The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional dyspepsia: the economic impact to patients
Abstract
Summary: Background: Although highly prevalent, little is known about the economic impact of functional dyspepsia (FD). Aims: To quantify FD patients' health care utilisation patterns and to estimate direct and indirect costs of FD to patients. Methods: ICD‐9 codes identified adult patients with dyspepsia. A validated questionnaire was mailed to patients who met Rome III criteria for FD. Results: Three hundred and fifty‐five patients met all inclusion criteria. The response rate was 63%. The respondents' mean age was 50 (14) years; 75% were women; 52% of respondents rated their FD as moderate. Patients reported 3 visits (mean) to their PCP over 12 months; 75% reported having blood work, 92% an EGD, 59% an ultrasound and 40% a CT scan. The direct cost of testing using Medicare reimbursement rates per patient was $582. To treat FD symptoms, 89% tried dietary changes, 89% over‐the‐counter medications, 87% prescription medications and 25% alternative therapies. Mean patient expenditure over the last year was $246 for OTC medications (range $0–12,000), $290 for co‐payments (range $0–9,000) and $110 for alternative treatments (range $0–3,741). Total mean direct cost yearly to patients was $699. In the 7 days prior to completing the questionnaire, respondents reported a mean of 1.4 h absence from work. Extrapolating the results to the US population, we conservatively calculate the costs of FD were $18.4 billion in 2009. Conclusions: Functional dyspepsia patients incur significant direct and indirect costs and work productivity is impaired by dyspeptic symptoms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reilly, M. C., Bracco, A., Ricci, J. ‐., Santoro, J., & Stevens, T. (2004) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02091.x · Cited by 196
Cited by
Functional gastrointestinal disorders: advances in understanding and management
Black, C. J., Drossman, D. A., Talley, N. J., Ruddy, J., & Ford, A. C. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32115-2 · Cited by 605
Self-citationProton pump inhibitors for functional dyspepsia
Pinto-Sanchez, M. I., Yuan, Y., Hassan, A., Bercik, P., & Moayyedi, P. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011194.pub3 · Cited by 195
Schnabel, L., Buscail, C., Sabate, J.-M., Bouchoucha, M., Kesse-Guyot, E., Allès, B., Touvier, M., Monteiro, C. A., Hercberg, S., Benamouzig, R., et al. (2018) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/s41395-018-0137-1 · Cited by 173
Carbone, F., Goelen, N., Fikree, A., Aziz, Q., & Tack, J. (2021) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/nmo.14086 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Lacy, B. E., Weiser, K. T., Kennedy, A. T., Crowell, M. D., & Talley, N. J.
- Venue
- Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-06-03
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 170-177
- ISSN
- 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2036
- OpenAlex
- W1971286694
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional dyspepsia: the economic impact to patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/apt.12355
- The paper
- Lacy, B. E., Weiser, K. T., Kennedy, A. T., Crowell, M. D., & Talley, N. J. (2013). Functional dyspepsia: the economic impact to patients. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.12355
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.