month), and the intervention required smartphone/Internet access, which excluded two caregivers and may limit generalizability.
- Blinding of participants was not possible due to the intervention’s nature, although the data collector and statistical consultant were blinded.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
18 of 31 cited sources checked · 8 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Emotion-based coping has been associated with post-traumatic growth among caregivers of cancer patients.
“whereas emotion-based coping has been associated with post-traumatic growth among caregivers of cancer patients (Akpan-Idiok et al., 2020; Teixeira et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Akpan-Idiok et al., 2020 source
The Results (Table 2; page not provided) describe emotion-focused coping among cancer caregivers and include positive changes such as becoming stronger and more able to face future challenges. The paper does not identify these changes as post-traumatic growth or report an association between emotion-focused coping and that outcome. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Teixeira et al., 2018 source
- Premisecitation
Previous studies have established a significant correlation between levels of caregiving burden and coping strategies.
“Previous studies have established a significant correlation between levels of caregiving burden and coping strategies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Akpan-Idiok et al., 2020 source
- cites Teixeira et al., 2018 source
The Results section, under “Coping and psychophysiological correlates of burden” (page unavailable), reports that problem-focused coping has been associated with decreased caregiver burden. This supports a relationship between a coping strategy and burden, but the passage does not establish a statistically significant correlation between burden levels and coping strategies generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
By engaging in direct communication with fellow caregivers who share similar circumstances, individuals gain a deeper understanding of the emotions, experiences, and challenges associated with caregiving.
“By engaging in direct communication with fellow caregivers who share similar circumstances, individuals gain a deeper understanding of the emotions, experiences, and challenges associated with caregiving (Bilenchi et al., 2022; Khouban-Shargh et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Bilenchi et al., 2022 source
The Discussion (page unavailable) says sharing with people in the same situation was a frequent topic and a positive aspect of the groups. “Sharing as an opportunity” (page unavailable) reports that participants understood they were not alone. The paper supports peer sharing, but does not establish that direct communication gave caregivers a deeper understanding of caregiving emotions, experiences, and challenges. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Khouban-Shargh et al., 2024 source
The Methods > Intervention section (page unavailable) describes group discussions in which caregivers shared experiences and challenges. The Discussion says this sharing enhanced their ability to care for patients, but does not say that direct communication gave them a deeper understanding of caregiving emotions, experiences, and challenges. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Improved quality of life is often associated with a reduction in caregiving burden.
“Improved quality of life is often associated with a reduction in caregiving burden (Akter et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Akter et al., 2023 source
- Premisecitation
Changes in caregiving burden play a significant role in predicting caregivers' quality of life within the realm of cancer care.
“changes in caregiving burden play a significant role in predicting caregivers’ quality of life within the realm of cancer care.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Akter et al., 2023 source
- Findingown data
The time × group interaction effect was not significant for quality of life (β = −0.224, p = 0.150).
“| | Time × group | | −0.224 | 0.154 | −1.457 | 0.150 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The mean change in overall quality of life from pre- to post-intervention was significantly greater in the intervention group than in the control group (4.7 ± 16.9 vs −8.6 ± 15.3, p = 0.001).
“| | Mean differences | −8.6 ± 15.3 | 4.7 ± 16.9 | 0.001 |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Post-intervention, the psychoeducation group demonstrated significantly higher mean scores in emotional well-being (p = 0.001) compared to the control group.
“However, post-intervention, the psychoeducation group demonstrated significantly higher mean scores in several SF-36 domains, including role limitations due to emotional problems (p = 0.011), energy/fatigue (p = 0.002), emotional well-being (p = 0.001), social functioning (p = 0.021), and pain (p = 0.015) compared to the control group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In linear regression, the control group had significantly lower quality of life scores than the psychoeducation group post-intervention (β = −11.068, p < 0.001).
“| Quality of life | | Control | −11.068 | 2.739 | −4.041 | <0.001 |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Post-intervention, the psychoeducation group demonstrated significantly higher mean scores in energy/fatigue (p = 0.002) compared to the control group.
“However, post-intervention, the psychoeducation group demonstrated significantly higher mean scores in several SF-36 domains, including role limitations due to emotional problems (p = 0.011), energy/fatigue (p = 0.002), emotional well-being (p = 0.001), social functioning (p = 0.021), and pain (p = 0.015) compared to the control group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Following the psychoeducation intervention, there was a significant decrease in caregiving burden scores.
“Based on the results of the current study, it was observed that following the implementation of psychoeducation intervention, there was a significant decrease in caregiving burden scores.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Overall, the psychoeducation group had significantly higher quality of life scores than the control group (p = 0.001).
“Overall, the psychoeducation group had significantly higher quality of life scores than the control group (p = 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The time × group interaction effect was not significant for caregiving burden (β = −0.174, p = 0.271).
“| | Time × group | | −0.174 | 0.157 | −1.110 | 0.271 |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Post-intervention, the psychoeducation group demonstrated significantly higher mean scores in role limitations due to emotional problems (p = 0.011) compared to the control group.
