The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Psycho‐Education Intervention by Midwives in Reducing Childbirth Fear in Pregnant Women
Open accessAbstract
Background: Childbirth fear is associated with increased obstetric interventions and poor emotional and psychological health for women. The purpose of this study is to test an antenatal psycho‐education intervention by midwives in reducing women's childbirth fear. Methods: Women ( n = 1,410) attending three hospitals in South East Queensland, Australia, were recruited into the BELIEF trial. Participants reporting high fear were randomly allocated to intervention ( n = 170) or control ( n = 169) groups. All women received a decision‐aid booklet on childbirth choices. The telephone counseling intervention was offered at 24 and 34 weeks of pregnancy. The control group received usual care offered by public maternity services. Primary outcome was reduction in childbirth fear ( WDEQ ‐A) from second trimester to 36 weeks’ gestation. Secondary outcomes were improved childbirth self‐efficacy, and reduced decisional conflict and depressive symptoms. Demographic, obstetric & psychometric measures were administered at recruitment, and 36 weeks of pregnancy. Results: There were significant differences between groups on postintervention scores for fear of birth ( p < 0.001) and childbirth self‐efficacy ( p = 0.002). Decisional conflict and depressive symptoms reduced but were not significant. Conclusion: Psycho‐education by trained midwives was effective in reducing high childbirth fear levels and increasing childbirth confidence in pregnant women. Improving antenatal emotional well‐being may have wider positive social and maternity care implications for optimal childbirth experiences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“After adjustment for the preintervention levels of FOB, the reduction in FOB was slightly higher for women in the intervention group.”
From Comparing internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy with standard care for women with fear of birth: Randomized controlled trial (2018) · cites this paper as [27]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“An Australian trial compared midwife telephone counseling on two occasions to standard antenatal care, showing reduced levels of FOB at postintervention (gestational week 36) in both groups [27].”
From Comparing internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy with standard care for women with fear of birth: Randomized controlled trial (2018) · cites this paper as [27]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Similar decreases in FOB over time have been shown before, both among women with mixed levels of fear in early pregnancy [11] and among women receiving support for FOB [27].”
From Comparing internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy with standard care for women with fear of birth: Randomized controlled trial (2018) · cites this paper as [27]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Psychoeducation is a nonclinical intervention associated with less FOC, 25”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Detection of Postnatal Depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
Cox, J. L., Holden, J. M., & Sagovsky, R. (1987) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.150.6.782 · Cited by 14,183
Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health Status
Kazis, L. E., Anderson, J. J., & Meenan, R. F. (1989) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198903001-00015 · Cited by 2,401
Screening for depression during pregnancy with the edinburgh depression scale (EDDS)
Murray, D., & Cox, J. L. (1990) · Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology · doi:10.1080/02646839008403615 · Cited by 973
Psychometric aspects of the W-DEQ; a new questionnaire for the measurement of fear of childbirth.
Wijma, K., Wijma, B., & Zar, M. (1998) · Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.3109/01674829809048501 · Cited by 811
Biostatistics: The Bare Essentials
Kendrach, M. G. (1997) · American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy · doi:10.1093/ajhp/54.2.223 · Cited by 476
Fear of childbirth: a neglected dilemma
Saisto, T., & Halmesmäki, E. (2003) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00114.x · Cited by 461
Waldenström, U., Hildingsson, I., & Ryding, E. (2006) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00950.x · Cited by 415
Self-citationFear of childbirth and duration of labour: a study of 2206 women with intended vaginal delivery
Adams, S., Eberhard‐Gran, M., & Eskild, A. (2012) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03433.x · Cited by 378
Nieminen, K., Stephansson, O., & Ryding, E. L. (2009) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1080/00016340902998436 · Cited by 373
Self-citationFear of childbirth according to parity, gestational age, and obstetric history
Rouhe, H., Salmela‐Aro, K., Halmesmäki, E., & Saisto, T. (2008) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02002.x · Cited by 363
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 10.1111/j1471‐0528201203433x · DOI
- Cohen J, 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–228 of 228
Santiago, L. D., Janzen, D. C., da Silva, E. F., Barreto, L. V., & Silva, L. C. P. (2023) · Enfermagem Brasil · doi:10.33233/eb.v22i5.5264
Çetin, S. A., & Çiçek, Ö. (2023) · Modern Care Journal · doi:10.5812/mcj-137222
Avcı, F. (2024) · International Target Medicine Journal · doi:10.29228/targetmedj.71519
Ayuanda, L. N., Kusuma, N. I., Izzah, N., & Chabibah, N. (2024) · Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in social science, education and humanities research · doi:10.2991/978-2-38476-273-6_123
Khademi, S., Movahedi, S., Khosravi, A., & Ebrahimi, E. (2024) · Nursing and Midwifery Journal · doi:10.61186/unmf.22.4.300
Doğum Korkusunu Azalt, Anne- Bebek Bağlanmasını Arttır Haptonomi Uygulaması: Geleneksel Derleme
Küçükkaya, B., & Işık, H. K. (2024) · Sağlık Profesyonelleri Araştırma Dergisi · doi:10.57224/jhpr.1451227
Tokophobie und Selbstwirksamkeit – welchen Einfluss hat die Geburtsvorbereitung durch Hebammen?
