Cited by 5Gastrointestinal motility and disordersGastroesophageal reflux and treatmentsConnective tissue disorders research

Impact of joint hypermobility syndrome on gastric accommodation and nutrient tolerance in functional dyspepsia

Carbone, Florencia, Goelen, Nick, Fikree, Asma, Aziz, Qasim, Tack, Jan·2021·Neurogastroenterology & Motility

Abstract

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is defined as the presence of gastroduodenal symptoms in the absence of organic disease that is likely to explain the symptoms. Joint hypermobility (JH) refers to the increased passive or active movement of a joint beyond its normal range and is characteristically present in patients with joint hypermobility syndrome (JHS), which is a hypermobile subtype of Ehlers‐Danlos syndrome (EDS). Recent reports have highlighted the co‐existence of FD with Ehlers‐Danlos syndrome. Our aim was to study the prevalence of JHS in FD compared with healthy subjects and to study the impact of co‐existing JHS on gastric motility, nutrient tolerance, and dyspeptic symptoms in FD. Methods: FD patients filled out a dyspepsia symptom severity score. Intragastric pressure (IGP) was measured with high‐resolution manometry (HRM) during the intragastric infusion of nutrition drink (ND, 1.5 Kcal/ml, 60 ml/min) until maximal satiation in healthy subjects and FD. We compared IGP profiles and nutrient tolerance in HS and FD with or without JHS. Results: JHS was present in 54% of FD patients (n = 39, 41.2 ± 2.2 years old) and 7% of healthy subjects (n = 15, 27.3 ± 2.3 years old). IGP drop and nutrient tolerance were lower in non‐JHS‐FD compared with JHS‐FD and HS (AUC JHS‐FD: −17.9 ± 2.5 vs. non‐JHS‐FD: −13.0 ± 3.3 mmHg min,p = 0.2, HS:‐19.6 ± 2.9 mmHg min; ND tolerance non‐JHS‐FD: 671.0 ± 96.0 vs. JHS‐FD: 842.7 ± 105.7 Kcal,p = 0.25, HS: 980.0 ± 108.1 Kcal). Conclusion: JHS often co‐exists with FD. Non‐JHS‐FD was characterized by decreased accommodation and lower nutrient tolerance characterized compared with JHS‐FD. Clinicaltrials.gov, reference number NCT04279990.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nmo.14086

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carbone, F., Goelen, N., Fikree, A., Aziz, Q., & Tack, J.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Tack, Jan
Venue
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-02-02
Volume
33
Issue
7
Pages
e14086-e14086
ISSN
  • 1350-1925 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2982
OpenAlex
W3128039875
Cited by
5
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurogastroenterology & Motility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
Keywords
joint hypermobility syndrome, functional dyspepsia, gastric accommodation, nutrient tolerance, intragastric pressure, gastric motility, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, high-resolution manometry
MeSH terms
Adult, Dyspepsia, Female, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Gastrointestinal Motility, Humans, Joint Instability, Male, Syndrome, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review