“However, post-intervention, the psychoeducation group demonstrated significantly higher mean scores in several SF-36 domains, including role limitations due to emotional problems (p = 0.011), energy/fatigue (p = 0.002), emotional well-being (p = 0.001), social functioning (p = 0.021), and pain (p = 0.015) compared to the control group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Post-intervention, the psychoeducation group demonstrated significantly higher mean scores in pain (p = 0.015) compared to the control group.
“However, post-intervention, the psychoeducation group demonstrated significantly higher mean scores in several SF-36 domains, including role limitations due to emotional problems (p = 0.011), energy/fatigue (p = 0.002), emotional well-being (p = 0.001), social functioning (p = 0.021), and pain (p = 0.015) compared to the control group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Post-intervention, the psychoeducation group demonstrated significantly higher mean scores in social functioning (p = 0.021) compared to the control group.
“However, post-intervention, the psychoeducation group demonstrated significantly higher mean scores in several SF-36 domains, including role limitations due to emotional problems (p = 0.011), energy/fatigue (p = 0.002), emotional well-being (p = 0.001), social functioning (p = 0.021), and pain (p = 0.015) compared to the control group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In linear regression, the control group had significantly higher caregiving burden scores than the psychoeducation group post-intervention (β = 6.456, p = 0.005).
“| Care burden | | Control | 6.456 | 2.210 | 2.922 | 0.005 |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Following the intervention, the mean caregiving burden score in the intervention group was significantly lower than in the control group (p = 0.044).
“However, following the intervention, a significant difference emerged between the groups. Specifically, the mean caregiving burden score in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group (p = 0.044).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
There were no significant baseline differences between intervention and control groups regarding demographic variables among caregivers and patients (p > 0.05).
“Based on this study’s findings, there were no significant baseline differences between the intervention and control groups regarding demographic variables among caregivers and patients, such as caregiver age, gender, caregiving hours, marital status, education, health insurance, employment, underlying health conditions, relationship to the patient, or the need for support associations. Similarly,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
No significant differences were observed in all SF-36 domains and total quality of life scores between groups at baseline (p = 0.445).
“As shown in Table 3, no significant differences were observed in the all SF-36 domains and total quality of life scores between the control and psychoeducation groups at baseline (p = 0.445).”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“Initially, both groups exhibited similar average scores for care burden and quality of life (p > 0.05).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Premisecitation
Psychoeducational interventions enhance quality of life among cancer patients.
“in a study conducted by Chen et al. (2022), results demonstrated the efficacy of psychoeducational interventions in enhancing the quality of life among cancer patients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chen et al., 2022 source
- Study design and conductown data
Prior to the intervention, there was no significant difference between the two groups in mean caregiving burden scores (p = 0.980).
“Results from the independent t-test indicated that prior to the intervention, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mean and standard deviation of caregiving burden scores (p = 0.980).”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“Initially, both groups exhibited similar average scores for care burden and quality of life (p > 0.05).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Study design and conductnone given
The effectiveness of the intervention was not assessed over multiple or long-term periods.
“Additionally, the effectiveness of the intervention was not assessed over multiple or long-term periods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
A brief weekly psychoeducation intervention over 4 weeks notably enhanced the quality of life of caregivers of cancer patients in Singapore.
“a brief weekly psychoeducation intervention over 4 weeks notably enhanced the quality of life of caregivers of cancer patients (Tan et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tan et al., 2018 source
- Premisecitation
A similar study in Turkey showed improvements in quality of life for both patients with incurable cancer and their caregivers.
“results from a similar study conducted in Turkey echoed the current findings, showcasing improvements in quality of life for both patients with incurable cancer and their caregivers (Çalık et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Çalık et al., 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductown data
The study was unable to adequately measure disease severity due to insufficient information on disease stage in patients' medical records.
“we were unable to adequately measure this variable due to insufficient information on disease stage in patients’ medical records.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 21
- May combine two claims. 17
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCaregiving burden is a multidimensional construct encompassing social, emotional, psychological, physical, and economic consequences for the caregiver.
“Caregiving burden is recognized as a multidimensional construct, encompassing social, emotional, psychological, physical, and economic consequences for the caregiver (Vatter et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Vatter et al., 2018 source
The title in our indexed copy identifies care burden in Parkinson’s-related dementia as multidimensional. The available passages do not describe its dimensions or establish the claimed social, emotional, psychological, physical, and economic consequences for caregivers. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAn educational support program tailored for caregivers promotes a triangular relationship among patients, family caregivers, and healthcare providers, enhancing quality of life for both patients and caregivers while mitigating caregiver burden.
“An educational support program tailored for caregivers promotes a triangular relationship among patients, their family caregivers, and healthcare providers, fostering an environment that enhances the quality of life for both patients and caregivers while mitigating caregiver burden (Gabriel et al., 2020; Alfaro-Díaz et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationProblem-based coping has been linked to reduced levels of caregiving burden, depressive symptoms, and better adaptation among caregivers of cancer patients.
