Cited by 42Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentLiver Disease and TransplantationLiver Diseases and Immunity

Long-term prognostic value of the FibroTest in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, compared to chronic hepatitis C, B, and alcoholic liver disease

Open access
Munteanu, Mona, Pais, Raluca, Peta, Valentina, Deckmyn, Olivier, Moussalli, Joseph, Ngo, Yen, Rudler, Marika, Lebray, Pascal +10 more·2018·Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the FibroTest has been validated as a biomarker to determine the stage of fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) with results similar to those in chronic hepatitis C (CHC), B (CHB), and alcoholic liver disease (ALD), it has not yet been confirmed for the prediction of liver-related death. AIM: To validate the 10-year prognostic value of FibroTest in NAFLD for the prediction of liver-related death. METHOD: Patients in the prospective FibroFrance cohort who underwent a FibroTest between 1997 and 2012 were pre-included. Mortality status was obtained from physicians, hospitals or the national register. Survival analyses were based on univariate (Kaplan-Meier, log rank, AUROC) and multivariate Cox risk ratio taking into account age, sex and response to anti-viral treatment as covariates. The comparator was the performance of the FibroTest in CHC, the most validated population. RESULTS: 7082 patients were included; 1079, 3449, 2051, and 503 with NAFLD, CHC, CHB, and ALD, respectively. Median (range) follow-up was 6.0 years (0.1-19.3). Ten year survival (95% CI) without liver-related death in patients with NAFLD was 0.956 (0.940-0.971; 38 events) and 0.832 (0.818-0.847; 226 events; P = 0.004) in CHC. The prognostic value (AUROC / Cox risk ratio) of FibroTest in patients with NAFLD was 0.941 (0.905-0.978)/1638 (342-7839) and even higher than in patients with CHC 0.875 (0.849-0.901; P = 0.01)/2657 (993-6586). CONCLUSIONS: The FibroTest has a high prognostic value in NAFLD for the prediction of liver-related death. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01927133).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/apt.14990

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several observational studies showed that LSM had good accuracy for liver-related events, liver-related and overall mortality.

    “Several observational studies showed that LSM had good accuracy for liver-related events, liver-related and overall mortality. 178,183,184”

    From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [183]

    The Results (FibroTest prognostic performance; page not provided) report good accuracy for transient elastography, a liver stiffness measurement method, in predicting liver-related deaths in a NAFLD subgroup (AUROC 0.923). The paper does not establish its accuracy for other liver-related events or overall mortality; its main prognostic analyses concern FibroTest. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Munteanu, M., Pais, R., Peta, V., Deckmyn, O., Moussalli, J., Ngo, Y., Rudler, M., Lebray, P., Charlotte, F., Thibault, V., Lucidarme, O., Ngo, A., Imbert‐Bismut, F., Housset, C., Thabut, D., Ratziu, V., Poynard, T., & the FibroFrance Group
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • BioPredictive Paris France
  • Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
  • Hepatology Department Assistance Publique‐Hôpitaux de Paris Pitié‐Salpêtrière Hospital Paris France
Corresponding author
Poynard, Thierry
Venue
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-10-17
Volume
48
Issue
10
Pages
1117-1127
ISSN
  • 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2036
OpenAlex
W2897602569
Cited by
42
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
Keywords
FibroTest, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, liver-related mortality, prognostic factors, liver fibrosis, chronic hepatitis C, chronic hepatitis B, alcoholic liver disease, survival analysis, liver disease staging, liver cirrhosis, liver cancer, liver failure
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, France, Humans, Liver Diseases, Alcoholic, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Biomarkers, Survival Analysis, Hepatitis B, Chronic, Hepatitis C, Chronic, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review