The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Doing fieldwork the Chinese way: a returning researcher's insider/outsider status in her home town
Abstract
Insider/outsider status has been recognised in geographical literature as an important aspect of positionality on which researchers should reflect critically. Based on my fieldwork experience in Dali, southwest China, this paper articulates an account of the co‐existence of ‘insiderness’ and ‘outsiderness’ during the research process in a way that adds nuance to scholarly challenges to conceptions of insider/outsider status as an oppositional binary. I touch on several dilemmas that arose over the course of my fieldwork in my home town, such as working with local research assistants, ‘encountering’ a Western supervisor in the field and interviewing local people. I argue that interacting in the field with people from different ethnic, professional or socioeconomic characteristics dynamises a researcher's insider/outsider position, bringing his or her in‐between position to the fore. In this paper, I highlight the tensions and negotiations arising from my experience of in‐betweenness in Dali. I also point out several particularities of doing fieldwork in China by referring to Chinese ways of thinking and communication, and analyse how insiderness complicates the research process with particular regard to China. Finally, I conclude that working in the field is not only a process of data collection, but also a process of learning ‘who I am’.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Social attributes of class, gender, sexuality, race, caste, etc. are commonly cited elements that 'mark a researcher's relational position in society' (Zhao, 2017, p. 185).”
From Power, positionality and practitioner research: Schoolteachers' experiences of professional doctorates in education (2023) · cites this paper as Zhao, 2017
Citations
Cites
Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics
Rose, G. (1997) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1191/030913297673302122 · Cited by 2,390
Ho, D. Y.-F. (1976) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226145 · Cited by 1,168
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- 10.1080/14631360701595007 · DOI
- 10.1177/1468794112468474 · DOI
- Botterill K, 2015, ‘We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are’: questioning the ‘outsider’ in Polish migration research, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 16
- 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2006.tb00389.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0129-7619.2004.00172.x · DOI
- 10.1080/0966369X.2011.649348 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8373.2010.01420.x · DOI
- 10.1080/0966369X.2014.939157 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-9493.00153 · DOI
- 10.1080/10941665.2011.613207 · DOI
- Dowling R, 2005, Qualitative research methods in human geography, 19
- 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00080.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00506.x · DOI
- Fonow M M, 1991, Beyond methodology: feminist scholarship as lived research, 10.2979/1211.0 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0147-1767(98)00003-0 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-0459.2006.00221.x · DOI
- 10.1111/gec3.12219 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00645319 · DOI
- 10.4135/9781412985505 · DOI
- Ite U, 1997, Postgraduate fieldwork in developing areas: a rough guide, 75
- 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00067.x · DOI
- 10.1080/0966369X.2014.958063 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/08873631.2014.906852 · DOI
- Lee‐Wong S M, 2000, Politeness and face in Chinese culture
- 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00843.x · DOI
- 10.1080/03098269708725444 · DOI
- 10.1080/02601370120490 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1466138114533466 · DOI
- Mohammed R, 2001, Qualitative methods for geographers: issues and debates, 101
- 10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00025-1 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00054.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/0004918042000249476 · DOI
- 10.1111/sjtg.12005_6 · DOI
- 10.1080/01419870701491952 · DOI
- 10.1080/07908310608668758 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2001.tb00457.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8373.2010.01425.x · DOI
- 10.1111/area.12017 · DOI
- 10.17730/humo.49.1.h1m8642ln1843n45 · DOI
- Yang K, 1957, The origin and formation of Bai in Yunnan
- Zheng H, 2011, A pragmatic analysis of interruptions in speech act, Journal of Hunan First Normal University, 11, 123
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Czerniawski, G. (2023) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.3902 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, Y.
- Affiliations
- McGill University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Zhao, Yawei
- ORCID
- Zhao, Yawei
- Venue
- Area
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-03-21
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 185-191
- ISSN
- 0004-0894 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-4762
- OpenAlex
- W2598572924
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 12.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Area (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Historical Geography and Geographical Thought
- Keywords
- insider and outsider, researcher positionality, in-betweenness, Dali, reflexivity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review