“Problem-based coping has been linked to reduced levels of caregiving burden, depressive symptoms, and better adaptation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Akpan-Idiok et al., 2020 source
The Discussion says more effective coping strategies are associated with less caregiving burden, and Table 2 describes adjustment and acceptance under problem-focused coping (page numbers unavailable). The paper does not link problem-focused coping specifically to reduced depressive symptoms; its mentions of depression concern caregiving distress, not the effects of coping. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Teixeira et al., 2018 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe interventions adhered to the TIDieR checklist.
“The above-described interventions adhere to the TIDieR checklist, a tool utilized for organizing details related to behavioral interventions (Hoffmann et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Hoffmann et al., 2014 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCancer affects not only patients but also their family caregivers, causing increased caregiving burden and reduced quality of life.
“Importantly, the burden of cancer is not borne solely by patients but also significantly affects their crucial family members, particularly their caregivers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Turliuc et al., 2021 source
In “This Special Research Topic” (page unavailable), the editorial discusses cancer’s impact on patients’ partners and identifies lay caregivers as important to patients after stem-cell transplant. This supports the broad point that cancer reaches beyond patients, but it does not establish increased caregiving burden or reduced quality of life among family caregivers. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA study by Hemmati Maslakpak et al. (2019) illustrated that psychoeducation intervention, comprising six group discussion sessions and four workshop sessions, significantly reduced the caregiving burden among caregivers of hemodialysis patients.
“a study by Hemmati Maslakpak et al. (2019) illustrated that psychoeducation intervention, comprising six group discussion sessions and four workshop sessions, significantly reduced the caregiving burden among caregivers of hemodialysis patients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Hemmati Maslakpak et al. (2019) source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPsychoeducational interventions yield improvements in psychological well-being and coping outcomes among family caregivers of children with cancer.
“findings from a meta-analysis study have indicated that psychoeducational interventions yield improvements in psychological well-being and coping outcomes among family caregivers of children with cancer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Tang et al., 2020 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationResearch in other domains, such as bipolar disorder, chronic kidney disease, palliative care, and older adults with mild cognitive impairment, has also yielded similar results.
“Research conducted in other domains, such as bipolar disorder, chronic kidney disease, patients receiving palliative care, and older adults with mild cognitive impairment, has also yielded similar results (Bártolo et al., 2022; Baruch et al., 2018; Çetin and Nehir, 2020; Young et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Bártolo et al., 2022 source
- cites Baruch et al., 2018 source
- cites Çetin and Nehir, 2020 source
The Results report that psychoeducation significantly improved quality of life among caregivers of people receiving palliative care, and the Discussion reports improved coping skills. This supports the claim of similar results in a palliative-care setting, but the study examined caregivers, not the patients receiving palliative care. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataRegression analysis indicated that the psychoeducation group demonstrated significantly lower caregiving burden scores and higher quality of life scores following the intervention compared to the control group.
“Regression analysis indicated that the psychoeducation group demonstrated significantly lower caregiving burden scores and higher quality of life scores following the intervention compared to the control group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe intervention group exhibited a decrease in caregiving burden scores post-intervention (mean change −4.1 ± 13.7), whereas the control group experienced an increase (2.5 ± 12.0).
“Additionally, significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the mean changes in caregiving burden scores. Notably, the intervention group exhibited a decrease in caregiving burden scores post-intervention, whereas the control group experienced an increase (2.5 ± 12.0 compared to −4.1 ± 13.7).”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“The intervention group showed a significant reduction in caregiving burden by 4.1 ± 13.7, whereas the control group experienced a slight increase of 2.5 ± 12.0.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Results · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe intervention group demonstrated an increase in average quality of life scores (4.7 ± 16.9), while the control group showed a decline (−8.6 ± 15.3).
“The intervention group demonstrated an increase in average quality of life scores (4.7 ± 16.9), while the control group showed a decline (−8.6 ± 15.3), highlighting a substantial difference between the groups.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“Similarly, quality of life scores improved by 4.7 ± 16.9 in the intervention group but declined by 8.6 ± 15.3 in the control group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Results · plain
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHigh levels of caregiving burden are associated with low levels of resilience among caregivers, placing them at greater risk for anxiety and depression.
“High levels of caregiving burden are often associated with low levels of resilience among caregivers, placing them at greater risk for anxiety and depression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe Persian version of the SF-36 questionnaire exhibits an acceptable minimum reliability coefficient.
“Previous research has demonstrated that the Persian version of the SF-36 questionnaire exhibits an acceptable minimum reliability coefficient (Montazeri et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Montazeri et al., 2005 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrevious research has highlighted the beneficial impact of psychoeducational interventions on quality of life, caregiving burden, and the reduction of anxiety and depression symptoms in caregivers of cancer patients.
“previous research has highlighted the beneficial impact of psychoeducational interventions on quality of life, caregiving burden, and the reduction of anxiety and depression symptoms in caregivers of cancer patients (Kusi et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kusi et al., 2023 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn the present study, the Novak and Guest inventory had a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.81.
“In the present study, the reliability of this inventory was assessed as acceptable, with an internal consistency measured by Cronbach’s alpha coefficient calculated at 0.81.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe data collector and statistical consultant maintained blinding throughout the study.