Döring, E. (2025) · Hebamme · doi:10.1055/a-2512-6926
Sandström, L., Kaunonen, M., Huhtala, H., & Aho, A. L. (2025) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.17073
Drawing and Midwife-led Counseling for Reducing Fear of Childbirth and Distress in Late Pregnancy
Govahi, M., Behmanesh, F., Bakhtiari, A., Kheirkhah, F., & Chehrazi, M. (2025) · Current Women s Health Reviews · doi:10.2174/0115734048370094250630063133
Non-pharmacological interventions for reducing fear of childbirth
Gültepe, R. (2025) · Scripta Medica · doi:10.5937/scriptamed56-61399
Sayar, S. E., & Apay, S. E. (2025) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-025-08479-y
Mousavi, S. R., Amiri‐Farahani, L., Hasanpoor‐Azghady, S. B., & Saravi, S. O. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.16943526
Zahroh, R. I., Sutcliffe, K., Kneale, D., Corona, M. V., Betrán, A. P., Opiyo, N., Homer, C., & Bohren, M. A. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26619289
Zahroh, R. I., Sutcliffe, K., Kneale, D., Corona, M. V., Betrán, A. P., Opiyo, N., Homer, C., & Bohren, M. A. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26619292
Mousavi, S. R., Amiri‐Farahani, L., Hasanpoor‐Azghady, S. B., & Saravi, S. O. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.16943529
Zahroh, R. I., Sutcliffe, K., Kneale, D., Corona, M. V., Betrán, A. P., Opiyo, N., Homer, C., & Bohren, M. A. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26619283
Alizadeh-Dibazari, Z., Abdolalipour, S., & Mirghafourvand, M. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26606878
Zahroh, R. I., Sutcliffe, K., Kneale, D., Corona, M. V., Betrán, A. P., Opiyo, N., Homer, C., & Bohren, M. A. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26619286
Beirami, A., & Rahemi, Z. (2024) · Journal of Research Development in Nursing and Midwifery · doi:10.61882/jgbfnm.21.4.41
Alizadeh-Dibazari, Z., Abbasalizadeh, F., Mohammad‐Alizadeh‐Charandabi, S., & Mirghafourvand, M. (2026) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112218
Topçu, T. Y., & Aktaş, S. (2026) · Health Education Research · doi:10.1093/her/cyag007
Rauh, K. (2026) · Zeitschrift für Hebammenwissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s44476-026-00035-7
EXPLORATION OF THE CONCEPT ‘MIDWIFERY INTERVENTION’: a concept analysis
Nieuwenhuijze, M. J., & Gottfreðsdóttir, H. (2026) · European Journal of Midwifery · doi:10.18332/ejm/216185
MacMillan, K. K., Greenhalgh, C. F., Cleary, D. B., Cahill, J., Dedman, K., Weir, C., Bright, C., White, S. W., Bradfield, Z., & Watson, S. (2026) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-026-09425-2
Zhang, Z., Liu, S., Yuan, Y., He, L., Zhao, L., & Ning, W. (2026) · Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · doi:10.1111/jog.70431
Ebelik Öğrencilerinde Gebelik Öncesi Doğum Korkusu
Özlem, A. R. I., ÖZER, B. U., & Şahin, E. N. (2026) · Artuklu Health · doi:10.58252/artukluhealth.1903216
Turan, A., Kara, H., & Gürler, B. (2026) · Online Türk Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.26453/otjhs.1927762
Metadata
- Authors
- Toohill, J., Fenwick, J., Gamble, J., Creedy, D. K., Buist, A., Turkstra, E., & Ryding, E.
- Affiliations
- Griffith University (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Toohill, Jocelyn
- Venue
- Birth
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-10-09
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 384-394
- ISSN
- 0730-7659 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-536X
- PMC
- PMC4257571
- OpenAlex
- W1978374197
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 13.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Birth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1025099)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Keywords
- fear of childbirth, psychoeducation, midwives, antenatal interventions, childbirth self-efficacy, decisional conflict, depressive symptoms, telephone counseling, obstetric surgery
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Counseling, Decision Support Techniques, Depression, Fear, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Midwifery, Pregnancy, Treatment Outcome, Self Efficacy, Parturition, Young Adult, Prenatal Education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review