Cited by 114Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesElectronic Health Records SystemsMedical Coding and Health Information

Using EMR-enabled computerized decision support systems to reduce prescribing of potentially inappropriate medications: a narrative review

Open access
Scott, Ian A., Pillans, Peter I., Barras, Michael, Morris, Christopher·2018·Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety

Abstract

Prescribing of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) that pose more risk than benefit in older patients is a common occurrence across all healthcare settings. Reducing such prescribing has been challenging despite multiple interventions, including educational campaigns, audits and feedback, geriatrician assessment and formulary restrictions. With the increasing uptake of electronic medical records (EMRs) across hospitals, clinics and residential aged care facilities (RACFs), integrated with computerized physician order entry (CPOE) and e-prescribing, opportunities exist for incorporating clinical decision support systems (CDSS) into EMR at the point of care. This narrative review assessed the process and outcomes of using EMR-enabled CDSS to reduce the prescribing of PIMs. We searched PubMed for relevant articles published up to January 2018 and focused on those that described EMR-enabled CDSS that assisted prescribers to make changes at the time of ordering PIMs in adults. Computerized systems offering only medication reconciliation, dose checks, monitoring for medication errors, or basic formulary information were not included. In addition to outcome measures of medication-related processes and adverse drug events, qualitative data relating to factors that influence effectiveness of EMR-enabled CDSS were also gathered from selected studies. We analysed 20 studies comprising 10 randomized trials and 10 observational studies performed in hospitals ( n = 8), ambulatory care clinics ( n = 9) and RACFs ( n = 3). Studies varied in patient populations (although most involved older patients), type of CDSS, method of linkage with EMR, study designs and outcome measures. However, assuming little publication bias, the totality of evidence favoured EMR-enabled CDSS as being effective in reducing the prescribing of PIMs in hospitals, although results were more mixed for ambulatory care settings and RACFs. While absolute effects in most positive studies were modest, they suggest EMR-enabled CDSS are feasible and acceptable to clinicians, and if certain design features are adhered to, there is potential for even greater impact.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2042098618784809

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Attempts to digitize deprescribing criteria into electronic clinical decision support have raised difficulties, typically requiring a labor-intensive coding process and unstructured information such as free text from patient records to contextualize certain criteria.

    “Attempts to digitize these criteria into electronic clinical decision support (CDS) have raised difficulties, typically requiring a labor-intensive coding process and unstructured information such as free text from patient records to contextualize certain criteria [11,12].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scott, I. A., Pillans, P. I., Barras, M., & Morris, C.
Affiliations
  • Princess Alexandra Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Queensland Health (AU)
Corresponding author
Scott, Ian A.
Venue
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety
Published
2018-07-12
Volume
9
Issue
9
Pages
559-573
ISSN
  • 2042-0986 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-0994
OpenAlex
W2874356702
Cited by
114
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
potentially inappropriate medications, computerized decision support systems, electronic health records, drug prescribing, older adults, electronic prescribing, computerized physician order entry, drug safety, adverse drug reactions, residential aged care facilities, outpatient care, hospital prescribing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review