“In this study, while blinding the participants was not possible given the nature of the intervention, the data collector and statistical consultant maintained blinding throughout the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA systematic review and meta-analysis by Cheng et al. (2022) demonstrated the efficacy of psychoeducational interventions in alleviating symptoms of anxiety, depression, and caregiving burden, while enhancing self-efficacy and quality of life among caregivers of cancer patients.
“a systematic review and meta-analysis conducted by Cheng et al. (2022), which demonstrated the efficacy of psychoeducational interventions in alleviating symptoms of anxiety, depression, and caregiving burden, while enhancing self-efficacy and quality of life among caregivers of cancer patients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cheng et al. (2022) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataA power analysis for care burden and quality of life revealed a power of 1.0 for both.
“Using STATA software, a power analysis was conducted for the main variables, care burden and quality of life, revealing a power of 1.0 for both.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataGastrointestinal and breast cancers were the most common cancer types, with similar distributions across both groups (p = 0.520).
“Gastrointestinal and breast cancers were the most common cancer types, with similar distributions across both groups (p = 0.520).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenBoth written and verbal informed consent were obtained from all participants.
“Both written and verbal informed consent were obtained from all participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe response rate in this study was 97.1%.
“The response rate in this study was 97.1%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and received ethics approval from Shahroud University of Medical Sciences (IR.SHMU.REC.1399.158).
“The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and received approval from the Ethics Council of Shahroud University of Medical Sciences (ethics code: IR.SHMU.REC.1399.158).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe Novak and Guest Caregiver Burden Inventory demonstrates good reliability, with reported Cronbach's alpha coefficients for subscales ranging from 0.69 to 0.87 and overall 0.80.
“The inventory demonstrates good reliability, with reported Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for the subscales ranging from 0.69 to 0.87, and an overall Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.80 (Novak and Guest, 1989).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Novak and Guest, 1989 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductown dataIn the current study, the SF-36 had a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.79.
“In the current study, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was calculated as 0.79 to assess internal consistency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataImplementing psychoeducation intervention, which focuses on enhancing caregivers' coping skills, problem-solving abilities, and stress management techniques, may likely enhance quality of life and alleviate caregiving burden.
“The findings of this research indicate that implementing psychoeducation intervention, which focuses on enhancing caregivers’ coping skills, problem-solving abilities, and stress management techniques, may likely enhance quality of life and alleviate caregiving burden.”
- Also stated in: § Implications for practice · boosted
“These programs have been shown to significantly reduce caregiving burden and enhance quality of life by fostering coping skills, stress management, and problem-solving abilities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Implications for practice · boosted
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataTwo caregivers were excluded from the study due to a lack of smartphone access.
“Two caregivers were excluded from the study due to a lack of smartphone access (Figure 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenAllocation in the study was based on random allocation using quadruple block allocation with a 1:1 ratio generated by SPSS software.
“Allocation in this study was based on random allocation using quadruple block allocation with a ratio of one to one generated by SPSS software.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningData collection for this research relied on questionnaires and scales, posing a threat to external validity due to potential response bias.
“Furthermore, data collection for this research relied on questionnaires and scales, thereby posing a threat to the external validity of the results due to potential response bias.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe convenience sampling method can introduce selection bias into the study results.
“However, it is important to note that this approach can introduce selection bias into the study results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe study is novel in integrating Lazarus and Folkman's Stress, Appraisal, and Coping model into the cancer domain and assessing its effects on various caregiving aspects, particularly caregiving burden and quality of life among family caregivers.
“it’s essential to underscore the novelty of this study in integrating Lazarus and Folkman’s Stress, Appraisal, and Coping model into the cancer domain and assessing its effects on various caregiving aspects, particularly caregiving burden and quality of life among family caregivers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that online health interventions, such as online psychoeducation, are effective in supporting informal caregivers of cancer patients, leading to a reduction in depressive symptoms and an improvement in their quality of life.
“a systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that online health interventions, such as online psychoeducation, are effective in supporting informal caregivers of cancer patients, leading to a reduction in depressive symptoms and an improvement in their quality of life (Li et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li et al., 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe data collection tools were not specifically tailored for the cancer context, making the results susceptible to measurement error.
“Moreover, since the data collection tools were not specifically tailored for the cancer context, the results are susceptible to measurement error.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe collective outcomes of previous research consistently underscore the beneficial effectiveness of such interventions in mitigating negative outcomes and fostering positive ones in caregiving.
“Nevertheless, their collective outcomes consistently underscore the beneficial effectiveness of such interventions in mitigating negative outcomes and fostering positive ones in caregiving.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationA psychoeducation intervention comprising six weekly 90-min sessions was effective in enhancing the quality of life of caregivers of breast cancer patients.
“Gabriel et al. demonstrated the effectiveness of a psychoeducation intervention comprising six weekly 90-min sessions in enhancing the quality of life of caregivers of breast cancer patients”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gabriel and Mayers, 2019 source
The paper relies on this without support.
There is a need for further research on psychoeducational support interventions for caregivers of cancer patients.
“Acknowledging the necessity for further research in this domain, this study was conducted with the objective of assessing the efficacy of psychoeducational support interventions on the quality of life and caregiver burden experienced by caregivers of cancer patients.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Enhancing the quality of life and alleviating caregiver burden among family caregivers of cancer patients plays a pivotal role in the patient’s recovery journey.
