The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review of deprescribing processes and development of an evidence‐based, patient‐centred deprescribing process
Open accessAbstract
Inappropriate use of medication is widespread, especially in older people, and is associated with risks, including adverse drug reactions, hospitalization and increased mortality. Optimization of appropriate medication use to minimize these harms is an ongoing challenge in healthcare. The term ‘deprescribing’ has been used to describe the complex process that is required for safe and effective cessation of medication. Patients play an important role in their own health and, while they may complain about the number of medications they have to take, they may also be reluctant to cease a medication when given the opportunity to do so. A review of previously proposed deprescribing processes and relevant literature was used to develop the patient‐centred deprescribing process, which is a five‐step cycle that encompasses gaining a comprehensive medication history, identifying potentially inappropriate medications, determining whether the potentially inappropriate medication can be ceased, planning the withdrawal regimen (e.g. tapering where necessary) and provision of monitoring, support and documentation. This is the first deprescribing process developed using knowledge of the patients' views of medication cessation; it focuses on engaging patients throughout the process, with the aim of improving long‐term health outcomes. Despite a comprehensive review of the literature, there is still a lack in the evidence base on which to conduct deprescribing. The next step in broadening the evidence to support deprescribing will be to test the developed process to determine feasibility in the clinical setting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care
Grol, R., & Grimshaw, J. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14546-1 · Cited by 4,531
Shared decision making — The pinnacle of patient-centered care
Barry, M. J., & Edgman-Levitan, S. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp1109283 · Cited by 3,433
Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature
Mead, N., & Bower, P. (2000) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00098-8 · Cited by 2,976
Emergency Hospitalizations for Adverse Drug Events in Older Americans
Budnitz, D. S., Lovegrove, M. C., Shehab, N., & Richards, C. L. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa1103053 · Cited by 1,820
Preventing Falls in Elderly Persons
Tinetti, M. E. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcp020719 · Cited by 1,660
Stewart, M. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7284.444 · Cited by 1,111
Not all patients want to participate in decision making: A national study of public preferences
Levinson, W., Kao, A., Kuby, A., & Thisted, R. A. (2005) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.04101.x · Cited by 1,103
Appropriate prescribing in elderly people: how well can it be measured and optimised?
Spinewine, A., Schmader, K. E., Barber, N., Hughes, C., Lapane, K. L., Swine, C., & Hanlon, J. T. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61091-5 · Cited by 1,090
Van Spall, H. G. C., Toren, A., Kiss, A., & Fowler, R. A. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.297.11.1233 · Cited by 1,055
Kitson, A., Marshall, A., Bassett, K., & Zeitz, K. (2013) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06064.x · Cited by 924
Cited by
Reeve, E., Gnjidic, D., Long, J., & Hilmer, S. (2015) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bcp.12732 · Cited by 855
Self-citationReeve, E., Thompson, W., & Farrell, B. (2017) · European Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2016.12.021 · Cited by 331
Self-citationDeprescribing for Community-Dwelling Older Adults: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Bloomfield, H. E., Greer, N., Linsky, A. M., Bolduc, J., Naidl, T., Vardeny, O., MacDonald, R., McKenzie, L., & Wilt, T. J. (2020) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-020-06089-2 · Cited by 240
Deprescribing benzodiazepines and Z-drugs in community-dwelling adults: a scoping review
Pollmann, A. S., Murphy, A. L., Bergman, J. C., & Gardner, D. M. (2015) · BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1186/s40360-015-0019-8 · Cited by 114
Scott, I. A., Pillans, P. I., Barras, M., & Morris, C. (2018) · Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety · doi:10.1177/2042098618784809 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Reeve, E., Shakib, S., Hendrix, I., Roberts, M. S., & Wiese, M. D.
- Venue
- British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-09-19
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 738-747
- ISSN
- 0306-5251 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2125
- OpenAlex
- W1920692730
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 82
- FWCI
- 9.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of deprescribing processes and development of an evidence‐based, patient‐centred deprescribing process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/bcp.12386
- The paper
- Reeve, E., Shakib, S., Hendrix, I., Roberts, M. S., & Wiese, M. D. (2014). Review of deprescribing processes and development of an evidence‐based, patient‐centred deprescribing process. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.12386
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.