The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Not‐So‐Common‐Wealth of Australia: Evidence for a Cross‐Cultural Desire for a More Equal Distribution of Wealth
Abstract
Recent evidence suggests that Americans underestimate wealth inequality in the United States and favor a more equal wealth distribution (Norton & Ariely, ). Does this pattern reflect ideological dynamics unique to the United States, or is the phenomenon evident in other developed economies—such as Australia? We assessed Australians’ perceived and ideal wealth distributions and compared them to the actual wealth distribution. Although the United States and Australia differ in the degree of actual wealth inequality and in cultural narratives around economic mobility, the Australian data closely replicated the United States findings. Misperceptions of wealth inequality as well as preferences for more equal distributions may be common across developed economies. In addition, beliefs about wealth distribution only weakly predicted support for raising the minimum wage, suggesting that attitudes toward inequality may not translate into preferences for redistributive policies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similar results for Australian respondents were reported by Norton, Neal, Govan, Ariely, and Holland (2014).”
From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Norton, Neal, Govan, Ariely, and Holland (2014)
Citations
Cites
Building a Better America—One Wealth Quintile at a Time
Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610393524 · Cited by 1,119
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- 10.1017/S1537592705050036 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0956797612450035 · DOI
- Kumhof M. &Ranciere R.(2010).Inequality leverage and crises. IMF Working Paper 10/268. · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02124.x · DOI
- 10.1177/1745691611406922 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01810.x · DOI
- OECD. (2011).Divided We Stand: Why Inequality Keeps Rising OECD Publishing. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264119536‐en · DOI
- 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.072066 · DOI
- 10.4159/9780674042605 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0956797611434540 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0007123400004506 · DOI
- Wilkinson R. G., 2009, The spirit level: Why greater equality makes societies stronger
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour
Manstead, A. S. R. (2018) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12251 · Cited by 831
Metadata
- Authors
- Norton, M. I., Neal, D. T., Govan, C. L., Ariely, D., & Holland, E.
- Affiliations
- Harvard Business School
- Empirica Research
- Empirica Research and The University of Melbourne
- Duke University
- The University of Melbourne
- Venue
- Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-04-17
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 339-351
- ISSN
- 1529-7489
- 1530-2415
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review