“It’s crucial to recognize that enhancing the quality of life and alleviating caregiver burden among family caregivers of cancer patients plays a pivotal role in the patient’s recovery journey.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The effects of the psychoeducation intervention observed in this single-center study in Shahroud, Iran, are generalizable to other cancer care settings.
“Psychoeducational interventions focusing on coping, problem-solving, and stress management should be integrated into cancer care plans to provide essential support.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The control group's routine interventions did not include psychoeducational components.
“Moreover, participants in the control group received routine interventions provided by medical centers.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Family caregivers of cancer patients frequently encounter a decline in their quality of life and substantial caregiving burdens.
“Family caregivers of cancer patients frequently encounter a decline in their quality of life and grapple with substantial caregiving burdens.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Psychoeducational support is cost-efficient.
“Implementing psychoeducational support aimed at enhancing coping skills, problem-solving abilities, and stress management in caregivers is recommended as an effective, practical, and cost-efficient intervention to alleviate caregiving burdens and enhance their quality of life.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Post-intervention care-burden p-value differs from Table 2
MinorThe results text gives p = 0.044 for the post-intervention comparison, while Table 2 gives p = 0.013. The text's value is instead the table's p-value for the comparison of mean changes.
“the mean caregiving burden score in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group (p = 0.044).”
“| Care burden | Post-intervention | 60.1 ± 11.1 | 53.6 ± 9.2 | 0.013 |”
Physical-functioning change does not match the intervention-group scores
MinorThe intervention group's physical-functioning score rose from 81.1 to 85.0, a change of 3.9 rather than the reported 3.0.
Reported 3 · recomputed 3.9
“| Physical functioning | Mean differences | −7.9 ± 24.9 | 3.0 ± 24.1 | 0.076 |”
Post-intervention energy/fatigue p-value differs from Table 3
MinorThe text assigns p = 0.002 to the post-intervention comparison, but Table 3 reports 0.011 for that comparison and 0.002 for mean differences.
“energy/fatigue (p = 0.002)”
“| Energy/fatigue | Post-intervention | 50.2 ± 11.6 | 57.1 ± 10.1 | 0.011 |”
Post-intervention social-functioning p-value differs from Table 3
MinorThe text reports p = 0.021 for the post-intervention comparison, but Table 3 reports 0.031. The 0.021 value belongs to the mean-differences row.
“social functioning (p = 0.021)”
“| | Post-intervention | 60.2 ± 12.3 | 67.0 ± 12.8 | 0.031 |”
Cites
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 33,716 · see citing works
Eysenck, H. J. (1985) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(85)90087-7 · Cited by 32,026 · see citing works
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · Cited by 30,033 · see citing works
Hoffmann, T. C., Glasziou, P. P., Boutron, I., Milne, R., Perera, R., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Barbour, V., Macdonald, H., Johnston, M., et al. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g1687 · Cited by 10,548 · see citing works
Caregiver Burden: A Clinical Review
Adelman, R. D., Tmanova, L. L., Delgado, D., Dion, S., & Lachs, M. S. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2014.304 · Cited by 2,002 · see citing works
Application of a multidimensional caregiver burden inventory
Novak, M., & Guest, C. (1989) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/29.6.798 · Cited by 1,205 · see citing works
How Effective Are Interventions With Caregivers? An Updated Meta-Analysis
Sörensen, S., Pinquart, M., & Duberstein, P. R. (2002) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/42.3.356 · Cited by 1,129 · cited 1× · see citing works
“By imparting knowledge and skills, psychoeducational interventions aim to enhance family caregivers’ understanding of the patient’s illness, bolster their stress-coping abilities, and improve psychological well-being for both caregivers and patients (Barsevick et al., 2002; Sörensen et al., 2002).”
The short form health survey (SF-36): translation and validation study of the Iranian version
Montazeri, A., Goshtasebi, A., Vahdaninia, M., & Gandek, B. (2005) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-004-1014-5 · Cited by 1,125 · see citing works
Cancer as a "we-disease": Examining the process of coping from a relational perspective.
Kayser, K., Watson, L. E., & Andrade, J. T. (2007) · Families Systems & Health · doi:10.1037/1091-7527.25.4.404 · Cited by 522 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Kayser et al. (2007) also introduced the term “We-disease,” highlighting that the burden of care should be considered for both the cancer patient and their family members (Kayser et al., 2007).”
Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis
Falconier, M. K., Jackson, J. B., Hilpert, P., & Bodenmann, G. (2015) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.07.002 · Cited by 473 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Dyadic coping is a systemic framework that describes how caregivers manage stressors, encompassing stress communication, individual strategies to support the other caregiver, and joint strategies to cope collaboratively (Falconier et al., 2015).”
Barsevick, A. M., Sweeney, C., Haney, E., & Chung, E. (2002) · Oncology nursing forum · doi:10.1188/02.onf.73-87 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Ochoa, C. Y., Buchanan Lunsford, N., & Lee Smith, J. (2020) · Palliative and Supportive Care · doi:10.1017/s1478951519000622 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Health-related quality of life in Asian patients with breast cancer: a systematic review
Ho, P. J., Gernaat, S. A. M., Hartman, M., & Verkooijen, H. M. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020512 · Cited by 161 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This approach prioritizes resource allocation, comprehensive care planning, and delivery that emphasizes quality of life and other subjective factors influencing care (Ho et al., 2018).”
Caserta, M. S., Lund, D. A., & Wright, S. D. (1996) · The International Journal of Aging and Human Development · doi:10.2190/2dkf-292p-a53w-w0a8 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Li, Y., Li, J., Zhang, Y., Ding, Y., & Hu, X. (2022) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104179 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
The Problems and Needs of Patients Diagnosed with Cancer and Their Caregivers
Lewandowska, A., Rudzki, G., Lewandowski, T., & Rudzki, S. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18010087 · Cited by 118 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Patients with cancer, who are dealing with a chronic illness, are constantly exposed to various acute financial and non-financial distress (Lewandowska et al., 2021; Goyanka, 2021).”
Frías, C. E., Pascual, M. G., Montoro-Lorite, M., Ribas, N., Risco, E., & Zabalegui, A. (2019) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.14286 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Quality of life, caregiver burden, and resilience among the family caregivers of cancer survivors
Üzar-Özçeti̇n, Y. S., & Dursun, S. İ. (2020) · European Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101832 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Teixeira, R. J., Applebaum, A. J., Bhatia, S., & Brandão, T. (2018) · Psychology Research and Behavior Management · doi:10.2147/prbm.s164946 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Gabriel, I., Creedy, D., & Coyne, E. (2020) · Nursing Open · doi:10.1002/nop2.543 · Cited by 103 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…for caregivers promotes a triangular relationship among patients, their family caregivers, and healthcare providers, fostering an environment that enhances the quality of life for both patients and caregivers while mitigating caregiver burden (Gabriel et al., 2020; Alfaro-Díaz et al., 2022).”
Family Caregivers’ Involvement in Caring with Cancer and their Quality of Life
Kilic, S. T., & Oz, F. (2019) · Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.31557/apjcp.2019.20.6.1735 · Cited by 93 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These caregivers, often overlooked, provide financial, physical, emotional, and social support, assuming numerous responsibilities to meet patients’ needs (Kilic and Oz, 2019).”
Cheng, Q., Xu, B., Ng, M. S. N., Duan, Y., & So, W. K. W. (2022) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104162 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Distress in cancer patients: Who are the main groups at risk?
Herschbach, P., Britzelmeir, I., Dinkel, A., Giesler, J. M., Herkommer, K., Nest, A., Pichler, T., Reichelt, R., Tanzer‐Küntzer, S., Weis, J., et al. (2019) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.5321 · Cited by 81 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The progression of the disease is accompanied by issues such as severe pain, increased fatigue, and psychological and emotional challenges, which can impact various aspects of these patients’ lives (Herschbach et al., 2020).”
Sanjida, S., McPhail, S. M., Shaw, J., Couper, J., Kissane, D., Price, M. A., & Janda, M. (2018) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.4794 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Hastert, T. A., Ruterbusch, J. J., Nair, M., Noor, M. I., Beebe-Dimmer, J. L., Schwartz, K., Baird, T. E., Harper, F. W. K., Thompson, H., & Schwartz, A. G. (2020) · JCO Oncology Practice · doi:10.1200/jop.19.00410 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Multidimensional care burden in Parkinson-related dementia
Vatter, S., McDonald, K. R., Stanmore, E., Clare, L., & Leroi, I. (2018) · Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology · doi:10.1177/0891988718802104 · Cited by 46 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Caregiving burden is recognized as a multidimensional construct, encompassing social, emotional, psychological, physical, and economic consequences for the caregiver (Vatter et al., 2018).”
Baruch, E., Pistrang, N., & Barker, C. (2018) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.077 · Cited by 45 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Research conducted in other domains, such as bipolar disorder, chronic kidney disease, patients receiving palliative care, and older adults with mild cognitive impairment, has also yielded similar results (Bártolo et al., 2022; Baruch et al., 2018; Çetin and Nehir, 2020; Young et al., 2019).”
Tang, W. P., Chan, C. W., Leung, D. Y., & Chan, D. N. (2020) · Journal of Child Health Care · doi:10.1177/1367493518814917 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Soresi, S., Nota, L., & Ferrari, L. (2007) · Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities · doi:10.1111/j.1741-1130.2006.00087.x · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Assessment of burden and coping strategies among caregivers of cancer patients in sub-Saharan Africa
Akpan-Idiok, P. A., Ehiemere, I. O., Asuquo, E. F., Chabo, J. A. U., & Osuchukwu, E. C. (2020) · World Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.5306/wjco.v11.i12.1045 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Gabriel, I. O., & Mayers, P. M. (2019) · European Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2018.12.003 · Cited by 43 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…significant enhancements in quality of life, stress coping skills, and notable reductions in caregiver burden, symptoms of depression, and anxiety have been observed among patients and their family caregivers (Çetin and Nehir, 2020; Çalık et al., 2022; Kusi et al., 2023; Gabriel and Mayers, 2019).”
Factors influencing cancer patients’ caregivers’ burden and quality of life: An integrative review
Akter, J., Konlan, K. D., Nesa, M., & Ispriantari, A. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21243 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Schou Bredal, I., Kåresen, R., Smeby, N. A., Espe, R., Sørensen, E. M., Amundsen, M., Aas, H., & Ekeberg, Ø. (2014) · Cancer Nursing · doi:10.1097/ncc.0b013e31829879a3 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Economic and non-economic burden of cancer
Goyanka, R. (2021) · Cancer Research Statistics and Treatment · doi:10.4103/crst.crst_6_21 · Cited by 39 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Patients with cancer, who are dealing with a chronic illness, are constantly exposed to various acute financial and non-financial distress (Lewandowska et al., 2021; Goyanka, 2021).”
Alfaro-Díaz, C., Svavarsdottir, E. K., Esandi, N., Klinke, M. E., & Canga-Armayor, A. (2022) · Journal of Family Nursing · doi:10.1177/10748407211068816 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Kusi, G., Atenafu, E. G., Boamah Mensah, A. B., Lee, C. T., Viswabandya, A., Puts, M., & Mayo, S. (2023) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.6050 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Biliūnaitė, I., Kazlauskas, E., Sanderman, R., Truskauskaitė‐Kunevičienė, I., Dumarkaitė, A., & Andersson, G. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/21466 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Cassidy, L., Hill, L., Fitzsimons, D., & McGaughey, J. (2021) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103806 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Informal caregivers in home palliative care
Harding, R. (2013) · Progress in Palliative Care · doi:10.1179/1743291x13y.0000000056 · Cited by 29 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These individuals, informal and unpaid, share a personal connection with the patient, undertaking various physical, social, practical, and emotional tasks (Harding, 2013).”
Hoseini, F. F., baniasadi, M., Bordbar, M. R. F., Pourgholami, M., Ahrari, S., & Asgharipour, N. (2017) · PubMed Central · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Effects of physical activity interventions for caregivers of adults: A meta-analysis.
Marshall, E., LaCaille, R. A., LaCaille, L. J., et al. (2022) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0001212 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Phiri, L. S., Li, W. H. C., Cheung, A. T., & Phiri, P. (2023) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.6208 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Vashistha, V., Poulose, R., Choudhari, C., Kaur, S., & Mohan, A. (2019) · Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Care · doi:10.31557/apjcc.2019.4.3.87-93 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Bártolo, A., Sousa, H., Ribeiro, O., & Figueiredo, D. (2022) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2021.2013961 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Okafor, A. J., & Monahan, M. (2023) · Nursing Research and Practice · doi:10.1155/2023/2167096 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Mirhosseini, S., Nezhad, F. S. H., Rahim, A. H. M., Basirinezhad, M. H., Bakhshiarab, A., Saeedi, M., & Ebrahimi, H. (2024) · Health Science Reports · doi:10.1002/hsr2.2155 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationDengsø, K. E., Thomsen, T., Andersen, E. W., Hansen, C. P., Christensen, B. M., Hillingsø, J., & Dalton, S. O. (2021) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-021-06251-4 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Perceived barriers to symptoms management among family caregivers of cancer patients
Nayak, M. G., George, A., & Vidyasagar, M. S. (2018) · Indian Journal of Palliative Care · doi:10.4103/ijpc.ijpc_27_18 · Cited by 18 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…ties with the patient, experiencing low income levels, cohabiting with the patient, lacking sufficient knowledge in managing the patient’s symptoms, and grappling with negative psychological symptoms such as depression and anxiety (Vashistha et al., 2019; Akter et al., 2023; Nayak et al., 2018).”
Hemmati Maslakpak, M., Associate Prof., M. A. C. O. R. C., Torabi, M., Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, U. U. O. M. S., Radfar, M., Department of Psychiatric Nursing, U. U. O. M. S., Alinejad, V., & Patient Safety Research Center, U. U. O. M. S. (2019) · Journal of Research Development in Nursing and Midwifery · doi:10.29252/jgbfnm.16.1.14 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Bilenchi, V. A., Banfi, P., Pagnini, F., & Volpato, E. (2022) · Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s10072-022-05930-2 · Cited by 14 · cited 1× · see citing works
“By engaging in direct communication with fellow caregivers who share similar circumstances, individuals gain a deeper understanding of the emotions, experiences, and challenges associated with caregiving (Bilenchi et al., 2022; Khouban-Shargh et al., 2024).”
Khouban-Shargh, R., Mirhosseini, S., Ghasempour, S., Basirinezhad, M. H., & Abbasi, A. (2024) · BMC Nephrology · doi:10.1186/s12882-024-03795-5 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationTan, J. Y. S., Lam, K. F. Y., Lim, H. A., Chua, S. M., Kua, E. H., Griva, K., & Mahendran, R. (2018) · Asia-Pacific Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/appy.12305 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Douglas, S. L., Plow, M. A., Packer, T. L., Lipson, A. R., & Lehman, M. J. (2021) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/30617 · Cited by 11 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These findings extend beyond cancer caregiving to other chronic diseases such as schizophrenia, dementia, multiple sclerosis, and heart failure, thereby corroborating the results of the current study (Frias et al., 2020; Okafor and Monahan, 2023; Douglas et al., 2021; Cassidy et al., 2021).”
Minaei-Moghadam, S., Manzari, Z. S., Vaghee, S., & Mirhosseini, S. (2024) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-023-17594-4 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationÇalık, K. Y., Küçük, E., & Halimoğlu, B. (2021) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-021-06672-1 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Psychoeducation Group on Improving Quality of Life of Mild Cognitive Impaired Elderly
Young, D. K. W., Petrus Yat-nam, N. G., & Cheng, D. (2017) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/1049731517732420 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Chen, D., Liu, Q., Zhang, L., & Qian, H. (2025) · Cancer Nursing · doi:10.1097/ncc.0000000000001307 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Fumaneeshoat, O., & Ingviya, T. (2020) · Journal of Health Science and Medical Research · doi:10.31584/jhsmr.2020736 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Effects of psychoeducation on palliative caregivers’ quality of life and skills to cope with stress
(2020) · DergiPark (Istanbul University) · doi:10.17826/cumj.649713 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Editorial: Individual versus Dyadic Processes: Health and Relationship Outcomes
Turliuc, M. N., Milek, A., & Trillingsgaard, T. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.714548 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Individual versus Dyadic Processes: Health and Relationship Outcomes
(2021) · Frontiers research topics · doi:10.3389/978-2-88971-377-6 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Phiri, L. S., Li, H. W. C., Phiri, P., Choi, K. C., Wanda‐Kalizang'oma, W., & Nkhandwe, G. (2025) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105205 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Roshid, M. M., Rahman, M. M., Eity, K. F., & Okamura, H. (2026) · Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1093/jjco/hyag026 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Nittas, V., Melkestian, E., Bikou, A., Hellmann, A., Frei, A. L., von Wyl, V., & Puhan, M. A. (2026) · Home Health Care Management & Practice · doi:10.1177/10848223261428104 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Alhalal, E. (2025) · Applied Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2025.152021 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Esteban-Bueno, G., Soto, A. J., Fernández‐Martínez, J. L., Vilas, E. F., & Coca, J. R. (2025) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics15182338 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Psychoeducational programs for caregivers may help mitigate family burden [52], and combined cognitive strategies may further enhance outcomes [53].”
Gaafr, A. M. M., Elewa, S. M. M., Atta, F., et al. (2025) · Jurnal NERS · doi:10.20473/jn.v20i2.64600
Deva, M. B., & Kelmendi, K. (2025) · Adversity and Resilience Science · doi:10.1007/s42844-025-00181-4
“Support from the families and friends also plays a vital role, normalizing the caregiving experience, providing practical advice, and promoting a sense of belonging and shared understanding, all shown to boost caregivers’ feelings of control and reducing isolation (Mirhosseini et al., 2025).”
Chilakamarri, S., Prakash, A., & Natarajan, A. (2025) · Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery · doi:10.1007/s12070-025-06254-1
Ping, S. O. N. G., Yuan, S., Guan, Y., et al. (2026) · International Journal of Nursing Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ijnss.2026.02.004
“These attributes capture the emotional, social, and financial toll of time toxicity, beyond logistical challenges [49].”
Güçlü, Y. A., Tekın, N., & Ceylan, Ş. (2026) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare14081084
“This finding aligns with the thesis in the literature that “caregiver burden” is not only a psychological stressor but also a multidimensional phenomenon that triggers physical morbidity and paralyzes the individual’s social functioning [31,32].”
Zhao, K., Zheng, D., Li, Y., Sun, L., Guo, G., Li, L., Guo, X., & Wang, D. (2026) · Asian Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/j.anr.2026.05.002
Healing journeys: the psychological benefits of wellness tourism for cancer survivors
Tang, L., Feng, Z., Yang, Y., Xu, H., & Sun, W. (2026) · Psycho-Oncologie · doi:10.18282/po5613
Ikhwan, A. M., Hassan, S. A., & Yusop, Y. M. (2025) · Pertanika Journal of Counsellor Educator and Counselling Psychology · doi:10.47836/pjocecp.1.1.06
Psychosocial Issues in Cancer Care
Sarıbudak, T. P., & Üzar‐Özçetin, Y. S. (2026) · Seminars in Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.soncn.2026.152298
- Authors
- Mirhosseini, S., Imani Parsa, F., Moghadam-Roshtkhar, H., Basirinezhad, M. H., Ameri, M., & Ebrahimi, H.
- Affiliations
- Shahroud University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Ebrahimi, Hossein
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2025-02-27
- Volume
- 16
- Pages
- 1430371-1430371
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11903719
- OpenAlex
- W4408004605
- Semantic Scholar
- 6596a984151a55eaf0e5670aaa0c21a25999e490
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7
- FWCI
- 14.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
- Keywords
- psychoeducation, family caregivers, cancer patients, caregiver burden, quality of life, online group intervention, chemotherapy, caregiver support, stress management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-14.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-14.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review